Micah Mileto

Where is the late John Hunt's essay on the Burros fragment now?

I think the defect in the photos I posted is different from the holes in the color footage. Those are shown here: https://imgur.com/a/L7qMXxr But those holes are also noticeably next to several nails/screws in the wall.

Where can I find discussion of that specific tiny hole in the book? I have the digital version.

https://content.invisioncic.com/r16296/monthly_2016_12/Photo_rfk_BulletHoles.jpg.41bc36ce0238c10b567ae7c0421f3b7b.jpg https://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/images/1/15/Photo_rfk_grex37_0466.jpg Is this supposed to be a bullet hole or is that a nail?

Moldea is also the guy who claimed the D.C. Madam was suicidal, while she had previously joked on the Alex Jones show about how not-suicidal she was.

Could you fire an empty .22 shell casing with the powder still in it? Like, if you just removed the slug and fired the empty casing with the solidified powder charge? If so, would that create a flame out of the barrel? https://i.imgur.com/4cqMxTT.png

This guy says Nagell shot in the direction of the Teller and RAN from the Police before giving up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgJ3G96aH7U Sure glad I listened to this before wasting time on Nagell. Unless anyone can refute the points raised?

Is there any reason why the chest tube incisions at Parkland were deep but shallow at Bethesda?

http://rfktapes.com/bonus-follow-the-lies/ http://rfktapes.com/bonus-ep-4-transcript/ BILL: The standard argument against Cesar being the guy who shot Kennedy was that Cesar was supposedly carrying a .38 caliber pistol, while the bullets in Kennedy’s back were from a .22. But Cesar did own a .22. And although he was interviewed the night of the murder, there is no record of anyone inspecting his gun to see what caliber it was, or if it had been fired. But maybe someone did. DANIEL JENSEN: And the next night at roll call, now remember this is just a bunch of cops sitting around talking, that’s when the discussion came up of the second gun. BILL: In Zac’s interview with officer Daniel Jensen, Jensen said that he heard other cops talking about extra bullets and about a security guard who had carried a .22. JENSEN: I don’t remember exactly they found one or two many bullet holes. The guy had a .22, it was a 7 shot or a 9 shot, but there were too many bullet holes. ZAC: Sirhan’s gun held 8 shots. JENSEN: So that means if he had 8, they found 10 the way I recall. There were two, too many bullet holes. But remember, I’m hearing all this stuff, locker room talk, and one of the officers was saying that the security guard had a .22 which is an unusual gun to carry and the cops started speculating. You know what, I bet he capped off some rounds. BILL: This is an extraordinary conversation. Of course, it’s not proof of anything, it’s just, as Jensen says, “locker room talk.” But if this is true, it greatly strengthens the case against Cesar. And if Cesar did it, I can’t tell you why he sounds innocent. Some people are just wired that way. Or maybe someone messed with his mind. The evidence of a second gun is not limited to extra bullets in the door frames, or the suspicions around Gene Cesar. There are wounds in Robert Kennedy that are seriously inconsistent with his position relative to Sirhan. According to the autopsy, the four bullets that struck Kennedy were all fired an inch or two away. Three of them were fired at a steep upward angle. Most reliable witnesses put Sirhan’s gun in front of Kennedy and a foot and a half to three feet away when the shooting started. It is possible that Kennedy turned at the last moment, and it is possible that Sirhan lunged, closing the distance to create a contact shot. But given the existing evidence, I believe it’s near impossible for Sirhan to get four shots into Kennedy’s back at contact range and at a steep upward angle. Maitre d’ Karl Uecker has said repeatedly that he grabbed Sirhan’s wrist after the first two shots, then wrestled him down to the steam table, where Sirhan began to fire again. Nine other witnesses said they pretty much heard the same thing: two shots, a pause, and then a volley of shots. If all that’s true, where in that sequence can Sirhan fire four shots into the back of Kennedy at a steep upward angle? This one goes right by the police, so I want to credit Dan Moldea for recognizing this problem and trying to deal with it. I just don’t agree with how he solves it.

Heavy.com suggests that he is/was still living in California.

Ever see the end of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence? It's basically the inspiration for the RFK Assassination.

tangential wound from behind?

Startpage the search engine is also an allegedly more objective version of Google. It's owned by Google, but the search results (again, allegedly) aren't tailored to data gathered on you.

DuckDuckGo only and even then be suspicious. Asking Google something is like asking Agent Smith something. Even Bing is better. You actually have to know what you're looking for to find the video of Jack Ruby confessing to a conspiracy after shooting Oswald. Search "JFK Assassination conspiracy" on Youtube and the most conspiratorial thing you'll find is the New York Times Umbrella Man video. We NEED a free-speech based social media network with no algorithms besides what's most popular.

I'm wondering if the original plan was to frame it as 8 shots, but the shooters panicked when they saw Sirhan's hand be subdued.

From [Francis X. O'Neill's 4/6/2005 interview by Brian R. Hollstein from *The Society of Former Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation* (SFSAFBI)] http://www.nleomf.org/assets/pdfs/nlem/oral-histories/FBI_O-Neill_interview.pdf F: [...] We just flipped him over. Jim Sibert said, “What is that right there?” In the upper right hand back, there was a hole and the doctor said, “Oh, my God, that’s a bullet hole.” So I am closer to him, to the body, than I am to you now. The doctors took their surgical probes. First of all, they tried to insert a finger in the hole, then they took the surgical probe and they probed with their fingers in the back. What happened? How come no point of exit? We hadn’t got up to the head yet, but there was still quite a big hole there. So Jim left then. One of us decided that Jim would be the one to call the Bureau and he called the Bureau, the laboratory, and he said, “Look, we are here, we have a body and a bullet hole, but there’s no bullet. Could it be an ice bullet like Dick Tracy? The Bureau said they just found a bullet on a stretcher in Dallas and it was a silver, pristine type bullet. So we came back and told that to the doctors and the doctor said, “Ah, that explains it. The bullet that was shot through the upper back here worked its way through external cardiac massage.” They knew they did that down in Dallas most probably. Rather than saying “most probably,” and there is no question in our minds that that particular bullet was in the back, fell out and landed on the stretcher.

Can't see a second shooter if you're getting shot, maybe?

The film does shoe the limo slowing to practically a stop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sqk3sdfXFkc

John Hunt died?!

Were there any films taken of RFK's head that could show the "two bullet tracks"? Wouldn't there be X-rays and photographs of the sectioned brain?

Okay, well wouldn't he be a useful witness to show all the people who can't grasp your higher physics?

From the NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations: A) Terrorism. The targets set by terrorists may appear to be at random; however, target locations are generally selected with some degree of political or economic significance. Political targets generally include government offices, newspapers, universities, political party headquarters, and military or law enforcement installations. Political terrorists may also target diverse properties such as animal research facilities or abortion clinics. Economic targets may include business offices, distribution facilities of utility providers (e.g., atomic generation plants), banks, or companies thought to have an adverse impact on the environment. Fires or explosions become a means of creating confusion, fear, or anarchy. The terrorist may include fire as but one of a variety of weapons, along with explosives, used in furthering his or her goal.

In your universe, wouldn't engineer man prove the official story of the WTC destruction? In which case, we would both like to see him identified. Another firefighter in the reddit post I linked said that the engineer claimed to come from the "Office of Emergency Management". Unfortunately, the largest OEM offices were at WTC 7 so it is possible that any trace of this guy's identity was destroyed along with the building he predicted would fall.

Had to mention engineer man because how how reminiscent he is of several other mysterious figures in JFK.