Micah Mileto

The FBI theorized it was a fragment from the head shot. The Warren Commission tried saying a whole 6.5 round could've hit there. That is impossible, because that would have made a large gash in the curb, not a fragment. See here:

The Bethesda autopsy pathologists, on the other hand, claimed the defects in the chest were shallow, only went through the skin. Reading the whole thing helps.

Ten medical professionals from Parkland totally agree that chest tubes were fully administered to the dying President

So this is the DPD equivelent of Hoover's "the public mist be convinced" memo?

All these years and no proof of a lone gunman, all points of argument have only become more in favor of a conspiracy. What more could be accomplished in the hours of the rest of the day?

So you're saying the skull flap on the Zapruder film was added in later?

Thank you!

Do you mean CE 567 (nose) and CE 569 (base)?

Isn't that for when a shot is taken from a mile away instead of 200-300 feet away?

http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/fragments/fragphotos.html CE 840 fragments from limo, Warren Commission Evidence: CE 840 in evidence today (missing 1 fragment): photo of 2 fragments found from underneath the left jump seat. Note: The FBI originally recovered three particles. In 1970, an independent researcher brought to the attention of the National Archives that one of the three fragments was missing. The Archives has been unable to locate it.

That would really be crazy if there were 2 instead of 3.

'' What is that handwritten notation in parentheses under "evidence received from Special Agent Orin Bartlett"?

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305165 Is this what that's referring to?

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57753&relPageId=25 Anybody have this clipping from the 12/30/1963 U.S. News and World Report?

In other words, the evidence for collusion isn't the nothing burger, the nothing burger is the hope for any prosecution.

If there will be no prosecutions, will this be considered a "conspiracy theory" now?

Who was the Secret Service agent who claimed to have seen Robert Bouck burn some autopsy photographs? Was it James Fox and was the more than one agent who said this? Edit: James Fox alledgedly told Mark Crouch. Bouck has denied this.

But there is plenty of evidence that the pathologists were aware of the throat wound as a bullet hole during the body examination. So that would be at least one lie on their part.

I wonder if the pathologists chose to lie about taking lung/interior body photographs.

If you can't trust the autopsy pathologists, and their main assistants are apparently telling 'big fish' stories, who can you trust?

Bob theorized that a bullet lodged into the right lung and this was somehow covered up. Not sure how it could've gotten out of the body before the x-rays were taken.

The Parkland Staff are probably telling the truth, and the "shallow chest cut" story from the autopsy pathologists was a ploy to cover up the full extent of the damage to the lungs and interior body. This also makes me wonder if the autopsy pathologists were literally acting and performing a charade in front of the morgue witnesses when they initially reported the back wound could only be probed a fraction of an inch. Shallow chest tubes, shallow back wound, shallow trustworthiness.

-deleted-

-deleted-

Were the chest tubes fully administered into JFK's body at Parkland Hospital, or were the chest cuts shallow like the autopsy pathologists claimed?