Micah Mileto

Must not be publicly available yet.

Where can this be seen?

https://www.dallasnews.com/news/obituaries/2019/09/14/robert-mcclelland-surgeon-who-tried-to-save-jfk-and-believed-there-was-a-second-shooter-dies-at-89/?fbclid=IwAR214dRdgVPWY17T-NGQgVBIEi5sG04-UlFAZ-5hxKOhvCKYHlN1V9IcKSg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7456521/Robert-F-Kennedy-assassinated-Thane-Eugene-Cesar-Sirhan-Sirhan-says-RFK-Jr.html

The Opera web browser has a free VPN option.

It's a matter of moral principal.

90% of media payed respect to George H.W. Bush when he died.

Whatever happened to "If it's on the internet, it stays there"? Conspiracy theorists are facing the worst crisis in information loss ever. Important information and videos are being deleted or becoming more and more hard to find, at least with a simple search engine result. Like I said, free speech is more important than taking on DVP. There is a crisis in free speech where people view the free speech amendment more as a handicap than a code of ethics. Most people would rather the keys to the world be handed over to Kyle's Mom from South Park.

I mean, free speech is a more important code of ethics than taking down DVP.

This 3D animation was shown at the mock trial of Oswald by the American Bar Association: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIuWT7EWE7s&t=32m25s

Pat Speer has a gigantic list of problems with Baden, under "Baden's reign of error" http://www.patspeer.com/chapter13b%3Aattackoftheclones

Not saying the back wound photo is fake, but at the time of the autopsy, the pathologists did seem to think the bullet which entered the back should have gone into the pleural cavity, and they seeked permission to examine the chest rather than the neck. That wouldn't make very much sense if the back wound was on the top of the shoulder.

The autopsy pathologists already downplayed their awareness of the throat wound at the time of the autopsy. Humes' phone call to Dr. Perry probably even happened that night, not the day after as we have been told.

Is it possible he made up the story based on something he read earlier about Oswald's shoes?

"People who question western government are a threat to western government"

The note is found in a box/folder/file along with various other unorganized materials. http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/box7.htm Box 7, Folder 10, # 26 Description: Note - handwritten, by an unknown author. Handwritten note, (Photocopy), date unknown. 00002288 1 page 07 10 026 2288-001.gif The circled 180 and 221 are not explained, however the official list of items from Oswald's pocket says his "torn" $1 bill had "300" written on it with pencil.

The only information on the two "half bills" is this unidentified note here, with no other context known: http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/22/2288-001.gif

Nobody knows where the "half bill" note came from or who owned the half bills. However, the official list of items found in Oswald's pocket lists a "torn" $1 bill with "300" written on it: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1317#relPageId=209&tab=page I am not aware of any pictures of this torn dollar bill, or the two "half bills".

Where did Armstrong say this?

-deleted

Top 9 problems with Johnny Brewer I know of: 1. Brewer's first statement was made on 12/6/63, two weeks after the assassination, not the same day or the day after, which would have been preferable for an important witness. 2. Brewer claimed to have SEEN, not heard, Police vehicles passing by a location where they almost certainly were not present. 3. Brewer claimed to have heard a description of the suspect on the radio BEFORE he saw the suspect, even though evidently no such description was circulating public airwaves at this time. 4. Brewer claimed to SEE the suspect enter the Texas Theater without buying a ticket, yet he also claimed to have asked the clerk if the suspect bought a ticket. 5. As summarized on harveyandlee.net: A very close friend of Jack Ruby's, Tommy Rowe, worked at Hardy's Shoe Store with Brewer. In 1964 Rowe told friends, relatives, and JFK researchers that it was he, NOT Brewer, who pointed out (HARVEY) Oswald to the police in the dark of the Texas Theater. Rowe was so close to Jack Ruby that Rowe moved into Ruby's apartment when Ruby went to jail for killing HARVEY Oswald. (Click here to see Midlothian Mirror editorial about Tommy Rowe.) (Click here for a 3/1/68 Los Angeles Free Press interview with Penn Jones and Roger Craig also discussing Tommy Rowe.) Unfortunately, Tommy Rowe was never interviewed by the DPD or FBI or WC or HSCA. It is worth repeating that in 1967 the New Orleans District Attorney's office interviewed Tommy Rowe, who lived in Apt. 206 at 223 S. Ewing (the same apartment occupied by Jack Ruby in 1963). Mr. Rowe said that he told shoe store manager Johnny Brewer that he saw a man wear­ing a brown shirt enter the Texas Theater on the afternoon of November 22, 1963. If Rowe's statement is true then Johnny Brewer never saw the man in the brown shirt in front of his store, enter the theater, nor did he point out (HARVEY) to the police. 6. When interviewed by Ian Griggs, Brewer claimed that two acquaintances were also present in the shoe store, who he would not identify besides to say they were employees of IBM. 7. As summarized by Gokay Hasan Yusuf on KennedysAndKing.com: When Ian Griggs interviewed Johnny Brewer in 1996, Brewer told him that he heard Oswald shout out "It's all over"; or words to that effect (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). But when Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, Brewer merely claimed that he heard some hollering, and that he couldn't make out exactly what Oswald said (WC Volume VII, page 6) 8. ibid: When Johnny Brewer testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he observed a gun in Oswald's hand aimed "up in the air" (WC Volume VII, page 6). During his interview with Ian Griggs in 1996, he now claimed that Oswald was trying to shoot McDonald in the head (Griggs, No Case to Answer, page 64). Yet, none of the other witnesses and the arresting Officers, let alone Nick McDonald, claimed that this is what they had seen during the scuffle. Moreover, Brewer's claim is directly contradicted by Charles Walker, who stated that the gun was pointed about waist high. 9. ibid: When Johnny Calvin Brewer, the shoe store manager who allegedly witnessed Oswald duck into the Theater without paying, testified before the Warren Commission on April 2, 1964, he claimed that he heard someone holler "He's got a gun" (ibid, page 6). Brewer explained that before he heard this, he had seen a gun "...come up and - in Oswald's hand, a gun up in the air" (ibid). But as discussed in part 1 of this writer's review of With Malice, this was most certainly a lie (see under the subheading VI: Closing in). Aside from Hill and Brewer, this writer knows of no other officer (or witness) who claimed that they heard someone yell out that Oswald had a gun. This writer is also unaware of any officer/witness who took credit for yelling out that Oswald had a gun.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qH7nnQ64pPzgZICanoPKjAQUtD6M8Mx5

Thank you for posting this. Newspaper archives really are like a doorway into another world not categorized by search engines. At one point, Google wanted to create a massive archive of of searchable scanned newspapers, but quickly abandoned the project.

James Files Ed Hoffman Jean Hill Richard Randolph Carr Beverly Oliver Tim Tilson Roger Craig Jerry Coley Acquilla Clemons Dr. Charles Crenshaw Audrey Bell Dr. Robert Livingston Robert Knudsen Dennis David Jerrol Custer Hugh Huggins This is just a short list of problematic witnesses off the top of my head. Now, most conspiracy researchers also tend to think some of these people are lying. Lying for attention. But what is a more powerful motivator to lie? Attention, or delivering your idea of justice for a dead President and Police officer? Somebody who personally believes in a lone gunman could fudge the facts just to reinforce what they already think everybody else should believe. For example, take the autopsy pathologists' experience dealing with the Justice Department and the HSCA forensic pathology panel. Attorney General Ramsey Clark believed in a lone gunman, yet he made Humes, Boswell, and Stringer sign a false statement claiming there had no reason to believe there were any missing autopsy photographs. The HSCA's Gary Cornwell and Dr. Charles Petty tried to intimidate Humes into agreeing with their theory of a higher entry wound in the head, and they both believed in a lone gunman.

Do you have a copy of that letter to show?