Micah Mileto

Any chance you could find the Nashville Banner article David referenced?

They saw the bruising on the strap muscles next to the trachea, yet they didn't realize until later there was a gunshot wound in that area?

I've been wondering what you think about the difference between Parkland and Bethesda over whether a full chest tube procedure was performed?

I don't know how well that would turn out, man. "Hey Trump, the JFK Assassination WAS accomplished by one guy! Just look at my blog!"

But Pat, the four particles of tissue that are in the same container as the nose fragment (collectively labled CE 567) are completely separate and there is no evidence that they were attached. I am aware of nothing from the 1960's FBI investigation that acknowledges the tissue. Robert Frazier claimed that he wiped BLOOD off of the nose fragment, he mentioned nothing about tissue, and I am not aware of any blood sample that was catalogued onto evidence. The 1990's FBI re-examination of CE 567 only found non-tissue fibers embedded on the nose fragment. The tissue could have been a totally separate artifact that was added later.

There's this great addition I noticed on Pat Speer's website: http://www.patspeer.com/chapter12c%3Aanimania

great summary!

In the version proposed by the Clark Panel/HSCA... not the actual doctors who spend hours handling JFK's skull. According to them, the small wound in the back of the head was too low to correspond to an entry for a single 6.5 shot from the Sixth Floor. Kind of blurs the lines between "scientific/peer reviewed" proof and "historically documented" proof.

There was some information about a possible hole in the floor of the Limousine. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57753&relPageId=25

Assuming there has been a kind of consensus that an ordinary 6.5 round could not fragment upon passing through one layer of skull, could it then fragment right as it encountered a second layer of skull? In that case, maybe the round could explode into several fragment before a portion of it actually exited.

Woah dude, there are posts here from people who have died. We gotta make screenshots and archives of some of this stuff, and share it.

Are you suggesting Bennett saw the back shot slightly after Altgens 6 was snapped? In that case, I have heard of no less than THREE different ways to use Bennett's statements to criticize the official story: A. Bennett's statements were intentionally fabricated B. Bennett saw the back hole created after Kennedy had already raised his hands towards his throat C. Bennett's statements can only be reconciled with the official story by theorizing a first missed shot - something Pat Speer's website put under heavy scrutiny. The only long-standing evidence for a first missed shot is Connally's quick right head turn. But nobody has proven that Connally's quick head turn is incompatible with casual movement in reaction to a crowd on onlookers.

I know John Hunt had that unfinished RFK book that will allegedly be published some time in the future, but I wonder if we'll ever get his full interviews with Robert Frazier! It would really be a shame if John Hunt died and his last words were "I asked Robert Frazier about the headshot fragments and other related issues and what he told me makes the case for tampering even stronger"

I have never heard about this before, beside this old obscure essay by John Hunt: http://the-puzzle-palace.com/files/JohnHunt.txt The Third Headshot fragment. The documentary record is clear: Two and only two fragments of lead were pulled from Kennedy's head during the autopsy. Sibert and O'Neill delivered those two fragments to Robert Frazier at the Firearms and Toolmarks section of the FBI Lab in Washington at 1:45 AM on the 23rd. A huge series of 4x5 negatives record the physical evidence collected by the FBI during the course of its investigation. These once-secret (and I'm confident the FBI thought it would remain that way for all time) FBI HQ Kennedy assassination Laboratory files are today accessible to you and me at he National Archives. Each manila negative envelope in the series covering the evidence handled by the P+C section is marked with Frazier's handwriting. One particular negative envelope reads "Q4/Q5 C4/C5," the FBI designations for the two headshot fragments removed at autopsy. The 4x5 black and white negative, which has been cut in half, is also marked by Frazier in red grease pen as "Q4/Q5 C4/C5." Three sizable and distinct bullet fragments appear in the photo, which has a scale placard included allowing us to determine the size of the fragments. In short, none of the fragments is an aliquot. The details of that are too lengthy to go into here and I defer any questions regarding that to those arising from a viewing of my presentation in the Wecht Symposium DVD. >From a previously unpublished FBI/WC evidence transfer log, we know that the Q4/Q5 fragments were delivered by Frazier's boss, Jay Cochran, Supervisor of the F+T section of the Lab to the WC against receipt, signed for by Assistant Counsel Melvin Eisenberg on March 16, 1964. Q4/Q5 are listed on the line item. Under the "Number Of Pieces" column is listed the quantity "3", which is exactly what they were; Three fragments of lead; Two from the autopsy and one from. Where did that "extra" fragment come from?? We can reasonably conclude that it didn't come from Kennedy's head. So who collected it?? Under what circumstances was it collected?? Where was it collected?? When was it delivered to the FBI Lab?? Was it handed to Frazier?? By whom?? Why is there no photograph of the two original Q4/Q5 "as received"?? Why is there no record of the Third Headshot fragment in the form of Lab reports or Memoranda?? On the day Frazier testified about the headshot fragments, Arlen Specter signed another previously unpublished evidence transfer log acknowledging receipt of the Q4/Q5 C4/C5 evidence. But now, two months later on May 13, 1964 under the quantity column we find the number "2". The third fragment was gone, and for good. I asked Robert Frazier about the headshot fragments and other related issues and what he told me makes the case for tampering even stronger. I wish I'd been able to find him before I went to Pittsburgh for my Wecht Symposium presentation would have been even stronger. ...From here What I have given you here are facts concerning evidence I found in the FBI' s own files. Over the course of two chapters in the book I'm working on I list the rest of the evidence not presented at Wecht related to The Harper fragment lead and the Third Headshot fragment, analyze it, look for possible innocent explanations, incorporate what Frazier and others have told me, then weave the FACTS into a cohesive theory as to what happened and what it all means. That I'll save for the book. There are those who will say that if I don't explain my theories here and now, that if I don't tell you what it all means, then what I've written must be ignored. I say, fine with me. Or they could just buy the Wecht Symposium DVD. None of that changes the FACT that what I have given you here are the facts. John Hunt

I think I have another T3 quote for your repertoire. From the Baltimore Sun, 11/25/1966: On the autopsy sketch drawn by Dr. Boswell are computations to locate the neck wound by measurement. Dr. Boswell used, as places of reference, the right acronmion process - the highest point on the shoulder bone that can be felt near the joint of the shoulder and collar bone - and the mastoid prominence - the base of the bone just behind the ear. He said these were standard reference points used in an such cases. He placed the wound at the intersection of 14 inch arcs described from these reference points. He said yesterday that he thought he had used a vertebra as a third reference point, but that this did not appear in the autopsy report or in the sketch. The sketch itself would normaly have been thrown away, he said, in any case but this one. "We didn’t anticipate this would have become as important as it did," he said. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=62495#relPageId=18&tab=page

Thank you.

From Best Evidence, 1992 signet edition afterward: In 1981, I received a letter from Maryland radio journalist Mark Crouch saying he knew someone who had a set of the autopsy photographs, the same photographs that were at the National Archives. He subsequently introduced me to James K. (“Jack’’) Fox, formerly a photographer with the Intelligence Division of the U.S. Secret Service. Documents from the House Assassinations Committee establish that Fox was one of a few officials who had access to the photographs. On three occasions, he supervised their processing. According to Fox, shortly after the assassination he was told by Secret Service Agent Roy Kellerman: “Here, make a set of these for yourself. They’ll be history someday.” Fox showed me the pictures he had, and later I was able to obtain a set.

1981

Is this the same Mark Crouch who befriended Secret Service Agent James Fox, and who leaked the autopsy photos? https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/delawareonline/obituary.aspx?n=mark-arnold-crouch&pid=183025950&fhid=6217 If not, when did Mark Crouch die?

Well, they never caught the guy that did it. So I totally can't take Walthers' later denials seriously. Because he had a bomb explode outside of his house around the time Jim Garrison was talking about extra bullets.

"In June, 1968, Walthers reported a bombing outside his home in Oak Cliff. That case is still under investigation" (Dallas Morning News, January 11, 1969)

Ever have the videos by Mark Oakes? http://www.lasthurrahbookshop.com/vidframe.html The video "ON THE TRAIL OF THE MYSTERY FBI MAN" apparently has Alvin Maddox of the DPD saying he actually saw a bullet which was recovered from the grass at south of Elm St.

His debates with Lone Nutters are hilarious, you can find them on Youtube.

Thanks!

Dave, I just wanted to ask, what was that news station that stated for a fact that shots were fired from the grassy knoll? I think they even had a diagram of the area.