Micah Mileto

Paul, if you want to promote the official story, why not just build your case on CE 567, the fragment with flesh and blood on it?

The nature of the back wound was apparently such that the autopsy pathologists chose to dissect the chest instead of the modified tracheotomy wound above it. And that was after they had to specifically ask permission to examine the chest instead of just the head. For some reason, they thought it was a better idea to excavate the CHEST for signs of a bullet to accommodate the back wound rather than check the neck area or ask the Parkland staff about it.

The only entrance wound identified in the back of the head was too low to correspond with a shot from the Sixth Floor. The autopsy pathologists placed the small head wound low in the occipital area, while the official story requires the entry exist in the right parietal area.

I posted it, but it was a fake.

1. Not very much evidence for a shot before z190-224 2. Connally always said he heard a loud report a moment before he felt himself being struck.

The autopsy wasn't botched, the truth was. How? Simple: the autopsy pathologists lied and claimed the were unaware that Kennedy's modified tracheotomy was a former bullet wound. You are the one who should be arguing the autopsy was botched, because if it wasn't, the doctors didn't share what they learned.

It is sad that the institute of copyright is prohibiting people from seeing what may be scientific proof exhonerating a claimed Marxist.

Hasn't it been pretty well shown that DeMohrenschildt had further dealings with the CIA than he admitted? If so, then he would have to be good at lying.

Fred Litwin: Transgender people are delusional Also Fred Litwin: https://i.imgur.com/MnOqSMa.png

I thought JFK researchers were all perfectly aware of the "every President after JFK being a criminal mass murderer" problem.

Some major breakthroughs in the case could be made for less than the price of one of these yearly propaganda specials.

Thanks

The wounds as originally described can only be compatible with a conspiracy. That's more than a suggestion. Even if there was no cover-up of a "second entrance wound" (by the way, many lone nutters like Larry Sturdivan and Lawrence Angel believe there was a cover up of a "second exit wound" in the forehead above the right eye), there was still at least 3 square inches of missing bone and scalp that may have contained evidence we will never see.

Bullet entered "back of head", exited through "top of skull". Large defect in the "vertex", smaller wound in the "occiput". The verbiage here implies the small head wound was situated sharply below the large head wound and the corresponding "exit" point. The Rydberg drawings show exactly this. The autopsy pathologists knew that a bullet path from the small head wound to the large head wound would be upwards, not downwards.

No clue of any guy named Jepson involved in the 60's investigations.

If Bardwell Odum had really obtained the bullet to show to Darrel Tomlinson and O.P. Wright, wouldn't his name be on that envelope?

Dr. George Burkley either suspected or believed that Kennedy may have been struck in the head by more than one missile. He was not called by the warren commission to testify about his experience beginning at the motorcade, at the Dallas emergency room, in Maryland for the autopsy, etc; he only wrote a 11/23/1963 Death Certificate and a 11/27/1963 affidavit which did not mention any specific evidence about the head wounds except the fact that they were fatal. In this 10/17/1967 interview at the Kennedy Library, Burkley stated "My conclusion in regard to the cause of death was the bullet wound which involved the skull. The discussion as to whether a previous bullet also enters into it, but as far as the cause of death the immediate cause was unquestionably the bullet which shattered the brain and the calvarium". The interviewer did not bring up the possibility of more than one gunshot to Kennedy's head, Burkley did. Independently. When asked "Do you agree with the Warren Report on the number of bullets that entered the President's body?", he replied "I would not care to be quoted on that". Then, a 3/18/1977 memo from Dr. Burkley's attorney said "he has information in the Kennedy assassination indicating that others besides Oswald must have participated", and that Burkley would be available to interview. A short August 1977 interview report written by Dr. Purdy of the HSCA medical panel reads "Dr. BURKLEY said the doctors didn't section the brain and that if it had been done, it might be possible to prove whether or not there were two bullets. Dr. BURKLEY thinks there was one but concedes the possibility of there having been two". Burkley then gave a 11/12/1978 affidavit to the HSCA saying "Had the Warren Commission deemed to call me, I would have stated why I retained the brain and the possibility of two bullets having wounded President John F. Kennedy's brain would have been eliminated", "I supervised the autopsy and directed the fixation and retention of the brain for future study of the course of the bullet or bullets". And finally, author Henry Hurt interviewed Burkley in 1982 (Reasonable Doubt, page 49): It is significant that Dr. Burkley had been with the President in Dallas, with him in the Parkland Hospital emergency room, with his body as it was flown east, and present during the autopsy. It is also significant that even though he was the only doctor present both at Parkland and at Bethesda, Dr. Burkley's testimony was never taken by the Warren Commission, nor was it taken later by the House Select Committee. In 1982 Dr. Burkley told the author in a telephone conversation that he believed that President Kennedy's assassination was the result of a conspiracy. This startling statement, after so long a silence, amplified an obscure exchange Dr. Burkley had in an oral-history interview on file at the Kennedy Library in Boston. [...] When he originally telephoned the author, Dr. Burkley expressed his willingness to discuss various matters concerning the assassination. He asked for a letter detailing the areas the author wished to discuss. Dr. Burkley acknowledged receipt of the letter with a letter of his own. Two months later, the author proposed a meeting with Dr. Burkley to discuss the points. The doctor responded with an abrupt refusal to discuss any aspect of the case.

face sheet diagram: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=582 "TOTAL BODY XRAY AND AUTOPSY REVEALED ONE BULLET ENTERED BACK OF HEAD AND THEREAFTER EMERGED THROUGH TOP OF SKULL. PIECE OF SKULL MEASURING TEN BY SIX POINT FIVE CENTIMETERS LATER FLOWN IN FROM DALLAS HOSPITAL AND XRAYS BETHESDA DISCLOSED MINUTE METAL FRAGMENTS IN THIS PIECE WHERE BULLET EMERGED FROM SKULL" -sibert and o'neill 2:00 AM memo "Dr. HUMES stated that the pattern was clear...", "...a second high velocity bullet had entered the rear of the skull and had fragmentized prior to exit through the top of the skull" -sibert and o'neill report "Situated in the posterior scalp approximately 2. 5 cm. laterally to the right and slightly above the external occipital protuberance is a lacerated wound measuring 15 x 6 mm", "Upon reflecting the scalp multiple complete fracture lines are seen to radiate from both the large defect at the vertex and the smaller wound at the occiput", "...the above described small occipital wound...", "The fatal missile entered the skull above and to the right of the external occipital protuberance" -autopsy protocol "Sections through the wounds in the occipital and upper right posterior thoracic regions are essentially similar." -autopsy supplemental report Rydberg drawings: https://i0.wp.com/jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/JFK-Illustration-1.png?w=530 There is no "above" in "above and behind". The "above" part is debunked for sure.

Thanks you. Now I'm trying to see what name is under Gallagher. Finagian? Also, anybody know who Jepson is?

Any cursive readers? What are the named on the slip?

By the way, can anybody read and type exactly what this card says? https://history-matters.com/essays/frameup/EvenMoreMagical/images/Slide12.GIF

FBI Agent Elmer Todd on 11/22/1963: I carved my initials onto the nose of the bullet. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=10408#relPageId=295&tab=page Elmer Todd on 6/24/1964: This appears to be the same bullet, and I can see my initials on the bullet. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=59607#relPageId=86&tab=page https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1140#relPageId=430&tab=page One magic boi: https://imgur.com/a/mWtC3GY

Can we get some screenshots of the 3d animation from the conference?

Not saying the throat defect was physically enlarged before the autopsy, but the autopsy pathologists still certainly lied when pleading ignorance on the throat wound. Here's just one point of evidence out of several: the 1967 cbs memo. Robert Richter was the associate producer for the multi-part TV special A CBS News Inquiry: The Warren Report (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWtb2JwzkM8&), which aired 6/25-28/1967. In a 1/10/1967 CBS internal memo (https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=597) to executive producer of special projects Les Midgley, Richter discloses information attributed to Jim Snyder of the network's Washington bureau. "Jim Snyder of the CBS bureau in D.C. told me today he is personally acquainted with Dr. Humes. They go to the same church and are personally friendly. Snyder also knows Humes' boss in Bethesda; he is a neighbor across the street from Snyder. Because of personal relationships Snyder said he would not want any of the following to be traced back to him; nor would he feel he could be a middleman in any CBS efforts to deal with Hume." [...] "Snyder said he has spoken with Humes about the assassination. In one conversation Humes said one X-ray of the Kennedy autopsy would answer many questions that have been raised about the path of the bullet going from Kennedy's back through his throat. Humes said FBI agents were not in the autopsy room during the autopsy; they were kept in an ante room, and their report is simply wrong. Although initially in the autopsy procedure the back wound could only be penetrated to finger length, a probe later was made---when no FBI men were present---that traced the path of the bullet from the back going downward, then upward slighlty, then downward again exiting at the throat. One X-ray photo taken, Humes said, clearly shows the above, as it was apparently taken with a metal probe stick of some kind that was left in the body to show the wound's path. Humes said that a wound from a high-power rifle, once it enters a body, causes muscle, etc. to separate and later contract; thus the difficulty in initially tracing the wound's path in the case of Kennedy. Also, once a bullet from a high power rifle enters a body, its course can be completely erratic; a neck wound could result in a bullet emeging in a person's leg or anywhere else. Humes refused to discuss with Snyder the "single-bullet" theory in which the Warren Commision contends the same bullet described above went thru both Kennedy and Gov. Connally." Humes did later appear on a CBS special on the Kennedy assassination(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8VmRC3-lp8&t=24m59s), but there is no mention of this alleged x-ray film. While this information would be considered hearsay, it should be noted that individuals in the media industry such as CBS executives would be more likely to have an incentive for accuracy. When Humes was asked at his 2/13/1996 ARRB deposition(http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/humesa.htm) "...Do you recall any photograph or X-ray that was taken with a probe inserted into the posterior thorax?", Humes replied "No, absolutely not. I do not have a recollection of such". In Dr. Boswell's 2/26/1996 ARRB deposition(http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/boswella.htm), he was asked "*Were any photographs taken with the probe inserted?*", and he said "*I doubt it*". Dr. Finck was likewise asked at his 5/24/1996 ARRB deposition(http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/fincka.htm) "Do you have any recollection of photographs being taken with probes inserted into the wounds?", and responded "I don't". Autopsy photographer John Stringer recalled a “long metal probe” being “inserted in the throat wound in the front of the neck,” but couldn’t recall if any photos had been taken (ARRB MD 227, Call Report, Interview of John T. Stringer, April 8, 1996, pp.2–3; ARRB Transcript of Proceedings, Deposition of John T. Stringer, July 16, 1996, pp.72–73). Stringer’s assistant, Floyd Riebe, was asked by the ARRB on 5/7/1997 “Do you recall whether a photograph was taken while there was a probe in the body?” Riebe answered, “I don’t think so.” (ARRB Transcript of Proceedings, Deposition of Floyd Albert Riebe, May 7, 1997, pp.38–39). The CBS memo adds one extra detail that could still establish it's importance: "Humes also said he had orders from someone he refused to disclose--other than stating it was not Robert Kennedy--to not do a complete autopsy. Thus the autopsy did not go into JFK's kidney disease, etc." This could be a clue in vertifying this memo as being at least partially based off the private words of Dr. Humes. The level of restriction or interference placed on the medical professionals at Bethesda Naval Hospital during the body examination is an extensive discussion itself, but it is certain that there was no publicly available knowledge about it in 1967. All the publicly available knowledge about the JFK autopsy in 1967 (The 1964 Warren Commission report, it's twelve volumes, the FBI reports, and some exclusive stories from news media) did not specifically address why important procedures and details were missing from the autopsy and the record of it. While there does exist a 11/26/1963 memo by FBI agents Sibert and O'Neill(https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=687) that briefly discusses the "partial/complete autopsy" issue, this item was only publicly released in 1978 via FOIA to author David Lifton (Best Evidence, Part IV: What, When, and Where?, Chapter 19. Certain Preliminary Examinations), and then reprinted in 1979 by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) Volume VII (7), Medical Panel Report, Section II. Performance of Autopsy, Part II. Facts and Issues (https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=82#relPageId=20&tab=page)). Dr. Finck's 2/24/1969 testimony at the trial of Claw Shaw (http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/finckshaw.htm) was the first time the public was provided any description of how the autopsy could have been interfered with. One day later, the New York Times published the article pointing out that "the autopsy would not qualify as a 'complete' autopsy by the standards of the American Board of Pathology because of certain restrictions which were imposed, including not dissecting out the entire bullet track through the base of the neck on the right side".