-
Posts
4,737 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Michael Clark
-
New Questions For Paul Trejo
Michael Clark replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Just messin wit ya! Any luggage tags to prove that you were in the Czech Republic?- 71 replies
-
- Roscoe White
- General Walker
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
New Questions For Paul Trejo
Michael Clark replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Ticket stub pic. , or it didn't happen...- 71 replies
-
- Roscoe White
- General Walker
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
New Questions For Paul Trejo
Michael Clark replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I find Trejo's use, just now, of a death notice thread of a forum member, to defend his contested claims, to be distasteful, to say the least.- 71 replies
-
- Roscoe White
- General Walker
-
(and 5 more)
Tagged with:
-
Roger that, I was just thinking in terms of when things don't go as planned. Cheers, Michael
-
I can't see Americans being used unless they could be painted as Communists. Known Mafia hired hands just wouldn't work, unless the plotters were interested in a wholesale take-down of organized crime. Cheers, Michael
-
Just in case, I was using "you" as the universal "you", not referring to Michael Walton. I should had said "when a person studies LHO.....", or " when one studies LHO". It refers to myself as well. I've read plenty on LHO and I consider any time that I spent researching LHO, beyond the point where I was convinced he didn't do it, a waste of time. Cheers, Michael
-
Sorry, I meant Holt.
-
Thanks George, Harrelson and Rogers have always been been solid ID's for me. The old guy looks just like Hunt to me except for his age. I was unaware or Holt mob connection. I find it hard to believe that Rogers was the one to actually dissected his parents, wrapped them up, and put them in the fridge. Cheers, Michael
-
Ken Burns tackles the Vietnam War
Michael Clark replied to Douglas Caddy's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
That Trump dig at the end of the article did nothing but infuriate Veterans in the comments section. How could they be so stupid to let that little, irrelevant diddy remain in that article? The divisiveness just escalates. Cheers, Michael -
Just wondering Tommy. No, you don't HAVE to have a prevailing theory. You've been at this a long time, I just figured that you did, or would. To be sure, do you have a position on LHO having fired THE shots or any shots. Again, I don't mean to persist in finding a label for you. I would just be surprised if, on that item, you did not have a position. Cheers, Michael
-
Tommy, not to derail your thread, but, is there a thread that explains where you sit, in your theory, that is? You mock the Deep-state stuff, which, I think, rules out the CIA; I don't think your a nutter, and you don't seem to embrace Paul's theory. Can you sum-up where you are at, or direct me to where I can see your position? Cheer, Michael
-
This thread... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/21616-edgar-eugene-bradley/#comment-294438 Contains this document: http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/T Disk/Turner William Weyand Garrison File/Item 13.pdf in which two Tramps are identified as Clinton Wheat and Gene Bradley
-
Wynne and Vicki, Southland Center 1963
Michael Clark replied to Andrej Stancak's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Agreed, Tracy. I have failed to find any sources for the Southland Center, apart from Wynne's. Thanks for confirming that it is not out there. Cheers, Michael -
Thanks, I shudder at what were the incremental plans for the Cabinet Plane that was flying over the Pacific at the time. Plan B: return to Hawaii, all air traffic shut down??? Defecto sequestration. Plan C: Return to Hawaii: Sort, incarcerate the cabinet, and forward the perps and conspitors to Washington? Plan D: A Cuban "fishing boat" in the Pacific with an anti-aircraft missile? It gets ugly when one considers what might have happened if the LN plan did not work. Cheers, Michael
-
Interesting after-thought. Of course there would be no physical Communist credentials on them. There would have to have been intelligence profiles which would quickly (sound familiar) identify them as such. Perhaps evidence of those profiles, and of that plot, existed as long as, and were useful for blackmail in, The Watergate Coup. Cheers, Michael
-
My last post is not relevant. I just dropped a quote here for further use. But this whole scenario is developing well for me. Suppose that multiple shooters failed to kill JFK in Dealy Plaza (as it was, things went so well that they were able to claim a LN scenario). As I said above, more aggressive attacks had to be ready at the underpass and beyond. There HAD to be more Cubans to blame; a veritable pile of Patsies. What has led me back here is the Weitzman-Barker encounter on the knoll, and, of course, Dark Complectioned Man. They had to be there to follow-up, and fall if necessary. Everything was in place, the Pro Castro, LN, LHO; and a pile of Anti Castro Cubans were back-up. Were the Anti-Castro Cubans set-up with Communist credentials? Surely they must have been, or a world of hurt would have come down on Cuban exiles and an excuse to invade Cuba would be a difficult case to make. Those Credentials and covers for the B, C and D team are, or were, evidence, clues. Surely those clues are no longer in existence or even detecible now. Cheers, Michael *** I just re-read everything and figured-out that I am repeating myself ;). There's nothing like confirming your own genius! xa-xa-xa !!!