Michael Clark

Ron, I opened a Research Storage thread in the JFK Research subforum for this purpose. I can quickly grab threads quotes or links and drop them in the reply boxes that I have reserved on that thread. I add, sort and remove stuff on occasion. Feel free to grab/reserve a bunch of reply boxes on that thread if you want.

Mathias Makes a great case that Debunks Walker-did-it zealotry. I was going to reply to the thread from which Mathias' came, but I decided to start a new one. It wasn't Walker, and Dallas was the last shot at the possibility for a clean coup. Kennedy had to be killed before the Vietnam pull out was announced and before the Bobby Baker scnadal broke. If JFK had cancelled his trip to Dallas, something highly reckless, and possibly looking like an overt coup would have been implemented; something like a re-purposed Operation Northwoods, or backfired Operation Mongoose would have been put into play. The Dallas-with-LHO plan, that did not devolve into fall-back plans B, C and D, in Dallas, was the last chance for a clean, deniable coup that could be covered-up. Walker had no control over the length, width and breadth of the Dallas set-up, hit, cover, or fall-back, in Dallas, or elsewhere, nor alternate, reckless Mongoose or Northwoods based faranken-hit and coup options.

.Mathias Baumann posted: .......the assassination could have happened anywhere. Think of the plots that failed in Chicago and Tampa. It was probably just a stroke of luck that it worked in Dallas. I just chanced upon his highly interesting article that gives a lot of background information on the previous plots I'd been looking for a long time: https://kennedysandking.com/john-f-kennedy-articles/the-three-failed-plots-to-kill-jfk-the-historians-guide-on-how-to-research-his-assassination The similarities are striking: Chicago Tampa

Another important thread was getting off topic so I opened this new one.

Test Robert, I am seeing the same URL for both of those Links.

...

...

...

...

...

...

....

...

...

...

The Camera Eye Rush This Song demonstrares masterful use of common Poetic devices such as assonance, alliteration, plosives, and I can't even remember the names for many more. Lyrics Grim-faced and forbidding Their faces closed tight An angular mass of New Yorkers Pacing in rhythm Race the oncoming night They chase through the streets of Manhattan Head-first humanity Pause at a light Then flow through the streets of the city They seem oblivious To a soft spring rain Like an English rain So light, yet endless From a leaden sky, yeah The buildings are lost In their limitless rise My feet catch the pulse And the purposeful stride I feel the sense of possibilities I feel the wrench of hard realities The focus is sharp in the city ------ Wide-angle watcher On life's ancient tales Steeped in the history of London Green and Grey washes In a wispy white veil Mist in the streets of Westminster Wistful and weathered The pride still prevails Alive in the streets of the city Are they oblivious To this quality? A quality Of light unique to every city's streets Pavements may teem With intense energy But the city is calm In this violent sea I feel the sense of possibilities I feel the wrench of hard realities The focus is sharp in the city

...

...

...

That is absolutely fascinating Jim. My apologies to you Jim, but I have to ask the following rhetorical question, not to you, but to the wind... Why can't Paul Trejo bring anything, ever, new to the table. His signature says that his interest is in "research" into General Walker. Yet he neverstarts a thread with anything new or interesting. He says he has access to all of Walkers papers but nothing ever is presented from that trove. All we get is his muddying the waters of other threads, with the same stuff, over and over. Mr. Root, I am looking forward to seeing more from you. Cheers, Michael

You are a zealot...... your comments and positions are the archetype for zealotry.. ------------------------ Paul Trejo wrote: Kathy, it's been 72 hours, so I presume it's OK to begin posting here again. My first post is a question to you, as Administrator. Why do you propose to be done with this thread? It seems to me that the thread has its own energy, and points are still being debated, and new information is still being presented. In my view, there is no way to make a summary at this time -- unless it's a one-sided and biased summary. Why would anyone wish to suppress further discussion on the topic of Harry Dean's account of the JFK murder? I don't understand. Please enlighten me. Best regards, --Paul Trejo ---------------------------- Kathy wrote: I am not going to do anything with it. It is a part of the Forum. Nor am I trying to suppress anything. It's a same old, same old. You are at a stalemate. If you want to start a new thread about a specific topic , no one is stopping you, but it needs to be specific.If you need to draw from this thread for a point on the other thread, use a link to the specific post or posts you are referencing. If you want to define your position, so folks will know what you think, so you don't have to type it over and over, I suggest that a blog would be ideal. You could put a link to it in your signature area, and anyone who wished could follow. -------------------------------- -------------------------------- Paul, you should take Kathy's advice and start a blog. You could unload your tome their, and you won't have to leave your drivel around the forum. I know you don't have much to say, you simply say the same thing over and over and over. If you express yourself on your blog, you can simply remind us where we can find it, with a link. You risk jamming another thread shut like the one from which I quoted above. There is no need for that. GET A BLOG!

HECTOR But value dwells not in particular will; It holds his estimate and dignity As well wherein 'tis precious of itself As in the prizer: 'tis mad idolatry To make the service greater than the god And the will dotes that is attributive To what infectiously itself affects, Without some image of the affected merit. Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida