Cory Santos

He is not happy about the comparison either. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/super-bowl-media-day-question-brock-purdy-lee-harvey-oswald_n_65c419bce4b093b2e7822786/amp

https://amp.tmz.com/2024/02/07/49ers-quarterback-brock-purdy-lee-harvey-oswald-compare-look-alike-jfk/

He later said he felt the shooting was the work of a government agency. My point is did his putting this ad out have anything to do with his shooting-as he suggested- or was it merely a “strange coincidence” he was shot weeks after the ad? If yes then it is fair to say he solved the mystery of whether there was a conspiracy in that they tried to get him. If no, it was a “strange coincidence” then he did not solve it. In other words, what happened to him either solved it or it did not solve it by drawing conspirators-if there were conspirators- out to attack him.

This was published in January 1978. Two months later in March …. Was this a “strange coincidence” which I refer to in my writings or something more? https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth339362/

I will. I actually watched it when I was in LA the other day.

Yes, if you go on YouTube both part 2 and 3 have been up. Has DVP watched them yet?

So did Jay Epstein. Weeks ago.

Will DVP take the time to watch and consider?

Interesting interview. https://www.foxla.com/video/1397940

Perhaps this is what you are referring to? https://www.universalroyaltyco.com/john-f-kennedy-texas-oil/

Correct he was not there at that time and the photos are not of him. He was there the night before and early that morning which is nothing more than what I have written about being a “strange coincidence”.

Again, I know this already so no I do not need to do anything. What you need to do, respectfully, is provide proof that it was him instead of just your opinion.

Thank you Leslie. I do not think DVP knew he was in Dallas. David did you know this?

Please explain how in your mind Pres. Bush benefitted from the JFK assassination. Btw actor Bill Paxton was there that day and he later starred in Terminator, Aliens, and Twister but died young. Did he also benefit from the assassination and then get silenced? This is all indeed merely a coincidence and nonsense to suggest it is not without any proof other than them being in Dallas. Again, I believe Jim D did not think highly of Baker’s book so I am not sure why it is being cited as indisputable authority here.

And he was asked about it and it was looked into. It is not the same Bush. There is zero evidence it was. If there was please share.

Thank you but I have heard these points before. I have yet to see evidence of anything. Just people’s opinions and interpretations of the above. What you call “suspicious” I call a coincidence. If you think former Pres. Bush was in the CIA prior to 1976 then prove it with evidence, not “well he was associated with X and X was in the CIA so….” Associations like that are not proof. Moreover, I think, though could be wrong, did not Jim DiEugenio give Baker’s book a bad review?

But former Pres. Bush was in Dallas the night before and the morning of 11-22-63 (this is a mere innocent strange coincidence which means nothing.) Then he went to Tyler for his speech earlier on the morning of 11-22-63. As for the article it was the Dallas news and I believe the article addresses the Pres. Ford visit.

Dallas morning news article I thought addressed this. Also, coincidence? Lol, I think not. https://bushofficial.com/tour_moreinfo&event_id=144233665&site_id=bush2020

No it’s fine.

I am surprised you did not know this https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2023/11/22/since-jfk-assassination-no-us-president-has-visited-dallas-dealey-plaza/?outputType=amp https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2013/11/richard-nixon-november-22-1963/

You posted that letter and did not note that he had, though innocently, been in Dallas that morning before going to Tyler. Your post makes it look like he was never in Dallas. You know better as to where he was but some people might come on here and not know this. Context and perspective are important don’t you think?

He was not because he had nothing to do with it and no one has any evidence that he did.

Then why did you post disinformation?

What time were they killed approximately?

Reiner just addressed this on the 11th episode by explaining how Biden’s administration really is the reason the records will never be seen by the public.