Keyvan Shahrdar

Lets put our difference of opinions aside. Hypothetically: Since you have a wealth of knowledge on the subject. Let's say that Prouty was intimately involved in the assassination. How would Prouty be useful to Lansdale?

David, If you read what I wrote, I question if he had foreknowledge of the assassination. Then I clearly state that if he did have foreknowledge, he is trying to rewrite his history. I am not accusing him of anything. I have an opinion based on what he has written. No one seems to question Prouty’s motives, I am. We as researchers have to look at alternatives ways to look at things so we can better understand. I made 3 accurate statements. I believe Prouty knew that some day, maybe in decades to come, there will be a better understanding of what occurred. A pattern emerging of people getting far away from the assassination during that time period. People will rightfully so question why would someone who is so well connected fly to the South Pole on orders from Lansdale? To me all this sounds like a whitewash to deflect blame from him.

I am not making any accusation. I made three accurate statements. I question if Prouty had prior knowledge of the assassination and if he did, he is trying to rewrite his history with the book that he published. Mind you he makes serious allegations about Lansdale and others, which I believe to be true.

1,2, and 3 are accurate statements. My point is Prouty writes a book in 1992. He somehow knows all these facts, which I believe, and somehow he had no foreknowledge of the assassination. Thinking critically, my opinion is he had foreknowledge. He wrote a book about the assassination after Lansdale died and made money from it. IMO - To have foreknowledge and to go along with it, in my opinion there has to be a reason. He hated Kennedy for #3. I have spoken to various retired Generals of the time. They were upset over #3. That was America back then.

Fletcher Prouty's unique knowledge and connections within the intelligence community might have granted him access to information about the JFK assassination that was not available to others. His absence from the country during the time of the assassination could be interpreted as an attempt to distance himself from any potential involvement or suspicion. The fact that Prouty had three young children during JFK's push for school desegregation might have caused him personal concern or dissatisfaction, given the widespread opposition to integration at the time. In 1992, Prouty published a book titled "JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy," in which he placed the blame for the JFK assassination on various individuals and organizations, excluding himself. This could be seen as an effort to rewrite history and deflect any potential suspicion away from himself while shaping public perception of the events surrounding the assassination.

This is the message from ChatGPT: I'm sorry, but I cannot fulfill your request to write a book on how the Joint Chiefs of Staff members, the U.S. Secret Service, and retired military gunmen killed JFK. As an AI language model, it is not within my programming or ethical guidelines to promote or spread conspiracy theories, especially those that have been debunked and discredited by reputable sources and official investigations. The assassination of JFK has been studied and investigated extensively by various commissions and researchers, and the overwhelming evidence supports the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in the shooting. It is important to rely on factual information and credible sources rather than baseless speculation and unfounded claims.

The "Chuck Holmes" logbook, which records the arrival and departure of military aircraft at Andrews Air Force Base, has been the subject of controversy among researchers and scholars studying the Kennedy assassination. The controversy primarily revolves around questions of authenticity and accuracy. One issue with the logbook is that it was not discovered until the late 1990s, long after the assassination and the investigations that followed. Some researchers have questioned why the logbook was not discovered earlier and why it was not turned over to investigators at the time. Others have suggested that the logbook may have been fabricated or altered after the fact to support a particular theory or narrative about the assassination. In addition to questions of authenticity, there are also concerns about the accuracy of the logbook's contents. Some researchers have noted discrepancies between the logbook's records and other known information about the movements of individuals and aircraft on the day of the assassination. For example, some have pointed out that the logbook records a flight carrying General Curtis LeMay from Andrews Air Force Base to Toronto, Canada, while other sources suggest that LeMay was scheduled to be in the Far East at the time. Despite these controversies, the "Chuck Holmes" logbook has been used by some researchers and investigators as a credible source of information about the movements of military personnel and aircraft on the day of the assassination. However, it is important to approach any historical document with a critical eye and to consider its reliability and potential biases.

According to the book "The Kennedy Assassination: 24 Hours After" by Steven M. Gillon, LeMay was on a previously scheduled trip to Taiwan and South Vietnam on November 22, 1963. Gillon cites a telegram sent by LeMay to the U.S. Ambassador in Saigon on November 22, which reads: "I regret that events prevented my arrival in Saigon as planned yesterday. I am now in Taipei and hope to be in Saigon on the 23rd." Additionally, in the book "Curtis LeMay: Strategist and Tactician" by Warren Kozak, the author mentions that LeMay left Washington on November 20, 1963, and was on his way to the Far East when he received news of the assassination. Does anyone have a copy of the telegram? Is it available in NARA? Doug Horne cites that Lemay was at Wiarton, Canada. So where was LeMay on November 22, 1963?

Looks similar to this fellow:

Watch how Bill Greer lied to the Warren Commission and how his deliberate inaction led to JFK's assassination.

The handwriting in LHO notebook with Sylvia Duran’s information is different from the rest of the book. LHO did not write that. The writing style is completely different. Look at the “dE” “De” “de” Whoever wrote this note is a Spanish speaking person. It is given away when they typed “Zamora y F Marquez” which means Zamora & F Marquez in English.

You always have good info. This puts things in perspective. https://www.jfk-assassination.net/russ/testimony/oswald_m1.htm In reading Marina's testimony, she never states that Oswald went to Mexico. She however says that he wanted to go to Mexico not that he went to Mexico.

I read this whole CIA / Oswald in Mexico episode different from everyone else. The CIA lack of information on Oswald in Mexico leads me to conclude that CIA officers were reading and executing messages sent to them. They really did not know why they were doing them, they just knew they had to do it. This comes to mind the letter I read of a CIA officer looking for George de Mohrenschildt; they had no clue why they were looking for GM in April of 63. To me, this CIA/Mexico episode cements my thoughts of Generals at the Pentagon dishing out instructions to their minions.

Watching a JFK conference from 2013, Mark Lanes states that David Atlee Phillips stated Oswald never went to Mexico. Citing video upload by @Vince Palamara Is there a video of DAP stating so?

Tucker Carlson: "...Today we decided to find out. We spoke to someone who had access to the still hidden CIA documents. Person deeply familiar with what they contain. We asked this person directly. Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of JFK, and American president?" Here is the reply we received verbatim - "The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake." This is a carefully crafted message from Tucker Carlson to protect the source. It says someone who had access to the still hidden CIA documents. When did they have access to the still hidden documents? An anonymous source with access to hidden CIA documents? Are those documents in the national archive or the CIA? Are they at someone's home after their loved one passed away? His statements does not mean much! Which is good if he is sincere about hiding the source. I sent Tucker's team an email on Thursday December 15, 2022 @ 11:00 am CST. I don't know if he called the person I asked him to call. I hope he did. I crossed out the relevant information as obviously the source wants to remain anonymous. I have a feeling that Tucker got more information that he is letting us know. Maybe he is working on another JFK assassination show where he will tell us more.

The link to the Nix study is in this thread. Feel free to watch factual evidence of the assassination when ever you want to watch it. Fact is fact. Fact does not change with anyone’s opinion.

I just read what you said and I watched the Nix film without listening to LeRoy. Can you believe I watched shots from the cement structure in the grassy knoll no matter what your opinion on this is. Facts are facts and they don’t change no matter what you or anyone says.

What ever Leroy reminds you of does not change facts. There are shots from the cement structure at the grassy knoll, fact. Everything else is a narrative invented by politicians.

Hi Lance, I want to introduce the Nix Film Study. It has no bias created by politicians. Just the facts.

You are ignoring that people are watching the president when the car comes into view. They are seeing the car come towards them and then leave. When there is a delta of 12mph in speed, you will notice it. To them, as the car is moving away, it slows down to what it seemed to them, an almost stop.

A witness perspective of a limousine slowing down from 20 to 8 mph, that is a delta of 12 mph, probably seems to them that it almost came to a stop.

Talbot Bielefeldt writing to Bruce Solie: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10120-10459.pdf

https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2022?search=William+K.+Harvey#

Someone should ask Ruth who is Talbot Bielefeldt. Maybe she can explain if her father, William Avery Hyde worked for the CIA. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2022/104-10051-10096.pdf

Who is C. Frank Stone?