Leslie Sharp
-
Posts
2,131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Leslie Sharp
-
-
4 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
Thank you for confirming his accuracy!
Spin this all you wish, Matthew. You're fooling no one — well, almost no one.
-
4 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
Unfortunately, the word I wanted to use for the leader of the Third Reich is censored here. Perhaps you didn’t know?!
If I can ask, why have responsible historians - amateur or otherwise - tolerated this absurd ban? Why not simply delete posts that use the terms as weapons? This is the tail wagging the dog and the historical record suffers as a result.
-
3 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
And there it is, there is truth to it.. you were bulling someone on this forum with PTSD into deleting there posts here. Now you are doing the same to people who don't share your wacky partisan political bias.
I was holding Monty accountable for his agreement with Hank, on behalf of Hank and his co-authors and the project. It was a business issue, nothing personal. I implored Monty to only remove those posts that related to the non-disclosure issues because I could see just from glancing at the thread he was provided invaluable research. Unfortunately he opted to delete all. I had no control over that decision.
Satisfied?
-
5 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
The fact that you feel no need to explain this tells me that there is a lot of truth to it. Rather ironic that you are up to your usual tactics or character assassination (He Suffers from PTSD) I believe what he wrote about you bulling him is true given that's basically what you have been doing with people who fail to agree with your off base characterization.
The way the forum works is you either ask for a post that violates forum rules to be removed by the poster and if they refuse to the mods are supposed look at it and if it breaks rules they will take it down. SO, you need to cite my rant because I don't remember going on a misogynistic rant and it appears that you have moved on to gaslighting.
Projection.
Ask Chris to explain the phenomenon to you.
Before your little match lights a brush fire, Monty was revealing information that fell under a non-disclosure agreement with Hank. The book had not been published and he wasn't familiar with the context or the full significance of what he was posting.
No need for you to stir the pot because it's all good now. Monty is fearless, an incredible researcher with a grasp of the big picture (while you muddle around with alt-right soundbite info on this thread), and I consider him a good friend.I challenge you to post some of your independent research into the assassination of Kennedy in Dallas on this thread, relevant to the inevitable end result of the past [60] years.
-
On 3/11/2023 at 9:42 AM, Matthew Koch said:
During the 2016 election cycle Democratic Operatives were caught paying people to stir up trouble at Trump rallies so that the media could make stories about MAGA supporters being violent racists.. That is where the Trump is a fascist narrative started. I tried finding the video on Youtube but YouTube for an obvious reason mixes Project veritas's videos up and so I can't find it by going back, the left censorship on search engines is getting out of control and is starting to look like 1984
https://apnews.com/article/670714b83d3d437ab5e22d5a1ae7db4a
https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2016/oct/19/video-shows-democratic-activist-bragging-about-dis/
https://nypost.com/2016/10/18/trump-rally-disrupter-was-once-on-clinton-campaigns-payroll/
This one has the video https://www.npr.org/2016/10/19/498587397/sting-video-purports-to-show-democrats-describing-how-to-commit-voter-fraud
Fact check: No proof of alleged voter fraud scheme or connection to Rep. Ilhan Omar
USA TODAY
Footage raises more questions than it answers, some taken out of context
Unknowns in the Project Veritas footage include the accuracy of the translations between Somali and English, the questions asked and the way the clips were edited.
Most of the sources are anonymous, and their faces are blurred or left out of the camera frame.
On Sept. 29, researchers at Stanford University and the University of Washington concluded that the video’s rollout suggests it was part of a “coordinated disinformation campaign,” they write at the Election Integrity Project site.
“It’s a great example of what a coordinated disinformation campaign looks like: pre-seeding the ground and then simultaneously hitting from a bunch of different accounts at once,” Alex Stamos, a researcher at the Stanford Internet Observatory, told the New York Times.
Our rating: FalseBased on our research, the claim that Project Veritas discovered a voter fraud scheme connected to Rep. Ilhan Omar is FALSE. There are many aspects that are impossible to corroborate, given the use of unnamed sources and unverifiable translations, and the "central source" behind the video backtracked on some of his claims after publication. There's no link between Omar and the alleged fraud, and the scenario in the video is implausible based on the evidence provided. Researchers have also termed the videos part of a "coordinated disinformation campaign."
Our fact-check sources:
· Donald J. Trump, Sept. 29, Tweet
· Statement from Jered Ede, Chief Legal Officer for Project Veritas
· Sahan Journal, Oct. 1, Omar Jamal, key source of Project Veritas election fraud video, backtracks on cash-for-ballots allegation.
· Donald Trump Jr, Sept. 28, Tweet
· Sahan Journal, Sept. 28, How did an August primary election in Minneapolis turn into a national right-wing disinformation campaign against absentee ballots?
· MPR News, April 24, 2009, When Somalis are in the news, so is Omar Jamal
· Snopes, Sept. 29, Viral Video Spreads Unfounded Claim About Rep. Ilhan Omar and Voter Fraud
· Minneapolis StarTribune, Sept. 29, Trump seizes on conservative group's claim of fraud in Minneapolis election
· USA TODAY, Aug. 12, Rep. Ilhan Omar wins contentious Democratic primary election in Minnesota
· Election Integrity Project, Sept. 29, Project Veritas #BallotHarvesting Amplification
· Jamal Osman-Minneapolis City Council Ward 6, Sept. 28, Post
· New York Times, Sept. 29, Researchers say a Project Veritas video accusing Ilhan Omar of voter fraud was a ‘coordinated disinformation campaign.’
· The Hill, May 26, 2010, ACORN filmmaker James O’Keefe sentenced in Sen. Mary Landrieu break-in
· Mother Jones, Oct. 20, 2014, Colorado Dems: We Caught James O’Keefe and His Friends Trying to Bait Us Into Approving Voter Fraud
· Washington Post, Nov. 27, 2017, A woman approached The Post with dramatic — and false — tale about Roy Moore. She appears to be part of undercover sting operation.
· National Conference of State Legislatures, Aug. 28, Who Can Collect and Return an Absentee Ballot Other Than the Voter
· Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, Primary Election
-
8 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
Leslie your mo is now to compulsively post character assassination without addressing the information in the previous post while posting information with nothing to do with the previous post. The news links say that the people in the videos were fired for what they said in the videos one of the links has the video.. So if you would like to address the links feel free to do so, if not you are basically harassing me like you did Robert Montenegro.
Here's Robert's post about you so that you and others can see that you are known for this kind of bad behavior:
"I should explain why, as a courtesy, why I deleted all of my posts on this forum and why I am back now.
After I started posting about the late Hank Albarelli's work into the "Stay-behind" elements involved with the murder of President Kennedy, forum member Anthony Thorne placed Ms. Leslie Sharp, a person who was working with my late friend H.P. “Hank” Albarelli Jr. on his book "Coup in Dallas: Who Killed JFK and Why".
She then started probing me for information.
Specifically, what I knew about Hank Albarelli's research, how and when I met Hank and what I knew about this other unfinished book projects.
I told her that I first contacted Mr. Albarelli because I needed help with a whistleblowers claim I was making against the Veterans Affairs Administration in regards to a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder stressor statement about certain Joint Special Operations Command personnel involved in war crimes I witnessed committed under the NATO International Security Assistance Forces operational structure while I was deployed to Afghanistan.
Incidentally, when I asked Ms. Leslie Sharp about the release date time-tables surrounding Hank's ten books before he passed away, with the following working titles:
1. "Coup in Dallas: Who Killed JFK and Why"
2. "Wormwood Exposed: The Truth About Frank Olson and Other Terrible Mistakes"
3. "CIA Femme Fatale: The Secret Life of June Cobb"
4. "An Unauthorized History of CIA Projects QJ/WIN and ZR/RIFLE"
5. "Lee Harvey Oswald and New York City, June 1962: A Complete Investigation and Substantial Questions and Issues"
6. "Project ARTICHOKE and the CIA's Development of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques"
7. "Exploiting Evil: Project PAPERCLIP, the Pentagon, CIA, and Human Experimentation"
8. "The Secret History of LSD and the CIA"
9. "Operation Midnight Climax: The Life and Time of George Hunter White, Federal Narcotics and CIA Agent Extraordinaire"
10. "Lee Harvey Oswald and The Manchurian Candidate, 1959-1963"
"I was told, under no uncertain terms, that she signed some "...oath of confidentiality..." gag-waiver with the publishers of Hank's work and I could not be given an answer about any element of Hank's research. Ms. Sharp then said, quite bluntly, that she did not believe I was in contact with Hank, because I did not sign such a oath.
Then Ms. Leslie Sharp started saying, for the sake of saving face on my account, I should delete all of my posts about the "Stay-behind" elements, because what Hank Albarelli told me in private conversation was not pertinent to the conclusions he came to in the final product of his book (which I highly doubt, in retrospect).
Then Ms. Leslie Sharp aggressively pushed me to delete my posts in order to "protect the memory of Hank" (pulling on my damn heart-strings).
Then, after I said I would, under no circumstances, not delete my posts, I was viciously threatened by Ms. Leslie Sharp that she would hit me with a "cease and desist" lawsuit by Simon & Schuster if I said or wrote anything more, ad infinitum, about the conversations that I had Hank Albarelli about his research into the JFK murder or anything about his unreleased books.
I am only coming forward now, because I have sought legal counsel of my own on the matter and am now aware of my legal rights, such as they are.
I did nothing illegal by relaying the content of private conversations, and I now consider what Ms, Leslie Sharp did a form of electronic harassment.
Does anyone know how to I can recover and put back the posts I deleted?
I will start reconstruction of the posts I made, in a few days, if no one can help me recover the data."
As long as you invoke Project Veritas, or Posobiec, I'll be right behind you to provide antidote for your disinformation.
And, as stated on another thread,I feel no need to "explain" 'this.'
And I suggest you refrain from slurs hurled at a combat veteran who acknowledges openly that he suffers PTSD. He's unable to take you on here, and you know it, but I will on his behalf.The moderators need to stay on top of your attempted psychological intimidation, and your misogynist rants, imho.
-
4 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
@Leslie Sharp care to explain this?
I feel no need to "explain" 'this.'
And I suggest you refrain from slurs hurled at a combat veteran who acknowledges openly that he suffers PTSD. He's unable to take you on here, and you know it, but I will on his behalf.The moderators need to stay on top of your attempted psychological intimidation, and your misogynist rants, imho.
-
On 3/11/2023 at 9:42 AM, Matthew Koch said:
During the 2016 election cycle Democratic Operatives were caught paying people to stir up trouble at Trump rallies so that the media could make stories about MAGA supporters being violent racists.. That is where the Trump is a fascist narrative started. I tried finding the video on Youtube but YouTube for an obvious reason mixes Project veritas's videos up and so I can't find it by going back, the left censorship on search engines is getting out of control and is starting to look like 1984
https://apnews.com/article/670714b83d3d437ab5e22d5a1ae7db4a
https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2016/oct/19/video-shows-democratic-activist-bragging-about-dis/
https://nypost.com/2016/10/18/trump-rally-disrupter-was-once-on-clinton-campaigns-payroll/
This one has the video https://www.npr.org/2016/10/19/498587397/sting-video-purports-to-show-democrats-describing-how-to-commit-voter-fraud
Not wishing to hijack the central issue Paul raises here, but it should be noted Project Veritas’ claims never hold up under credible scrutiny.
‘ . . . The firm and Creamer said Project Veritas used "heavily edited" footage in videos that falsely suggested they conspired to incite violence at then-Republican candidate Donald Trump's rallies and schemed to promote voter fraud.’
Project Veritas loses jury verdict to Democratic consulting firm
By Jonathan Stempel
Sept 23 (Reuters) - A federal jury has found Project Veritas, a conservative group often accused of using deceptive tactics, liable for violating wiretapping laws and misrepresenting itself in an undercover effort to target Democratic political consultants.
. . . Democracy Partners claimed it had been infiltrated by a Project Veritas operative who lied about her name and background to obtain an internship during the 2016 presidential campaign, and secretly recorded conversations while working there. -
2 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:22 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
I’ll let you know when you do, buttercup. 🙂
Provocateur.
-
3 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
This is exactly what I said to @Matthew Koch yesterday. By Kirk’s distorted rationale, not only Nietzsche could be included, but, Daniel Defoe (Robinson Crusoe), Shakespeare, Goethe and a whole host of others who the German leader read. Kirk’s emotions are running very high, I forgive him for the foggy, conflicted thinking.
the German leader
Interesting 'couching' of another mad man, Chris. -
17 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
I’ll let you know when you do, buttercup. 🙂
-
3 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
At your request, I have sat through this video which I think I previously watched.
I’ve been in situations while leaving football (soccer) stadiums that were worse than this. It’s exactly what I originally thought, a protest gone wrong and exploited. Its not a great advert for Americans.
What’s super interesting is that claim to have some previous experience representing the HL Hunt family in a PR capacity. Yet, it doesn’t occur to you that with 44 hours of footage, that a skilled PR person and an editor could tell any number of stories with that much footage. I certainly could.
Just to stoke your imagination:
Shouldn’t all of the footage be in the public domain?Should we have a proper explanation as why why Mr Buffalo Horns is being assisted by the cops?
You may not know this, Leslie, but, peoples ability to think critically is severely impaired when subjected to waves of fear. It was clear to me that there was a ‘fear psychosis’ brought on by the use of propaganda. Whether we look at the persecution of witches or 9/11, it’s very easy to manipulate people who are afraid. Joost Meerloo, the Dutch psychologist writes a great book about this process called; “The rape of the mind.”
I just see it as Plato’s allegory of the cave.
I am sorry to say it but, you guys are like kids at a magic show.
And with the utmost candor, Chris, I think what you're positing is batshit crazy. An experimental psychotherapist in Dublin played this game with her clientele, her "customers" as it were -- and ended up being sued after two of her customers committed suicide. She promoted perception is reality kind of madness that those young damaged psyches couldn't process. I was old enough to recognize the psychological sadism.
Most of us saw in that video a platform erected with a noose and heard "hang Mike Pence", and you SAY you saw a goal post and heard Ooh Ahh Paul McGrah?? Dishonesty in addition to mind games is crass and a reflection of a damaged personality.
So, what you're suggesting here is utterly insane, and I suspect you know it and achieve some strange pleasure mindf-cking those who've only just met you. Like I said, your card is marked in my books. You are a provocateur in the mold of Roger Stone. I revisited Ed Forum recently to see if it had been corrupted similar to a number of Facebook forums. Sadly this thread confirm that's the case.
-
The assassination in Dallas was an attack on the Presidency ergo an attack on our democracy. Trump's refusal to accept the election results was also an attack on the Presidency, a mirror of Dallas 1963.
-
18 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:
LS-
I have little ability to control the narrative of anything.
I would say, in this little teeny-weeny corner of the internet (readership in the dozens), I am airing out or bringing a little sunlight to the official and dubious narrative of 1/6.
I do not pretend to have the whole story, but I am justifiably skeptical of the official-MSM narratives of that day.
On top of that, I think the 1/6 "insurrection" had about as much chance of succeeding as a spit-wad has of sinking a battleship.
A lot of hyperbole and fear-mongering has been going on.
But I encourage you to seek your perspective of matters.
Jan 6 was not meant to "succeed", in the fashion you seem to suggest. The assault on the Capitol was meant to disrupt, and to prove that 'they' could continue to disrupt. I think your particular blancmange attitude in even this small pond has ripple effects. You may be under the impression that few read these threads, but I have reason to beg to differ. Encouraging an impressionable lad like Matthew Koch to promote Posobiec's propaganda is a reflection on you whether you welcome it or not.
Do you understand that the murder of Kennedy, the man, was a criminal act, but the assassination in Dallas was an attack on the Presidency ergo an attack on our democracy. Trump's refusal to accept the election results was also an attack on the presidency, (perhaps the final before an authoritarian dictator takes control), and a mirror of Dallas 1963.I too hope that you will inform yourself daily.
-
15 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
That ‘woman scorned’ comment turned out to he pretty accurate, eh Leslie?!
I'm flattered to be the woman who ruffles your feathers, Chris.
Let me reiterate, as obscure philosophizing seems to be your forte. . . .. . . "The alt-right became a political force, trolling America with obscure philosophizing, pro-Trump messages, and outright racism, while Richard Spencer gave Regnery’s movement of aging white nationalists a clean-shaven, camera-ready face. Since Trump’s win, the movement has only gained prominence.” . . . — Aron Roston, Joel Anderson.
-
38 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:
Stray thought:
In this forum, sometimes alt-r or alt-l groups are mentioned as threats or dangers.
But I suspect it works the other way around.
The centrists in both parties (aka the purple party) are most aligned with the status quo, have the Wall Street-Silicon Valley-defense money behind them, and will brook no competing narratives, and engage in endless foreign wars on behalf of multinationals and globalists.
As I say, who can tell the difference between Liz Cheney and Hillary Clinton?
Was it the alt-r that lied about the Wuhan lab leak?
Was it the alt-l that lied about the JFKA?
That doesn't mean everyone in the alt crowd is omniscient or saintly.
But who can control the narrative, and marshal thousands of useful idiots?
The precursor to the alt-right drove the decision to remove Kennedy permanently. So, I think your observation is moot.
You and yours here are attempting to control a narrative of January 6 that is anathema to the truth. Wisner must be smiling down on you and yours with a "well done Boys!". . . "The alt-right became a political force, trolling America with obscure philosophizing, pro-Trump messages, and outright racism, while Richard Spencer gave Regnery’s movement of aging white nationalists a clean-shaven, camera-ready face. Since Trump’s win, the movement has only gained prominence.” . . . — Aron Roston, Joel Anderson.
From Coup in Dallas . . . Membership in the America First Committee grew quickly, attracting around 800,000 Americans, due in part to the wealth of the founders who could subsidize the slick promotion for the movement, a phenomenon perfected over ensuing decades. Described by its detractors as an isolationist pressure group whose original leaders included anti-Semitic and pro-fascists, the AFC capitalized on the believability of famed aviator and National Socialist apologist Charles Lindbergh to assuage skepticism and concern. Just weeks before the US entered WWII, at a rousing speech in Des Moines, Iowa, home of Cowles media company and The Des Moines Register, the famed aviator was joined by textile industrialist William Henry Regnery. One of the organizing members of the AFC, Regnery’s parents had emigrated from Germany. His son Henry would later found one of the foremost Holocaust Denial and anti-Semitic publishing houses in the US following the war. Other prominent leaders of the original AFC included the Rev. Gerald L. K. Smith who was perhaps the most prominent fascist clerical of the 20th century, and of course, Gen. Wood, Chairman of Sears Roebuck and future founder of the American Security Council comprised of corporatists, some of whose international investments had been adversely impacted by President Roosevelt’s stated policy against the rise of Hitler’s N azism.. . .
It was Bill Regnery who philosophically and financially mentored what became known in the mid-2000s as the “alt-right.” Avowed Neo-National Socialist Richard Spencer served as his spokesman. While at Duke University, Spencer had brushed against a future advisor to the 45th president, Stephen Miller, who would later serve as aid to Senator and future Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Together, the two archconservatives formulated the idea of “nation-state populism”, an economic nationalist movement modeled on the populism of Andrew Jackson, the senator from Tennessee before becoming the seventh president of the United States whose harsh policies toward enslaved people and Native Americans are a blight on America’s past. Nation-state populism would greatly influence the Trump anti-immigration campaign.Ten years earlier, in 2005, Bill Regnery had formed the National Policy Institute. The first NPI chairman, Louis R. Andrews explained that in the 2008 election, he had voted for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama because, “I want to see the Republican Party destroyed so it can be reborn as a party representing the interests of white people, not entrenched corporate elites.” In a July 2017 piece titled, “The Moneyman Behind the Alt-Right,” BuzzFeed reporters Aram Roston and Joel Anderson noted, “Suddenly, the seed money Regnery had doled out—often in small grants under $25,000—started to show returns. The alt-right became a political force, trolling America with obscure philosophizing, pro-Trump messages, and outright racism, while Richard Spencer gave Regnery’s movement of aging white nationalists a clean-shaven, camera-ready face. Since Trump’s win, the movement has only gained prominence.”
***
When Donald Trump was elected president, a number of leaders from the alt-right movement assumed important advisory positions, including those responsible for creating a platform for the “alt-right,” the online publication Breitbart News. In a piece titled, “An Establishment Conservatives’ Guide to the Alt-Right” published in 2016, the Italian philosopher and occultist Julius Evola is touted as “one of the thinkers in whose writings the origins of the alternative right can be found.” Evola, identified earlier in this book, was the intellectual and spiritual inspiration of leading Italian fascists, including “The Black Prince” Julius Borghese and Stefano delle Chiaie who were inclined toward murder and blackmail as political solutions. As noted, Evola was also an early admirer of American fascist Francis Parker Yockey whose fervent adherent, H. Keith Thompson, would serve a similar role as that of Isaac Don Levine when he became a publicist for Marguerite Oswald. Yockey’s writings were advanced almost exclusively by American propagandist Willis Carto, philosophically aligned in 1963 with Rev. Gerald L K. Smith, a cofounder of the America First Committee. Carto would leave as his final legacy, the American Free Press where Patrick Buchanan found a well-primed audience.
-
27 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:
Well, @Matthew Koch, congrats to you and others, you’ve managed to make a swathe of members behave as petulant children. Did you know before hand that it was going to be this easy to whip them into a fever of negative emotions?
🙂
Petulant children, Chris? Do tell, oh wise one, how you manage to keep a straight face as you project your pathology onto others.
Perhaps you might tee up a month in the woods with Matthew? Build another tree house maybe, "no girls allowed" of course.Would that Robert Bly was still around, god rest his soul, to help you thru this crisis of gender identification you both seem to be struggling with.
Now, can you tell me who you think plotted to assassinate Kennedy in Dallas? and why you're interested in the inevitable result of the past [60] years ? Can you share how the assassination impacted, for instance, life in Britain, or maybe Ireland?
-
49 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
uh.. no, I read his posts because I thought it was weird that he deleted his profile and came back. Then I found him harassing members on the forum for being of the center right of the political spectrum to the point that he got put on one post a day for calling other members fascist similar to what you are compulsively doing.. I just now scrolled through all of what he wrote and guess what I found? You (Leslie Sharp) mentioned, what a crazy coincidence pardon the pun!
Here's what he wrote about you:
"I should explain why, as a courtesy, why I deleted all of my posts on this forum and why I am back now.
After I started posting about the late Hank Albarelli's work into the "Stay-behind" elements involved with the murder of President Kennedy, forum member Anthony Thorne placed Ms. Leslie Sharp, a person who was working with my late friend H.P. “Hank” Albarelli Jr. on his book "Coup in Dallas: Who Killed JFK and Why".
She then started probing me for information.
Specifically, what I knew about Hank Albarelli's research, how and when I met Hank and what I knew about this other unfinished book projects.
I told her that I first contacted Mr. Albarelli because I needed help with a whistleblowers claim I was making against the Veterans Affairs Administration in regards to a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder stressor statement about certain Joint Special Operations Command personnel involved in war crimes I witnessed committed under the NATO International Security Assistance Forces operational structure while I was deployed to Afghanistan.
Incidentally, when I asked Ms. Leslie Sharp about the release date time-tables surrounding Hank's ten books before he passed away, with the following working titles:
1. "Coup in Dallas: Who Killed JFK and Why"
2. "Wormwood Exposed: The Truth About Frank Olson and Other Terrible Mistakes"
3. "CIA Femme Fatale: The Secret Life of June Cobb"
4. "An Unauthorized History of CIA Projects QJ/WIN and ZR/RIFLE"
5. "Lee Harvey Oswald and New York City, June 1962: A Complete Investigation and Substantial Questions and Issues"
6. "Project ARTICHOKE and the CIA's Development of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques"
7. "Exploiting Evil: Project PAPERCLIP, the Pentagon, CIA, and Human Experimentation"
8. "The Secret History of LSD and the CIA"
9. "Operation Midnight Climax: The Life and Time of George Hunter White, Federal Narcotics and CIA Agent Extraordinaire"
10. "Lee Harvey Oswald and The Manchurian Candidate, 1959-1963"
"I was told, under no uncertain terms, that she signed some "...oath of confidentiality..." gag-waiver with the publishers of Hank's work and I could not be given an answer about any element of Hank's research. Ms. Sharp then said, quite bluntly, that she did not believe I was in contact with Hank, because I did not sign such a oath.
Then Ms. Leslie Sharp started saying, for the sake of saving face on my account, I should delete all of my posts about the "Stay-behind" elements, because what Hank Albarelli told me in private conversation was not pertinent to the conclusions he came to in the final product of his book (which I highly doubt, in retrospect).
Then Ms. Leslie Sharp aggressively pushed me to delete my posts in order to "protect the memory of Hank" (pulling on my damn heart-strings).
Then, after I said I would, under no circumstances, not delete my posts, I was viciously threatened by Ms. Leslie Sharp that she would hit me with a "cease and desist" lawsuit by Simon & Schuster if I said or wrote anything more, ad infinitum, about the conversations that I had Hank Albarelli about his research into the JFK murder or anything about his unreleased books.
I am only coming forward now, because I have sought legal counsel of my own on the matter and am now aware of my legal rights, such as they are.
I did nothing illegal by relaying the content of private conversations, and I now consider what Ms, Leslie Sharp did a form of electronic harassment.
Does anyone know how to I can recover and put back the posts I deleted?
I will start reconstruction of the posts I made, in a few days, if no one can help me recover the data."
If this is exemplary of your research skills, I understand why you have yet to offer substantive facts relevant to the inevitable end result of the past [60] years. You clearly know nothing of consequence about the plot to assassinate Kennedy in Dallas. I suspect you've never done your own digging, but left it to others.
And, you know nothing of the dynamics in play during the months following Hank's passing. I wouldn't sully his memory or his interactions with those he mentored, including Monty, by elaborating here. It's really none of your business.
Robert Montenegro's deep research overwhelmed you, and it's a shame he was banned from this forum while you are left to run amok. -
14 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:
I will keep my eye out.
In the current environment, threats to freedoms might come from either or both parties. And possibly even most from the "centrists" in both parties.
I was wondering about Thiel abruptly withdrawing all of his cash from SVB. Financial? or Political? Or both?
How better to try and topple Democracy in America than another 2008?
Curtis Yarvin wants American democracy toppled. He has some prominent Republican fans.
The New Right blogger has been cited by Blake Masters and J.D. Vance. What exactly is he advocating?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug -
17 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:
hmmmm. Did you meet Robert here ... on Ed Forum?
-
20 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
Sorry reality isn't a good enough answer for you💯
You are a female version of Robert Montenegro, he clearly has mental problems and so do you.
hmmmm. Did you meet Robert here ... on Ed Forum?
And did you follow the massacre referred to in my response? Why are you avoiding discussion of that horrendous tragedy perpetrated by a psychopath who was familiar with the symbolism Roger jokingly flashes> -
1 minute ago, Benjamin Cole said:
Yarvin is obviously a smart guy, but not my cup of tea. I prefer democracy, transparency, warts and all.
I have to say, the Donk alliance with the Deep State and allied M$M is probably 1000 times times as powerful as Yarvin.
Yarvin strikes me as a bonsai tree in a redwood forest.
I asked because Yarvin apparently caught Thiel's attention, either before or after Bannon's. If you've been following the posts about James Angleton's admiration of The Black Prince Borghese who was heavily influenced by Julius Evola, this is an interesting read — in context.
Rose notes that the intellectual luminaries for many of today’s younger conservatives are no longer those that inspired the turn against social democracy in the late 70s: ‘Instead of William Buckley it is Curtis Yarvin. Instead of Milton Friedman it is Peter Thiel. Instead of George Will it is Angelo Codevilla. Instead of Richard John Neuhaus it is Adrian Vermeule. Instead of Irving Kristol it is Steve Sailor. … In congressional offices, Republican politicians won’t know them all either, but their young aides will. At conservative magazines, senior editors don’t read them, but their junior staff do.’
https://justinleighreynolds.medium.com/a-world-after-liberalism-the-radical-right-and-the-dream-of-tradition-a5310026e27d -
8 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:
The fact that you are reposting your posts that have already been replied to and ignoring the reply, basically points to the fact that you have a psychotic disorder, seek help💯 Please!!
When you offer a semi-literate response to Stone''s finger symbol — not the joke you culled from the MAGA threads you rely on, but a serious analysis of why he's photographed with a crowd of militants flashing the ok symbol, one of whom is also comfortable saluting "the" fuhrer —we can move on.
Speaking of psychopaths, do you remember that massacre? What did you think about as it was being reported? Birdwatching? -
36 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:
What was debunked, Matthew m'dear?
Stone et al. were aware of the provocation of the hand symbol, as noted by social science observers of such phenomenon. You're protective of Stone and Posobiec for your own reasons which Freud might suggest are father related. Jung would be gentler, but then Joseph Campbell would be far more entertaining. And, come to think of it, a few months in the woods with Blye might do you a world of good.You do remember 51 people were killed at mosques in New Zealand, right Matthew? Roger Stone knows exactly what he's doing with the finger symbol, and it isn't to upset the Dems. He's one evil bastard.
At some point, life begins to imitate their art, and what began as a media hoax takes on dangerously radical connotations. This point came when the Australian man charged with killing 51 people at mosques in New Zealand, made the OK gesture during a courtroom appearance after being arrested.
Allen
in JFK Assassination Debate
Posted
If the moderators insist, I will but not before I argue that you now have the facts that (at least on occasion) Project Veritas publishes disinformation as borne out in the courts, so, I believe it's incumbent upon you to remove those related Project Veritas links, otherwise yes, you are knowingly posting false information.