Gil Jesus Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Mark Lane reveals yet another deficiency in the Warren Commission's "investigation". Burt Griffin, the WC lawyer responsible for research into Jack Ruby, didn't even know that Ruby testified to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee as an informant for Richard Nixon in 1947. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDOszGJeaPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myra Bronstein Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Mark Lane reveals yet another deficiency in the Warren Commission's "investigation". Burt Griffin, the WC lawyer responsible for research into Jack Ruby, didn't even know that Ruby testified to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee as an informant for Richard Nixon in 1947. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDOszGJeaPU Forgot all about that connection Gil. Thanks... Fewer than six degrees of separation with this gang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Burt Griffin, the WC lawyer responsible for research into Jack Ruby, didn't even know that Ruby testified to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee as an informant for Richard Nixon in 1947. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDOszGJeaPU Burt Griffin may not have known this little tit-bit about Ruby's background, but what's the betting that those who selected Ruby as hit man DID know about it, and figured that somebody like Mark Lane would pick up on it sooner or later, launching yet another wild goose chase? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Thomas Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Gil, Mark Lane reveals yet another deficiency in the Warren Commission's "investigation". Burt Griffin, the WC lawyer responsible for research into Jack Ruby, didn't even know that Ruby testified to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee as an informant for Richard Nixon in 1947. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDOszGJeaPU Didn't Nixon, or someone associated with him write the Chairman of this Committee asking that Ruby be excused from testifying because he was an informant for Richard Nixon? Steve Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Buell Posted June 8, 2007 Share Posted June 8, 2007 Gil,Mark Lane reveals yet another deficiency in the Warren Commission's "investigation". Burt Griffin, the WC lawyer responsible for research into Jack Ruby, didn't even know that Ruby testified to the House UnAmerican Activities Committee as an informant for Richard Nixon in 1947. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDOszGJeaPU Didn't Nixon, or someone associated with him write the Chairman of this Committee asking that Ruby be excused from testifying because he was an informant for Richard Nixon? Steve Thomas There is a document to that effect, the authenticity of which has been challenged by some. For more on this see: http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/2006/12/...t-document.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 (edited) Hi Gary: Here is a document that may be of some use to you, in your research.....? B Edited June 9, 2007 by Bernice Moore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now