Jump to content

Yes David! There is a Santa Claus


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Z357

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7198/z357...modifiedyk7.png

Now!

Those who are familiar with recurring/repetatively occurring artifacts on film which have been imparted as a result of either the camera or the projector (when projecting for duplication), are usually familiar with the virtual impossibility for such an artifact to remain in the ABSOLUTE EXACT same location on two separate frames of the film, when the camera is being hand-held and "panned" to follow a moving car.

The artifact location in relationship to the right shoulder of James Altgens is, for all practical purposes, a complete impossibility to achieve in natural filming sequence.

And, based on the number of exposures in which this image appears on the shoulder of Altgens, correlated with the actual movement seen by the Presidential Limo against the background items, this exact alignment of the artifact could not have occurred as a result of the conversion of the film to DVD/video

So David, there is one of the X-mas presents, and be assured that there are in fact more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z357

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7198/z357...modifiedyk7.png

Now!

Those who are familiar with recurring/repetatively occurring artifacts on film which have been imparted as a result of either the camera or the projector (when projecting for duplication), are usually familiar with the virtual impossibility for such an artifact to remain in the ABSOLUTE EXACT same location on two separate frames of the film, when the camera is being hand-held and "panned" to follow a moving car.

The artifact location in relationship to the right shoulder of James Altgens is, for all practical purposes, a complete impossibility to achieve in natural filming sequence.

And, based on the number of exposures in which this image appears on the shoulder of Altgens, correlated with the actual movement seen by the Presidential Limo against the background items, this exact alignment of the artifact could not have occurred as a result of the conversion of the film to DVD/video

So David, there is one of the X-mas presents, and be assured that there are in fact more.

Tom,

From Zavada's research:

Claw Shadow

One of the image anomalies seen is a darker (higher density) band or wide bar in the image area between the perforations. This anomaly can be noted in the Zapruder frames as well as my practical test, photos. This higher density (band or streak) can be explained as being caused by the shadow of the intermittent claw (and its supporting arm) as it moves upward over the film to engage the following perforation and pull down the next frame. The pull-down is with the shutter closed, but the upward movement of the claw out of the perforation, over the area between the perforations, into the next perforation hole is done while the shutter is open and the film is being exposed. The claw movement over the area between the perforations reduces the amount of light reaching the film causing more density. (Less light is more density on a reversal film.) The reduction in exposure to the area behind the claw is not linear. The claw functions with a shutter crank pin engaging the claw slot giving a sinusoidal time relationship to the pulldown ratchet reentry action.

Claw or Aperture Flare:

Claw flare appears to be a very real image anomaly often, but not always, seen adjacent to the dark bar caused by the claw shadow and the normal image area. In addition, when the 8mm image is viewed normal, the bottom of the upper perforation may show some flare-like density difference. It is this perforation that "sees" the bottom of the claw arm as it enters the perforation hole and pauses before beginning its rapid positioning stroke.

What do you think?

chris

Edited by Chris Davidson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z357

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7198/z357...modifiedyk7.png

Now!

Those who are familiar with recurring/repetatively occurring artifacts on film which have been imparted as a result of either the camera or the projector (when projecting for duplication), are usually familiar with the virtual impossibility for such an artifact to remain in the ABSOLUTE EXACT same location on two separate frames of the film, when the camera is being hand-held and "panned" to follow a moving car.

The artifact location in relationship to the right shoulder of James Altgens is, for all practical purposes, a complete impossibility to achieve in natural filming sequence.

And, based on the number of exposures in which this image appears on the shoulder of Altgens, correlated with the actual movement seen by the Presidential Limo against the background items, this exact alignment of the artifact could not have occurred as a result of the conversion of the film to DVD/video

So David, there is one of the X-mas presents, and be assured that there are in fact more.

Tom,

From Zavada's research:

Claw Shadow

One of the image anomalies seen is a darker (higher density) band or wide bar in the image area between the perforations. This anomaly can be noted in the Zapruder frames as well as my practical test, photos. This higher density (band or streak) can be explained as being caused by the shadow of the intermittent claw (and its supporting arm) as it moves upward over the film to engage the following perforation and pull down the next frame. The pull-down is with the shutter closed, but the upward movement of the claw out of the perforation, over the area between the perforations, into the next perforation hole is done while the shutter is open and the film is being exposed. The claw movement over the area between the perforations reduces the amount of light reaching the film causing more density. (Less light is more density on a reversal film.) The reduction in exposure to the area behind the claw is not linear. The claw functions with a shutter crank pin engaging the claw slot giving a sinusoidal time relationship to the pulldown ratchet reentry action.

Claw or Aperture Flare:

Claw flare appears to be a very real image anomaly often, but not always, seen adjacent to the dark bar caused by the claw shadow and the normal image area. In addition, when the 8mm image is viewed normal, the bottom of the upper perforation may show some flare-like density difference. It is this perforation that "sees" the bottom of the claw arm as it enters the perforation hole and pauses before beginning its rapid positioning stroke.

What do you think?

chris

Chris;

I have read the report on the "Claw Shadow", and from it's reading it would appear that Zavada is reference the overall band/width area from sprocket hole to sprocket hole and from left edge of film to right edge of sprocket holes, of which the entire area has a darker density.

His explanation appears to state that as the claw was moving upwards over the film to come into sync with the next upper hole, that it prevented a given amount of light from entering, thus this area of exposure remains darker as an "area" than does the normal film.

The artifact is an "absolute" image of something!

There are, for all practical purposes, only three items of which I can think of which would create such a frequently clear image.

1. Contamination within the camera lense within a specific area in which the contamination image was transposed.*

2. Contamination within the projector which was utilized to project the film for duplication.**

3. Alteration.***

* The artifact image is clearly present in those first frames of the film which Zapruder ran off before the Presidential Limo came into view, and for the great amount of the film, this image is clearly present.

However, through that section which leads from the lamppost (Z278) until after the headshot at Z313, the image "fades" to oblivion.

This too can not be, provided that this is all the same film, and yet the image also disappears in those copies presented in the WC.

Yet, thereafter, the image clearly picks back up and continues it's relative clear, recurring, repetetive progression with the remainder of the film.

**Even were this a "projector image artifact", the image would not be present, then disappear to oblivion, and thereafter again pick back up with complete clarity.

***If one will note:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z207.jpg

The artifact image is clearly present directly above the windshield of the SS followup car.

Then:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z208.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z209.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z210.jpg

Need I remind everyone that Z208 through Z210 is that area where the WC altered the survey data and pulled their slight/sleight-of-hand.

Also:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z340.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z341.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z342.jpg

As well as:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z349.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z350.jpg

So, the artifact is too clearly defined to have merely disappeared prior to the headshot, and since it clearly provides an item for reference of progression, it's elimination at various points which have now been identified, certainly makes it's disappearance appear to be far more than some mere circumstance.

Another item, and I would have to look for the specific instance(s), the artifact is in fact clear at other times when the film area itself is blurred.

Thus providing additional support that it is either a camera induced/contamination artifact; a projector induced artifact; or an overlay artifact.

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z351.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z211.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to moving on into other areas, perhaps a slight refresher is due for those who truly have not followed the history of the lies and misrepresentations as regards the WC and the Zapruder film.

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol18_0017a.htm

As most true researchers are aware, the WC somewhat neglected to provide us with copies of Z208 through Z211.

This subject was brought out long ago by others, and, if recalled correctly, Mr. Thompson, in his book, was the first of record to provide copies of these missing frames of the film for general review.

As a side note, after the obviously negligent aspects of the WC's failure to provide copies of these frames of the film were brought out, it was widely reported that the WC did not receive these copies of the film from Time/Life.

Next, might I remind everyone that the Z208 to Z212 area is in fact the location at which the US Secret Service, as well as the FBI, in their survey/assassination re-enactments, determined that JFK had been fully struck by the first shot.

A further reminder would point out the fact that the Z208 & Z210 points, happen to be two of those positions at which the WC deemed it necessary to falsify and change the survey data as presented on CE 884.

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol17_0464b.htm

An additional "refresher" would also point out the fact that Z209/Z210/ & Z211 contain the inherent "blur/jiggle" which is comparative with the same type indicator beginning at Z318 through Z320, which is five Z-frames after impact of the Z313 headshot.

And lastly, one would be quite remiss were they not to also point out the "Adjusted Position" in which the WC really pulled a fast one as regards the position of JFK as compared to the aiming point utilized by the WC for Z-frames 208/210.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/frazr3.htm

Mr. Frazier-

"On Commission Exhibit No. 893, also marked frame 210, we have the photograph made at the adjusted position to accommodate the 10-inch difference in height between the stand-in and the actual position of the wound above the street and on the President's body"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edited by Thomas H. Purvis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prior to moving on into other areas, perhaps a slight refresher is due for those who truly have not followed the history of the lies and misrepresentations as regards the WC and the Zapruder film.

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol18_0017a.htm

As most true researchers are aware, the WC somewhat neglected to provide us with copies of Z208 through Z211.

This subject was brought out long ago by others, and, if recalled correctly, Mr. Thompson, in his book, was the first of record to provide copies of these missing frames of the film for general review.

As a side note, after the obviously negligent aspects of the WC's failure to provide copies of these frames of the film were brought out, it was widely reported that the WC did not receive these copies of the film from Time/Life.

Next, might I remind everyone that the Z208 to Z212 area is in fact the location at which the US Secret Service, as well as the FBI, in their survey/assassination re-enactments, determined that JFK had been fully struck by the first shot.

A further reminder would point out the fact that the Z208 & Z210 points, happen to be two of those positions at which the WC deemed it necessary to falsify and change the survey data as presented on CE 884.

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol17_0464b.htm

An additional "refresher" would also point out the fact that Z209/Z210/ & Z211 contain the inherent "blur/jiggle" which is comparative with the same type indicator beginning at Z318 through Z320, which is five Z-frames after impact of the Z313 headshot.

And lastly, one would be quite remiss were they not to also point out the "Adjusted Position" in which the WC really pulled a fast one as regards the position of JFK as compared to the aiming point utilized by the WC for Z-frames 208/210.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/frazr3.htm

Mr. Frazier-

"On Commission Exhibit No. 893, also marked frame 210, we have the photograph made at the adjusted position to accommodate the 10-inch difference in height between the stand-in and the actual position of the wound above the street and on the President's body"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/frazr3.htm

Mr. FRAZIER - On Commission Exhibit No. 892, also marked frame No. 207, the car was moved forward under the tree to the point where the spot on the Presidential stand-in's back just became visible beyond the foliage of the tree. I had the car stopped at that point so that this photograph could be made there.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can only speak for myself, but I certainly like to see exactly what it is that someone is speaking of!

And, at least we have some "sprocket holes" here.

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z207.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This forum keeps informing me that "You did not select a file to upload"!

Therefore:

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/571/wcz210modifiednw1.png

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z210.jpg

Of course, one can now find a copy of Z210 here.

And, Mr. Thompson's book also long ago provided us with the same copy.

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol18_0017a.htm

So! Even if the WC did not receive and print copies of frame Z210, we nevertheless still have copies, (without the sprocket holes I might add).

But, wait a minute!

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/frazr3.htm

Mr. FRAZIER - On Commission Exhibit No. 893, also marked frame 210, we have the photograph made at the adjusted position to accommodate the 10-inch difference in height between the stand-in and the actual position of the wound above the street and on the President's body.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/...Vol18_0052a.htm

For one, I never cease to be amazed at the capabilities of the WC.

Not only could they reproduce a "composite" of a Z-frame which they did not have, but they could also reproduce this non-existent frame of the film with portions of it's sprocket hole showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z357

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7198/z357...modifiedyk7.png

Now!

Those who are familiar with recurring/repetatively occurring artifacts on film which have been imparted as a result of either the camera or the projector (when projecting for duplication), are usually familiar with the virtual impossibility for such an artifact to remain in the ABSOLUTE EXACT same location on two separate frames of the film, when the camera is being hand-held and "panned" to follow a moving car.

The artifact location in relationship to the right shoulder of James Altgens is, for all practical purposes, a complete impossibility to achieve in natural filming sequence.

And, based on the number of exposures in which this image appears on the shoulder of Altgens, correlated with the actual movement seen by the Presidential Limo against the background items, this exact alignment of the artifact could not have occurred as a result of the conversion of the film to DVD/video

So David, there is one of the X-mas presents, and be assured that there are in fact more.

Tom,

From Zavada's research:

Claw Shadow

One of the image anomalies seen is a darker (higher density) band or wide bar in the image area between the perforations. This anomaly can be noted in the Zapruder frames as well as my practical test, photos. This higher density (band or streak) can be explained as being caused by the shadow of the intermittent claw (and its supporting arm) as it moves upward over the film to engage the following perforation and pull down the next frame. The pull-down is with the shutter closed, but the upward movement of the claw out of the perforation, over the area between the perforations, into the next perforation hole is done while the shutter is open and the film is being exposed. The claw movement over the area between the perforations reduces the amount of light reaching the film causing more density. (Less light is more density on a reversal film.) The reduction in exposure to the area behind the claw is not linear. The claw functions with a shutter crank pin engaging the claw slot giving a sinusoidal time relationship to the pulldown ratchet reentry action.

Claw or Aperture Flare:

Claw flare appears to be a very real image anomaly often, but not always, seen adjacent to the dark bar caused by the claw shadow and the normal image area. In addition, when the 8mm image is viewed normal, the bottom of the upper perforation may show some flare-like density difference. It is this perforation that "sees" the bottom of the claw arm as it enters the perforation hole and pauses before beginning its rapid positioning stroke.

What do you think?

chris

Chris;

I have read the report on the "Claw Shadow", and from it's reading it would appear that Zavada is reference the overall band/width area from sprocket hole to sprocket hole and from left edge of film to right edge of sprocket holes, of which the entire area has a darker density.

His explanation appears to state that as the claw was moving upwards over the film to come into sync with the next upper hole, that it prevented a given amount of light from entering, thus this area of exposure remains darker as an "area" than does the normal film.

The artifact is an "absolute" image of something!

There are, for all practical purposes, only three items of which I can think of which would create such a frequently clear image.

1. Contamination within the camera lense within a specific area in which the contamination image was transposed.*

2. Contamination within the projector which was utilized to project the film for duplication.**

3. Alteration.***

* The artifact image is clearly present in those first frames of the film which Zapruder ran off before the Presidential Limo came into view, and for the great amount of the film, this image is clearly present.

However, through that section which leads from the lamppost (Z278) until after the headshot at Z313, the image "fades" to oblivion.

This too can not be, provided that this is all the same film, and yet the image also disappears in those copies presented in the WC.

Yet, thereafter, the image clearly picks back up and continues it's relative clear, recurring, repetetive progression with the remainder of the film.

**Even were this a "projector image artifact", the image would not be present, then disappear to oblivion, and thereafter again pick back up with complete clarity.

***If one will note:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z207.jpg

The artifact image is clearly present directly above the windshield of the SS followup car.

Then:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z208.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z209.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z210.jpg

Need I remind everyone that Z208 through Z210 is that area where the WC altered the survey data and pulled their slight/sleight-of-hand.

Also:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z340.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z341.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z342.jpg

As well as:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z349.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z350.jpg

So, the artifact is too clearly defined to have merely disappeared prior to the headshot, and since it clearly provides an item for reference of progression, it's elimination at various points which have now been identified, certainly makes it's disappearance appear to be far more than some mere circumstance.

Another item, and I would have to look for the specific instance(s), the artifact is in fact clear at other times when the film area itself is blurred.

Thus providing additional support that it is either a camera induced/contamination artifact; a projector induced artifact; or an overlay artifact.

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z351.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z211.jpg

The artifact would appear to change sizes between frames.

Frames 195/196.

If it's a physical part of the camera, wouldn't the size/shape of the artifact stay consistant?

chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z357

http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/7198/z357...modifiedyk7.png

Now!

Those who are familiar with recurring/repetatively occurring artifacts on film which have been imparted as a result of either the camera or the projector (when projecting for duplication), are usually familiar with the virtual impossibility for such an artifact to remain in the ABSOLUTE EXACT same location on two separate frames of the film, when the camera is being hand-held and "panned" to follow a moving car.

The artifact location in relationship to the right shoulder of James Altgens is, for all practical purposes, a complete impossibility to achieve in natural filming sequence.

And, based on the number of exposures in which this image appears on the shoulder of Altgens, correlated with the actual movement seen by the Presidential Limo against the background items, this exact alignment of the artifact could not have occurred as a result of the conversion of the film to DVD/video

So David, there is one of the X-mas presents, and be assured that there are in fact more.

Tom,

From Zavada's research:

Claw Shadow

One of the image anomalies seen is a darker (higher density) band or wide bar in the image area between the perforations. This anomaly can be noted in the Zapruder frames as well as my practical test, photos. This higher density (band or streak) can be explained as being caused by the shadow of the intermittent claw (and its supporting arm) as it moves upward over the film to engage the following perforation and pull down the next frame. The pull-down is with the shutter closed, but the upward movement of the claw out of the perforation, over the area between the perforations, into the next perforation hole is done while the shutter is open and the film is being exposed. The claw movement over the area between the perforations reduces the amount of light reaching the film causing more density. (Less light is more density on a reversal film.) The reduction in exposure to the area behind the claw is not linear. The claw functions with a shutter crank pin engaging the claw slot giving a sinusoidal time relationship to the pulldown ratchet reentry action.

Claw or Aperture Flare:

Claw flare appears to be a very real image anomaly often, but not always, seen adjacent to the dark bar caused by the claw shadow and the normal image area. In addition, when the 8mm image is viewed normal, the bottom of the upper perforation may show some flare-like density difference. It is this perforation that "sees" the bottom of the claw arm as it enters the perforation hole and pauses before beginning its rapid positioning stroke.

What do you think?

chris

Chris;

I have read the report on the "Claw Shadow", and from it's reading it would appear that Zavada is reference the overall band/width area from sprocket hole to sprocket hole and from left edge of film to right edge of sprocket holes, of which the entire area has a darker density.

His explanation appears to state that as the claw was moving upwards over the film to come into sync with the next upper hole, that it prevented a given amount of light from entering, thus this area of exposure remains darker as an "area" than does the normal film.

The artifact is an "absolute" image of something!

There are, for all practical purposes, only three items of which I can think of which would create such a frequently clear image.

1. Contamination within the camera lense within a specific area in which the contamination image was transposed.*

2. Contamination within the projector which was utilized to project the film for duplication.**

3. Alteration.***

* The artifact image is clearly present in those first frames of the film which Zapruder ran off before the Presidential Limo came into view, and for the great amount of the film, this image is clearly present.

However, through that section which leads from the lamppost (Z278) until after the headshot at Z313, the image "fades" to oblivion.

This too can not be, provided that this is all the same film, and yet the image also disappears in those copies presented in the WC.

Yet, thereafter, the image clearly picks back up and continues it's relative clear, recurring, repetetive progression with the remainder of the film.

**Even were this a "projector image artifact", the image would not be present, then disappear to oblivion, and thereafter again pick back up with complete clarity.

***If one will note:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z207.jpg

The artifact image is clearly present directly above the windshield of the SS followup car.

Then:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z208.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z209.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z210.jpg

Need I remind everyone that Z208 through Z210 is that area where the WC altered the survey data and pulled their slight/sleight-of-hand.

Also:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z340.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z341.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z342.jpg

As well as:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z349.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z350.jpg

So, the artifact is too clearly defined to have merely disappeared prior to the headshot, and since it clearly provides an item for reference of progression, it's elimination at various points which have now been identified, certainly makes it's disappearance appear to be far more than some mere circumstance.

Another item, and I would have to look for the specific instance(s), the artifact is in fact clear at other times when the film area itself is blurred.

Thus providing additional support that it is either a camera induced/contamination artifact; a projector induced artifact; or an overlay artifact.

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z351.jpg

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z211.jpg

The artifact would appear to change sizes between frames.

Frames 195/196.

If it's a physical part of the camera, wouldn't the size/shape of the artifact stay consistant?

chris

Chris;

I have looked at that "artifact" until almost blind! And, have yet to figure it out!

It's often change in what appears to be size, as well as clarity, continues as an "unknown" of which I have almost given up hope of resolving.

It has been isolated; enlarged; flipped; rotated to the right; rotated to the left; turned upside down, etc; ect;, and I have yet to resolve exactly what it is. And, although I have determined that it almost exactly matches certain items, I would be reluctant to mention it here as there are far too many who "see" things which are not there without opening another door to the rabbit's den.

This is partially why I have pointed it out, as too often, one gets those blinders on and can not see the tree for the forest, and perhaps another non-blocked mind may just figure it out.

Nevertheless, it becomes another integral part of David's hope to prove the current Z-film as being tampered with, as a repetetive and recurrent artifact, whether from the camera or from being projected during film duplication, does not merely "vanish" into oblivion, only to suddenly appear again several frames later.

Thus, it becomes an important part in determination of where certain ommisions and/or duplications of frames of the film may occur, (such as the appearance on Altgens shoulder), but also, for those who possess the capabilities (which I do not), it also provides a reference item of "progression" of frames of the film.

In event that the anomaly/artifact moves an exact given distance with each frame of the Z-film, which correlates exactly with the same distance of movement of the Presidential Limo, then this is a prime indicator of a staged reproductive frame by frame reprinting of the Zfilm.

As, it would be virtually impossible for someone to hold the camera and "pan" in an exact correlative movement which would make the anomaly/artifact move in exact unison with the movement of the Presidential Limo across the field of view.

Just as in later frames of the film, it would be virtually impossible for someone to "pan" the camera, yet keep the bottom edge of the film in perfect alignment with the top edge of the door/windows of the Presidential Limo.

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z320.jpg

Some items happen to be beyond the realm of human capability, and anyone who could achieve such as this film demonstrates, could be the absolutely best sniper in history, as they could pan from left to right, on a subject matter at varying speeds, which is travelling on a downhill grade, yet maintain an absolutely perfect target alignment.

And still:

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z318.jpg

Maintain this perfect horizontal alignment through, at minimum, three frames of the Z-film which by all established parameters represent points at which the person fully "jiggled" the camera as a result of the sound of the shot which struck some 5-frames previous to the jiggle.

Edited by Thomas H. Purvis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...=8660&st=75

Post #209

314 -0.6010928962 24 -0.5945945946 -0.0064983016

http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z314.jpg

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.ph...=8660&st=75

Post #77

Although no one, that I am aware of, has ever claimed that the motorcycle fender "ghost images" were created by the image of those motorcycle police on Jackie's side of the Limousine, it would be best to immediately eliminate them from any consideration.

The "inside" cop generally had his motorcycle fender blocked from view of Zapruder due to it being forward from the rear of the Presidential Limo, and thus blocked from view by the Limo. (A)

The "outside" cop generally had his motorcycle fender blocked from view of Zapruder due to it being forward from the rear of the inside motorcycle cop's rear portion of the motorcycle, and thus blocked from view by this motorcycle. (B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

http://www.knownknowns.net/

The message is:

That there are known knowns,

there are things we know that we know.

There are known unknowns,

that is to say there are things that we now know, we don't know,

but there are also unknown unknowns,

there are things we do not know, we don't know,

and each year we discover a few more,

of those unknown unknowns.

Certainly makes one want to stand up and sing "Proud to be an American"!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...