Miles Scull Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Larger version of Towner supplied at: http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r25/123steamn/A.gifThe Epipolar Geometric Analysis done by Dale Myers has the Towner film ending approx 10.5 seconds before the 313 headshot. In Z frames that about frame 124, if it existed. Croft photo is taken at Z161, which gives mallet/beermug man approx. 2 seconds to stop waving his arm, reach his mallet/mug and appear as such in Croft's photo. interesting chris Chris, Just to be sure, is this Mallet Man? If not, please point him out. Thx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Miles, That's mallet man. And to make it a little easier, the red arrow points to signal/flash/spotter/? chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Perhaps we can identify another spotter signal or muzzle flash or whatever it may be. (Lady to Hammerman's right)Or, is that just another one of those reflections? Also, hammerman apparently with nothing in hand but a gesture of waving. Towner film with Hammerman stabilized. Let's see, we have Z film damage around 153 and the Croft photo is about 161. Interesting chris Chris, all of your stabilized gifs are great..but they all run much too fast and I know of no way to control them. The speed of one's internet connection seems to determine the speed and having a fast one they zip past at speeds I can't focus on the details...is there someway you can post them with a speed control or is there some standard software that will? Thanks. Otherwise they are great...magical! Peter, Whenever I want to control the speed of a gif, I drag and drop onto Quicktime. Use the arrow keys to control speed. Hope this helps, chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Scull Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Miles,That's mallet man. And to make it a little easier, the red arrow points to signal/flash/spotter/? chris Chris, Thx. Is this relevant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Miles, The flash in Towner appears beyond her right shoulder. (Lady at far right) I'm not sure what that object in Croft is, but it's on the wrong side of her. Also, that object you pointed out is huge, the flash in Towner appears to be alot smaller. Made to look like her hand waving. No waving hand. imo Compare it to other's in the animation. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Gratz Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Kathy, IMO the foolishness of many of the posts here does not merit a serious reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Scull Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 For example, I could say... Chris, I see the flash you are pointing to with your red arrow. Amazing. The position of the flash stays the same, yet flashes several times. That means a not-sun generated flash or glint. Uh Oh! Whoa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Scull Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 Kathy, IMO the foolishness of many of the posts here does not merit a serious reply. Right Tim! Just as your post here does not. So, this is not a serious reply. I quess I lost you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted November 28, 2007 Share Posted November 28, 2007 The circle shows the "gimme cap" being waved by the man just to the west of malletman. He is holding it by the bill. No balloon. No flash. Just a cap. What malletman is waving looks like a large gavel or mallet. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 Do you really consider this a photo study, or is it a form of acquiescence to the originator of this thread?For example, I could say that the lady on the left appears to be holding a red triangle, and perhaps I could further say that it may be indicative of triangulation of fire. While that interpretation is RIDICULOUS, the sad part of this is it fits right in with all the rest of this stuff. Kathy Kathy, Consider the forum gene pool from which such foolishness flows from. Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 Hope that black figure is a tree trunk. For it appears to interfere with the reflection. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miles Scull Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Hope that black figure is a tree trunk. For it appears to interfere with the reflection.chris Just a couple of questions: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 (edited) Just a couple of questions: Use the Willis, and Betzner photo along with the Zapruder film to better help you understand the images. The flash is a woman waving her hand as her palm turns in and out of view. The mentioning of a mallet is pure foolishness. Edited December 2, 2007 by Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernice Moore Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 From Jack...... B.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now