Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Attached is a study of frames from Nix covering minimal seconds. It thoroughly refutes the veracity of the Nix film. It is a very sloppy CARTOON ANIMATION compared to the Z film. If you disagree, please explain why. It is impossible to refute the attached study. Will the provocateurs try to debunk it? Or just more personal attacks? Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Attached is a study of frames from Nix covering minimal seconds. It thoroughly refutes the veracity of the Nix film.It is a very sloppy CARTOON ANIMATION compared to the Z film. If you disagree, please explain why. It is impossible to refute the attached study. Will the provocateurs try to debunk it? Or just more personal attacks? Jack Jack, it appears to me that the position of Kellerman only appears to change because the car is moving forward. The relative positions between him, and Jackies head are obviously the same, but the camera angle pushes Kellerman to the right, and gradually in front of Jackie's head. The same right shift or further distance between two people can be seen between the false illusion widening distance between Jackie and JFK. Duncan Why do you say THE POSITION OF KELLERMAN? He appears in only one of the frames. He is NOT THERE in the others. If you see him, please point him out. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 The number of "mistakes" by the animators is incredible! Here is another. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 The number of "mistakes" by the animators is incredible!Here is another. Jack Simply mind boggling for you, Jack ... isn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 The number of "mistakes" by the animators is incredible!Here is another. Jack Simply mind boggling for you, Jack ... isn't it. Stupid inane insults are not research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Why do you say THE POSITION OF KELLERMAN? He appears in only one of the frames. He is NOT THEREin the others. If you see him, please point him out. Jack He is there Jack, he's just "moving" gradually to the right in front of Jackie's head due to the changing position of everything in the limo in relation to the camera. Simply making your frame a bit lighter shows Kellerman gradually moving to the right. Duncan Duncan...what you point out is Connally's hand and cuff. Connally is hidden by Jackie, not Kellerman. Check the film. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 (edited) Attached is a study of frames from Nix covering minimal seconds. It thoroughly refutes the veracity of the Nix film.It is a very sloppy CARTOON ANIMATION compared to the Z film. If you disagree, please explain why. It is impossible to refute the attached study. Will the provocateurs try to debunk it? Or just more personal attacks? Jack Amazing, will Jack White EVER master the principal of parallax? Perhaps some education might be in order: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax Edited February 28, 2008 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Another one. For an instant a yellow object appears beside Kellerman. An the SEAT BACK of his front seat is not seen. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Attached is a study of frames from Nix covering minimal seconds. It thoroughly refutes the veracity of the Nix film.It is a very sloppy CARTOON ANIMATION compared to the Z film. If you disagree, please explain why. It is impossible to refute the attached study. Will the provocateurs try to debunk it? Or just more personal attacks? Jack Amazing, will Jack White EVER master the principal of parallax? Perhaps some education might be in order: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax I know all about parallax. It does not apply to these Nix anomalies. Insults are not research. Questions are not answers. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Attached is a study of frames from Nix covering minimal seconds. It thoroughly refutes the veracity of the Nix film.It is a very sloppy CARTOON ANIMATION compared to the Z film. If you disagree, please explain why. It is impossible to refute the attached study. Will the provocateurs try to debunk it? Or just more personal attacks? Jack Amazing, will Jack White EVER master the principal of parallax? Perhaps some education might be in order: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax I know all about parallax. No, you don't. You have proven that many times over. It does not apply to these Nix anomalies. Yes it does to the images in question in this post. The Limo moved and parallax caused Kellerman to move behind Nellie. You made a mountain out of a molehill because you don't understand one of the very basic principals of photography. Insults are not research. There were no insults, just a statement of fact about your proven lack of understanding of Parallex. Questions are not answers. My question gave you the answer. That you choose to ignore your ignorance of the subject matter is your problem. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Lamson Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 (edited) The Limo moved and parallax caused Kellerman to move behind Nellie. Craig Craig.....Did you mean to say Kellerman moved in front of Jackie, or do you think I have got it wrong? Duncan Thank you Duncan, your are correct, I should have typed Jackie instead of Nellie Edited February 28, 2008 by Craig Lamson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 The Limo moved and parallax caused Kellerman to move behind Nellie. Craig Craig.....Did you mean to say Kellerman moved in front of Jackie, or do you think I have got it wrong? Duncan Thank you Duncan, your are correct, I should have typed Jackie instead of Nellie That is CONNALLY behind Jackie. What is seen is his hand. NOTE THE WHITE CUFF. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 (edited) Are you ready for this? What was a wedding party doing watching the parade? Were you aware of the "WEDDING PARTY" filmed by Nix? Nix shows a very incongruous group in the Houston crowd. The limo passes two women in ankle length white dresses. With them is a man dressed in what could be a black tuxedo. Is somebody pulling our leg? Jack Edited February 28, 2008 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Before anyone replies to this, uh, enlightening information, PLEASE be as non offensive and polite as is humanly possible, given the circumstances. Kathy...I want to report the above "condescending" remarks to a moderator as being offensive to me. Given what "circumstances"??? My age? Just what, "uh, enlightening information" are you referring to? I consider this an insult to my intelligence. How do I report this to a moderator? I request that moderators alter this offensive posting. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 That is CONNALLY behind Jackie. What is seen is his hand. NOTE THE WHITE CUFF.Jack My arrow is pointing precisely at Kellerman's head, even more precisely, his left ear. The white cuff is just about to vanish in front of Jackie ( as we view the frame ) in the next couple of frames. Duncan If that is Kellerman THEN HE IS KISSING CONNALLY ON THE LIPS, as Connally's head can be seen on the other side of Jackie's pink hat. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now