Interesting photo oddity

[Jack White]

Cropped from two different images, these two pix are on an "identical"

line of sight. Seems unlikely to me. What do you think?

Jack

[Bill Miller]

Cropped from two different images, these two pix are on an "identical"

line of sight. Seems unlikely to me. What do you think?

Jack

I think it doesn't take a lot of imagination to understand how that could happen. Two people just off of each others LOS is one way. One camera zoomed past one photographer but close to the same LOS is another. No mystery to me.

[Jack White]

It is disappointing that there were no meaningful responses to this interesting

study. I was hoping to see whether anyone made the startling discovery that I did.

The color image is from the "Nix film". The bw image is from "Altgens 5".

The "interesting oddity study" resulted when I was searching the Nix and

Hughes films to see whether Altgens could be seen standing in the intersection

taking "Altgens 5" (he is not there). It shows that the two photos were taken

ON AN IDENTICAL LINE OF SIGHT. (Of course, Altgens denied that he

took that bw photo.)

While conducting this study of the films, I made numerous IMPORTANT

observations, including the frame below, which appears to be a hand-painted

alteration to Nix. More later.

Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see how the debunk agents will explain

this one.

Jack

[Jack White]

What? No cry yet of COMPRESSION ARTIFACTS?

If that is your argument, what is being "compressed"?

And why does it form an oval shape? And for so many

frames? And why does the rest of the photo exhibit NO

similar "artifacts"?

Jack

[Jack White]

Come on folks. Pay attention. This is VERY IMPORTANT. Please study the

image and comment!

Jack

[Jack White]

It has been nearly four hours and not a single provocateur has commented

yet on the mysterious gray oval in Nix. I must have them perplexed. Come on,

guys...are you waiting for orders from headquarters?

Jack

[Michael Crane]

I`m sorry Jack,the only difference I can see in the 1st pic is what is directly in front of the man on the far left ...sorry.

[Frank Agbat]

Come on folks. Pay attention. This is VERY IMPORTANT. Please study the

image and comment!

Jack

Here are better copies of the frame in question.

Later on, the "mystery object" reappears with a friend:

I see nothing in these frames (the pairs are from a first and second generation copy from the NFV video) that indicates anything other than something (someone) in Nix's line of sight. The textures look like cloth, at least on initial glance.

[Jack White]

I`m sorry Jack,the only difference I can see in the 1st pic is what is directly in front of the man on the far left ...sorry.

I am asking about the gray oval shape in the foreground in the Nix frame. You must

have misunderstood.

Jack

[Jack White]

Come on folks. Pay attention. This is VERY IMPORTANT. Please study the

image and comment!

Jack

Here are better copies of the frame in question.

Later on, the "mystery object" reappears with a friend:

I see nothing in these frames (the pairs are from a first and second generation copy from the NFV video) that indicates anything other than something (someone) in Nix's line of sight. The textures look like cloth, at least on initial glance.

Ok...look at all the frames in sequence, and tell me what the fabric is.

I spent an hour looking at it frame by frame and cannot determine it to

be any imaginable object.

Jack

[Jack White]

Thanks for the clearer captures, Frank. Your capture equipment is superior to mine.

My screen grabs were all a little dark, so I applied AUTO CONTRAST to brighten

the images a little.

Jack

[Frank Agbat]

I really don't know what it is. In the later frames of that sequence, another object enters the field of view and is obviously someone's arm/shoulder. The textures between the two objects look similar to me (cloth), but I can't be certain that this is really the case.

<edit -- hit Post too soon>

It seems to be motionless during the frames where it appears. We first see it in frame 19, and it is off by frame 83 as Nix pans left. It re-appears as Nix pans back to the right to pick up LBJ's car.

Edited February 27, 2008 by Frank Agbat

[Jack White]

I really don't know what it is. In the later frames of that sequence, another object enters the field of view and is obviously someone's arm/shoulder. The textures between the two objects look similar to me (cloth), but I can't be certain that this is really the case.

<edit -- hit Post too soon>

It seems to be motionless during the frames where it appears. We first see it in frame 19, and it is off by frame 83 as Nix pans left. It re-appears as Nix pans back to the right to pick up LBJ's car.

It gets better. In one frame the person you mention standing close to Nix

becomes TRANSPARENT, and the trunk of the Queen Mary is seen through

the person!

Jack

[Jack White]

I really don't know what it is. In the later frames of that sequence, another object enters the field of view and is obviously someone's arm/shoulder. The textures between the two objects look similar to me (cloth), but I can't be certain that this is really the case.

<edit -- hit Post too soon>

It seems to be motionless during the frames where it appears. We first see it in frame 19, and it is off by frame 83 as Nix pans left. It re-appears as Nix pans back to the right to pick up LBJ's car.

It gets better. In one frame the person you mention standing close to Nix

becomes TRANSPARENT, and the trunk of the Queen Mary is seen through

the person!

Jack

And in that same frame, A LITTLE GIRL APPEARS AS IF BY MAGIC!

PS...I should not have said "LESS THAN ONE SECOND" because I did not

actually time it or count frames. It is the amount of time it took the QM

to move about 20 feet.

Jack

Edited February 27, 2008 by Jack White

[Bill Miller]

Ok...look at all the frames in sequence, and tell me what the fabric is.

I spent an hour looking at it frame by frame and cannot determine it to

be any imaginable object.

Jack

I can't see reading the rest of this same ol' - same ol', so if someone else has already said that its the right shoulder of a man in a suit, then sorry for repeating the obvious.

Bill Miller