Jump to content
The Education Forum

backyard photo


Jack White
 Share

Recommended Posts

My recollection is that the "backyard photo" was an American convention for at least a decade after 1963. It allowed the house-proud to get the house in the shot, without taking the photo in front of the house and seeming pretentious - or causing the nosy neighbors to come over.

Perhaps Jack has some shadow effects to compare, however.

Edited by David Andrews
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Bernice. The house is in Fort Worth. The photo was taken in 1944 of a sailor who died on the

carrier Franklin in the Pacific in WWII. It is a genuine photo.

The other photo from 1963 was used to frame a patsy for crimes he did not commit. The photo

is faked.

Glad you noticed the similarity of the backyards. Notice the shadows too.

Jack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake? end of Quote...

well said peter..thank you..hear hear...b.. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

Great post Peter I was :) at the pain of having your fingertips cut off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

What kind of insanity are you spewing now Lumpkin? Short fingers? Not hardly. Wrong shadows...wrong again. Body proportions that dont match WHAT? Oh that stupid and very wrong newspaper study...why it's wrong flies completely over your head. Identical photo positonis...not even close.

In other words Lumpkin is just full of caca today as usual.

Maybe you should stay away from the JFK photography...its simply beyond your ken....

Edited by Craig Lamson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

Great post Peter I was :lol: at the pain of having your fingertips cut off

Hey deano, why not give us your expert analysis of why you know the fingers are too short. That should be good for some grins tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

Great post Peter I was :lol: at the pain of having your fingertips cut off

Hey deano, why not give us your expert analysis of why you know the fingers are too short. That should be good for some grins tonight.

Peter is a Hall of Famer

Your still in Little League Craig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

Great post Peter I was :lol: at the pain of having your fingertips cut off

Hey deano, why not give us your expert analysis of why you know the fingers are too short. That should be good for some grins tonight.

Peter is a Hall of Famer

Your still in Little League Craig

Yea, Lumpkin is in the A-holes hall of fame to be sure. He loves calling folks Nazi's. Really nice guy that Lumpkin.

And he's just like you deano...along with your master Jack. None of you can fight your eway out of a paper bag when it comes to photography.

Now about those stubby fingers deano...

Little league, eh,? Heck you don't even understand the game...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Among all the MANY anomalies in the BYPs [multiple!], I dare anyone to stand at the angle 'Oswald' is standing and not fall over....or cry in pain having your finger tips cut-off....or complain not having your own chin on.....or be carrying two papers that represented opposing viewpoints...or having body proportions that don't match to the paper's known size, problems with the rifle, or the shadows being all wrong or the impossibility of hand held identical photo positions et al.....most of these first pointed out by Jack White. 

Doubt creators for doubt's sake are only here to create confusion and doubt and discredit good researchers [iMO] - while only really discrediting themselves and gives aid and comfort those in our society who were behind [or later covering up] these conspiratorial [not coincidental] crimes, and the CLEAR evidence of them before us. Cui bono from all this 'doubt' and rancid smoke and mirrors for doubt, smoke, and mirror's sake?

Great post Peter I was :lol: at the pain of having your fingertips cut off

Hey deano, why not give us your expert analysis of why you know the fingers are too short. That should be good for some grins tonight.

Peter is a Hall of Famer

Your still in Little League Craig

Yea, Lumpkin is in the A-holes hall of fame to be sure. He loves calling folks Nazi's. Really nice guy that Lumpkin.

And he's just like you deano...along with your master Jack. None of you can fight your eway out of a paper bag when it comes to photography.

Now about those stubby fingers deano...

Little league, eh,? Heck you don't even understand the game...

Do you need a link to Jacks study?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...