Thomas Graves Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Obviously not for the assassination of yet-to-be-elected JFK, but for any "dirty work" that might come along which would require a Marxist, defector-to-Russia-and re-defector "odd duck" patsy? Oswald could have been manipulated into "defecting" to Russia by leading him to believe that he would be functioning there as a high-value CIA or ONI spy, of great interest to the KGB because of his "aviation electronics operator" and U-2 background. --Tommy Edited April 8, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Obviously not for the assassination of yet-to-be-elected JFK, but for any "dirty work" that might come along which would require a Marxist, defector-to-Russia-and re-defector "odd duck" patsy? Oswald could have been manipulated into "defecting" to Russia by leading him to believe that he would be a functioning as a high-value CIA or ONI spy there, of great interest to the KGB because of his "aviation electronics operator" and U-2 background. --Tommy Not manipulated beyond the run-of-the-mill manipulation we are all subjected to throughout our lives re loyalty, for Uncle Sam / king and country and all the rest of it... He was not a spy (as such). If he collected information, it was information which was legal to obtain and to have. He was a courier initially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Milch Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 J. Edgar Hoover had his eye on Oswald long before the assassination of JFK. I'm more prone to believe Hoover set LHO up than whoever was paying him money for Intel work sold him out. I'm no fan of Hoover. BM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 One thing for sure - Oswald's defection could not have been the work of an odd duck acting on his own. He had help, and exactly who was helping him or why remains unknown. I assume that Jon will read this. He posed the difficult to answer question - was Oswald an intelligence agent? In popular culture we have no trouble inserting the word 'secret' before 'agent'. Do 'secret agents' follow some kind of recognizable pattern? Is there a formula for ascertaining whether someone is or isn't a secret agent? Some agents we identify eventually, surely not all. We know almost nothing about agents of military intelligence. We see the tip of the proverbial iceberg. I'm comfortable saying that Oswald was an agent when he entered the USSR. Maybe you are right Thomas, when you suggest that he never really knew the reason he was sent there, or may have believed one thing when his handlers had other motives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted April 8, 2015 Author Share Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Obviously not for the assassination of yet-to-be-elected JFK, but for any "dirty work" that might come along which would require a Marxist, defector-to-Russia-and re-defector "odd duck" patsy? Oswald could have been manipulated into "defecting" to Russia by leading him to believe that he would be a functioning as a high-value CIA or ONI spy there, of great interest to the KGB because of his "aviation electronics operator" and U-2 background. --Tommy Not manipulated beyond the run-of-the-mill manipulation we are all subjected to throughout our lives re loyalty, for Uncle Sam / king and country and all the rest of it... He was not a spy (as such). If he collected information, it was information which was legal to obtain and to have. He was a courier initially. Greg, Once again we disagree. I think Oswald was gullible and wanted to be a spy and, let's face it, he was a Marine Corps "aviation electronics operator" with U-2 experience, and the CIA / ONI took advantage of this and led him to believe that he would be an important spy / U-2 "dangle" in Russia, but the CIA /ONI wasn't planning on using him as a spy / dangle there at all, but only in making him look like an "Odd Duck" Marxist "defector" -- a perfect patsy for any future "dirty work" that might come up in those Cold War years. It's like what Larry Hancock and Jon G. Tidd have said on this forum. Oswald couldn't offer the Russians any information about the U-2 that they didn't already know. They already knew how high it could fly, the codes were changed on a regular basis, etc. But Oswald didn't know all that. Respectfully, --Tommy Edited April 8, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 Greg, Once again we disagree. I believe this situation is allowable within forum rules, terms and conditions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted April 8, 2015 Share Posted April 8, 2015 I agree largely with Greg Parker @ post#2. Largely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 any ideas on how someone with Oswald's background ended up with a MOS of Aviation Electronics Operator? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Hancock Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 In his case it was probably known as being a scope dope.....my guess is that he had picked up some basic electronics and radio from the CAP experience and may even some terminology from reading SF....that could place you well on the career aptitude test....actually it worked for me when I went in the Air Force, I just ended up in comm rather than radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted April 9, 2015 Author Share Posted April 9, 2015 Obviously not for the assassination of yet-to-be-elected JFK, but for any "dirty work" that might come along which would require a Marxist, defector-to-Russia-and re-defector "odd duck" patsy? Oswald could have been manipulated into "defecting" to Russia by leading him to believe that he would be a functioning as a high-value CIA or ONI spy there, of great interest to the KGB because of his "aviation electronics operator" and U-2 background. --Tommy Not manipulated beyond the run-of-the-mill manipulation we are all subjected to throughout our lives re loyalty, for Uncle Sam / king and country and all the rest of it... He was not a spy (as such). If he collected information, it was information which was legal to obtain and to have. He was a courier initially. Dear Greg, I'm not saying he was a spy. I'm saying he thought he was a spy. Respectfully, --Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted April 9, 2015 Author Share Posted April 9, 2015 (edited) any ideas on how someone with Oswald's background ended up with a MOS of Aviation Electronics Operator? Maybe he did well on the Marine Corps aptitude tests for that particular MOS? Just a wild guess on my part. --Tommy Edited April 9, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Knight Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 OK, here's the conundrum: If Oswald was a "dangle," the Soviets weren't biting. The cutting of the wrists was an act of desperation...for some reason. Obviously, if Ozzie had to slash his wrists to be allowed to stay in the Soviet Union, it would have been obvious to whomever set him up as a "dangle" that the Soviets didn't really want him. So the "dangle" was a collossal failure...if it existed at all. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Oswald truly was a "dangle." Let's also assume that perhaps his sponsoring organization--whoever they were--was getting impatient. Perhaps they communicated to him that, if the Soviets didn't allow him to stay by "x" date, the operation [assuming there was some sort of operation] was to be aborted. From those assumptions, it's fairly obvious that Oswald's cutting of the wrists was unscripted, as far as the sponsors' purposes were concerned. At this point, the Soviets had to take him in, from a propaganda standpoint, as a humanitarian gesture. But it can be argued that the Soviets considered such a man as unstable as his American sponsors now did...and therefore Oswald was to serve NO useful purpose, intelligence-wise, in the USSR. From these assumptions, the only way Ozzie COULD have been useful to an American intelligence sponsor would have been as a courier...as Greg Parker has suggested. And I haven't seen a lot of evidence that Oswald was used as a courier...but only because there seems to have been so little investigation of that particular angle. Just my thoughts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted April 9, 2015 Author Share Posted April 9, 2015 (edited) OK, here's the conundrum: If Oswald was a "dangle," the Soviets weren't biting. The cutting of the wrists was an act of desperation...for some reason. Obviously, if Ozzie had to slash his wrists to be allowed to stay in the Soviet Union, it would have been obvious to whomever set him up as a "dangle" that the Soviets didn't really want him. So the "dangle" was a collossal failure...if it existed at all. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Oswald truly was a "dangle." Let's also assume that perhaps his sponsoring organization--whoever they were--was getting impatient. Perhaps they communicated to him that, if the Soviets didn't allow him to stay by "x" date, the operation [assuming there was some sort of operation] was to be aborted. From those assumptions, it's fairly obvious that Oswald's cutting of the wrists was unscripted, as far as the sponsors' purposes were concerned. At this point, the Soviets had to take him in, from a propaganda standpoint, as a humanitarian gesture. But it can be argued that the Soviets considered such a man as unstable as his American sponsors now did...and therefore Oswald was to serve NO useful purpose, intelligence-wise, in the USSR. From these assumptions, the only way Ozzie COULD have been useful to an American intelligence sponsor would have been as a courier...as Greg Parker has suggested. And I haven't seen a lot of evidence that Oswald was used as a courier...but only because there seems to have been so little investigation of that particular angle. Just my thoughts... Dear Mark, Do you understand what I'm saying? The CIA / ONI didn't didn't use Oswald as a spy or even try to use Oswald as a spy. The CIA / ONI just wanted Oswald to believe that he would its spy in Russia so that he would defect, or at least try to defect, to that country in order to get in place for his "spy" work. Why? So that as a future patsy he would appear to be a crazy, "odd duck" Marxist who had defected to Russia. Respectfully, --Tommy Edited April 9, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 In his case it was probably known as being a scope dope.....my guess is that he had picked up some basic electronics and radio from the CAP experience and may even some terminology from reading SF....that could place you well on the career aptitude test....actually it worked for me when I went in the Air Force, I just ended up in comm rather than radar. Good answer, Larry. Additionally, he may have picked up some key terms from Edwin Ekdahl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Obviously not for the assassination of yet-to-be-elected JFK, but for any "dirty work" that might come along which would require a Marxist, defector-to-Russia-and re-defector "odd duck" patsy? Oswald could have been manipulated into "defecting" to Russia by leading him to believe that he would be a functioning as a high-value CIA or ONI spy there, of great interest to the KGB because of his "aviation electronics operator" and U-2 background. --Tommy Not manipulated beyond the run-of-the-mill manipulation we are all subjected to throughout our lives re loyalty, for Uncle Sam / king and country and all the rest of it... He was not a spy (as such). If he collected information, it was information which was legal to obtain and to have. He was a courier initially. Dear Greg, I'm not saying he was a spy. I'm saying he thought he was a spy. Respectfully, --Tommy On what basis, Tommy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now