William Ney Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Here is John Brandenburg's web page, with a lot of detail (from his book, I assume) of the physical evidence behind his thesis that two thermonuclear devices were exploded in the low atmosphere of Mars long ago.He is a plasma physicist out of Lawrence Livermore and worked for decades in various classified governmental R&D programs, including at Sandia and on SDI. His bio can be found on the site. He said this past weekend that in the 11 months since his book was published, only two scientists have written with refutations, each of whom he invited to debate in public; neither has yet taken up the offer. I of course have no opinion of my own but the silence seems rather deafening.http://lifeonmars.pub/articles/mars-thermonuclear-explosion/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Ney Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 (edited) Having listened to all of the chats this past weekend at the 2015 SSP conference, I've been going since through those from the first SSP conference in Oct 2014. The 2014 chats are somewhat uneven, although these so far are worth watching:"The Man-Made vs ET Issue" - Michael Schratt. Runs thru a dozen or so US non-public R&D projects, with little talk of aliens."Bullion, Brains and Bonds" - Joseph Farrell. A history of hidden financing of US covert projects since the GOLD WARRIORS (great 2003 book by Seagraves) bullion windfall of 1945. Much talk here too of the early US efforts postwar to contain/gather German aerospace talent and react to the UFO stories of 1947. This talk also has the virtue of being well organized, unlike the following:"The Black Budget" - Catherine Austin Fitts. Focused on what she describes in (somewhat disorganized) detail as massive chronic fraud within and among the Departments of the Federal government during her time there (bush-quayle). The basic move: Congress allocates money for public projects but the money gets funnelled into the "Black Budget" for covert ops and R&D. She was Ass't Secy at HUD and begins the talk with a quote of Oliver North: "HUD is the candy store for covert revenues." "UFOs, the Tower of Babel Moment, and Space Collateralization" - second talk in 2014 by Jos Farrell. Picks up threads from his first rather factual talk, and works toward his speculative suggestions about the political position of the earth in the cosmos.The Robt Morningstar talk is disorganized, but he shows some very interesting photos of the moon surface. Questions about the moon in general strike me as well founded. Those are the five talks from 2014 that I've so far taken in. All are indexed at this link and free on demand: https://secretspaceprogram.org/presentations-2014/ Edited November 5, 2015 by William Ney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted November 5, 2015 Author Share Posted November 5, 2015 I am surprised but pleased that the interview of me on Dark Journalist has passed the 52,000 view mark in just over four months. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jKBlJQNtek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 I am surprised but pleased that the interview of me on Dark Journalist has passed the 52,000 view mark in just over four months. Doug -I watched it several months ago, you guys did great. I like the fact Dark Journalist always does his homework and gives his guests the time they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Bojczuk Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Perhaps Dr Brandenburg "said that photos of the surface of Mars reveal population centers that had walls around them". He probably meant that photos of the surface of Mars reveal shapes and colours that are not inconsistent with population centers that had walls around them. I'd guess from the absence of media coverage that those shapes and colours are interpreted very differently by a large majority of other specialists.Dr Brandenburg's credentials entitle him to a hearing, but they don't demand that his ideas be accepted uncritically by non-specialists. When faced with a question that requires specialist knowledge, there are two common responses by non-specialists. The rational response is to reflect the views of the whole group of relevant specialists. The irrational response is to pick and choose what to accept, based on your particular personality and ideology.A couple of examples come to mind. A small minority of climate experts doubt the significance of anthropological global warming. An even smaller minority of qualified biologists and geologists claim that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Among the general population, the minority expert view of global warming will seem credible to political reactionaries, and the minority expert view of the earth's history will seem credible to religious fundamentalists. The minority expert view of the Martian landscape will seem credible to science fiction enthusiasts. Not that there's anything wrong with science fiction, of course. I used to read a lot of it when I was 12. D. Caddy is convinced of what Howard Hunt told him in the 70ties: that JFK was killed because he gave away the US-Alien-Secrets to Chairman Khrushchev...he is here to promote this childish idea in one way or another... Thank you for that. I was wondering what this bizarre idea had to do with the JFK assassination.If I wanted to discredit those who question the official account of the assassination, I could do worse than associate their ideas with far-fetched speculations about intergalactic wars. Stay away from those crazy JFK assassination conspiracy theorists! They believe that Martian civilisation was destroyed in a nuclear attack by little green men from the planet Zog! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 I am surprised but pleased that the interview of me on Dark Journalist has passed the 52,000 view mark in just over four months. Doug -I watched it several months ago, you guys did great. I like the fact Dark Journalist always does his homework and gives his guests the time they deserve. The "Dark Journalist" interviewer is a "journalist" of such high caliber that - thanks to his research - Billie Sol Estes' surname is pronounced "Celestes" throughout. Surely we, and Mr. Caddy, have been misinformed for decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted November 5, 2015 Author Share Posted November 5, 2015 (edited) Carl Shoffler, the Washington, D.C police detective who arrested the Watergate burglars on June 17, 1972 mangled Billie Sol Estes' name in a deposition taken of him by Len Colodny in 1995. Shoffler was a military intelligence agent assigned to the Washington, D.C. police and knew in advance of the break-in plan, which was why he was parked in a police car a block away from the Watergate complex when the security guard called police headquarters. In his deposition he disclosed that Heidi Rikan, the madam who ran the prostitution ring out of the Democratic National Committee, had been the mistress of Billie Sol Estes (what a small world it is.) One of the purposes of the burglars was to copy the list of clients in the prostitution books that were thought to be in the Democratic National Committee. Colodny's voluminous depositions and materials on Watergate at now preserved at Texas A&M University. Many Non-Texan and non-Hispanic persons have trouble pronouncing Billie Sol Estes' name. It is not a common American name. http://www.amazon.com/White-House-Call-Girl-Watergate/dp/1936239906/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1446739473&sr=1-1&keywords=Watergate+Call+Girl Edited November 5, 2015 by Douglas Caddy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Many Non-Texan and non-Hispanic persons have trouble pronouncing Billie Sol Estes' name. It is not a common American name. But only a "journalist" who had read no books and articles in preparation could spend an hour mistaking Billy Sol Estes' surname as "Celestes," a conflation of his middle and last names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted November 5, 2015 Author Share Posted November 5, 2015 Making a running issue over the pronunciation of Billie Sol Estes' name by Dark Journalist is pure nit-picking. Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines nit-picking as "minute and usually unjustified criticism." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Ney Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 William, your blog entry is superb, right on target. I am forwarding it to Daniel Liszt at Dark Journalist who interviewed me recently on the subject. I wish to add to my original above posting the observation made by physicist John Brandenberg at this weekend's space conference. He said that the Government gave him permission to go public with what he had uncovered and discovered and that he had concluded the Government did this because the time may soon be upon us (Earth) when certain momentous events will take place. He said that he detected a quality of urgency in the action by the Government. Aha. Glad you liked it. I've been listening to your Dark Journ interview today. Just now arriving at the closing section, beginning with Your Lunch With Howard Hunt ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Caddy Posted November 17, 2015 Author Share Posted November 17, 2015 This roundtable discussion offers a great introduction into what the 2015 Secret Space Conference was all about. Lots of provocative ideas are discussed that challenge the accepted version of reality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cydtragHNy8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now