Richard Booth Posted September 21, 2020 Share Posted September 21, 2020 I'm surprised this guy is held in such high regard among spooks given that he can't carry out a deception without broadcasting to everyone that he's lying, through his language as much as through his body language and everything else. Note that when Mark Lane asked Helms about Clay Shaw, Helms said "can you refresh my memory as to who Clay Shaw was" Helms used the past-tense, was, because Clay Shaw was dead and he knew it. Had Helms actually not known who Shaw was he would have said "refresh my memory as to who Clay Shaw is" You would think that an intelligence professional would be better at lying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted September 21, 2020 Share Posted September 21, 2020 I showed this in Dallas way back right after it was on. The whole audience cracked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted September 21, 2020 Share Posted September 21, 2020 Reminds me of Dan Rather years ago when some host on TV (I forget who) asked him what he thought about Juanita Broaddrick, who was in the news at the time. Instead of saying he believed her, didn't believe her, or wasn't sure, the great journalist Rather said, "Who's Juanita Broaddrick?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 21, 2020 Share Posted September 21, 2020 Oh god, what a gem this is, he is awful. Imagine him on a witness stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Butler Posted September 21, 2020 Share Posted September 21, 2020 (edited) 11 hours ago, Richard Booth said: You would think that an intelligence professional would be better at lying Richard, I have to agree. All those CIA guys were XXXXX. They never told the truth about much of anything. I have seen this before. Helms liked jerking the chains of lots of people, including the interviewer. You can see he is getting satisfaction from this. Helms, like Bill Clinton, was a good 12 year old xxxx. That's a xxxx who denies something, but offers no proof to support this denial except the worthiness of their character. Sorry about about all the XXXX's. Next time I will find a better way to describe a deceptive person. Edited September 21, 2020 by John Butler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now