Micah Mileto Posted October 10, 2022 Author Share Posted October 10, 2022 4 hours ago, Ron Ecker said: Knowing nothing about ballistics, I'm very confused. Though I won't dispute it, I don't understand how a bullet could blow out the back of JFK's head, yet the bullet itself remained in the head, lodged behind the right ear. And if a shot from the right front entered behind the right ear and remained there, that means it barely entered his head, as if it were a bad round. And if was an explosive bullet designed to leave no trace of itself, why was the bullet itself still there? I have always thought, perhaps naively, that a bullet blowing out the back of the head would be gone out the back of the head. I never would have dreamed the bullet could have stayed close to where it entered the head. A bullet "lodged behind the President's ear" could also come from an EOP wound. We already entertain the possibility of a shallow back wound, why not a shallow EOP wound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted October 10, 2022 Share Posted October 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, Micah Mileto said: A bullet "lodged behind the President's ear" could also come from an EOP wound. We already entertain the possibility of a shallow back wound, why not a shallow EOP wound? I thought Joseph McBride, in his post on the Belmont memo, was arguing that the bullet lodged behind the right ear may have been the one fired by Badge Man and which blew out the back of the head. That's what I don't understand, but maybe I read it wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Lifton Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 (edited) On 10/2/2022 at 8:51 AM, Micah Mileto said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUKeXpBhRiE Never heard of this one. Hi Micah: RE: Report of JFK being placed in a "plastic casket" I'm (a bit) surprised that you never heard of this before. But, as the saying goes, "better late than never". FWIW: I pursued this matter, in detail, many years ago, and prior to the publication of B. E. (Jan 1981). But I was unable to include any of what I knew in B.E. Please send me your email address (I may be able to tell you more). Its a very important issue, but, IMHO:the poster's interpretation is seriously incorrect. DSL 10/19/22 - 9:50 AM PDT My email: dlifton@gmail.com). 10/19/22 - 9:45 AM PDT Edited October 19, 2022 by David Lifton Improve clarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted May 15, 2023 Author Share Posted May 15, 2023 (edited) Who actually wrote the report of a "bronze-colored plastic casket"? There's no name signed on the page in question, just a squiggle I can't make out. People seem to think it's from Dr. Kemp Clark, perhaps in the wrong order of pages. As Harold Weisberg explained in some of his personal notes, "...There is also a typed document (report 516-8), not in Clark's "own hand" about which there is some mystery. It is, in fact, not dated. It is signed. The third page is numbered 2 and the second page which appears to be the first is numbered 1. The first page is not complete and is less than a half page in length with the word "Statement" written in a neat hand in the upper right. The rest of the sheet has been out off and the reproduction shows only the part of the page with the typing. It seems to be in a different typing than the other two pages. It is this part which begins with the statement that the President arrived at exactly 12:43 p.m.. The second page has a heading, "Summary". This also is one of the cases the time of 12:43 wasn't changed to 12:38, important if the tenuous Oswald time reconstruction isn't to be destroyed. Elsewhere ( ) it is indicated that this cut-off sheet of typing was a letter addressed to the President's doctor". http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/C Disk/Clark William Kemp/Item 01.pdf https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=946#relPageId=540 https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1134#relPageId=27 Edited May 16, 2023 by Micah Mileto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Govus Posted May 16, 2023 Share Posted May 16, 2023 I am way late checking this thread out. I came in at the present point. So I'll start at beginning, but @Micah Mileto and anyone else interested in the first item Micah linked to in the above post, the .pdf link above downloads with zero bytes in it. You must download that .pdf directly from it's hosting page at http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/C Disk/Clark William Kemp/ Item 01 downloaded for me okay that way. Four pages of Weisberg's personal notes. What a mensch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micah Mileto Posted May 16, 2023 Author Share Posted May 16, 2023 8 hours ago, George Govus said: I am way late checking this thread out. I came in at the present point. So I'll start at beginning, but @Micah Mileto and anyone else interested in the first item Micah linked to in the above post, the .pdf link above downloads with zero bytes in it. You must download that .pdf directly from it's hosting page at http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg Subject Index Files/C Disk/Clark William Kemp/ Item 01 downloaded for me okay that way. Four pages of Weisberg's personal notes. What a mensch. The Archive.org version of Weisberg's archive has more files than jfk.hood.edu! I don't know what else is different, but it's different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now