New article at KENNEDYS & KING: JFK Secret Service Agent Paul Landis Makes a Big Splash In 2023...But How Credible Is He?

[Benjamin Cole]

The FBI lab detected copper on JFK's shirt and jacket, sites rear-entry wounds. 

In other words, consistent with a copper-jacketed bullet striking JFK. of the type Landis said he found. 

We can say, "Oh, well, the FBI lied and Landis is mistaken." 

But when do we believe FBI lab results and when not? And when do we believe witnesses and when not? 

 

[Cliff Varnell]

2 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

The FBI lab detected copper on JFK's shirt and jacket, sites rear-entry wounds. 

In other words, consistent with a copper-jacketed bullet striking JFK. of the type Landis said he found. 

We can say, "Oh, well, the FBI lied and Landis is mistaken." 

But when do we believe FBI lab results and when not?

After the introduction of CE399 the FBI Lab was not credible.

2 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

 

And when do we believe witnesses and when not? 

 

When their accounts are corroborated by ear witnesses, eye witnesses, photographs/film, physical evidence (see Bennett, Glen).

[Benjamin Cole]

1 minute ago, Cliff Varnell said:

After the introduction of CE399 the FBI Lab was not credible.

When their accounts are corroborated by ear witnesses, eye witnesses, photographs/film, physical evidence (see Bennett, Glen).

One could argue, Landis has "corroborated" the findings of the FBI that there was copper on the bullet-entry holes in JFK short and coat...by finding a copper-jacketed slug on the top of the rear seat of the limo. 

And the Landis revelation "corroborates" the observations of the two FBI agents at the autopsy that the rear back entry wound of JFK may not have transited the body. 

This becomes subjective, no? 

CV, you may believe you have divine insights into the JFKA. Others have other conclusions. 

 

 

[Cliff Varnell]

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

One could argue, Landis has "corroborated" the findings of the FBI that there was copper on the bullet-entry holes in JFK short and coat...by finding a copper-jacketed slug on the top of the rear seat of the limo. 

How does the Landis bullet associate with the back wound, other than the requirements of your pet theory?  How would Landis know if the round were planted or not?

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

And the Landis revelation "corroborates" the observations of the two FBI agents at the autopsy that the rear back entry wound of JFK may not have transited the body. 

You assume the truth of your pet theory.

1 hour ago, Benjamin Cole said:

This becomes subjective, no? 

CV, you may believe you have divine insights into the JFKA. Others have other conclusions. 

 

 

I don’t have “divine insights” — I have ear witness testimonies, eye witness testimonies, photographs, the Zfilm and physical evidence.

According to your pet theory JFK was hit in the back with a hunk of metal that damaged no organs — and for 6 seconds he didn’t say a word.   He had time to warn the others, or duck down.  But instead he reacted to a strike in his upper back by balling his fists in front of his throat and remaining mute.

What a crock!