Denis Morissette Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 My request to participate to alt.conspiracy.jfk.research has just been declined. The cover-up continues… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ulrik Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, Denis Morissette said: My request to participate to alt.conspiracy.jfk.research has just been declined. The cover-up continues… I think Gil took over the group. Its sole purpose seems to be to increase traffic to his website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Morissette Posted May 16 Author Share Posted May 16 10 minutes ago, Mark Ulrik said: I think Gil took over the group. Its sole purpose seems to be to increase traffic to his website. OK. He doesn’t want true facts getting in the way. I get that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 (edited) 4 hours ago, Denis Morissette said: My request to participate to alt.conspiracy.jfk.research has just been declined. The cover-up continues… The URL of the group in question specifically says it is "Not Moderated", so why would anybody be "declined" when trying to post/join? I would think it would have the same rules as the old alt.conspiracy.jfk newsgroup, which, of course, had no posting rules or restrictions at all. https://groups.google.com/g/jfk-assassination-not-moderated Edited May 16 by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W. Niederhut Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 The title of this thread is an oxymoron, at least in the case of JFKA research. It's like writing, "Democrats Keep On Cutting Taxes for Billionaires." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Morissette Posted May 16 Author Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, David Von Pein said: The URL of the group in question specifically says it is "Not Moderated", so why would anybody be "declined" when trying to post/join? I would think it would have the same rules as the old alt.conspiracy.jfk newsgroup, which, of course, had no posting rules or restrictions at all. https://groups.google.com/g/jfk-assassination-not-moderated NoTrueFlag wrote “Even Nutters can say what they will. If Google really does cut access to Usenet.” I can’t even join. 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Cairns Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 5 hours ago, Denis Morissette said: OK. He doesn’t want true facts getting in the way. I get that. I’m a sucker for good fact… let’s hear it Dennis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denis Morissette Posted May 17 Author Share Posted May 17 5 hours ago, Johnny Cairns said: I’m a sucker for good fact… let’s hear it Dennis? The topic is my membership refusal. I’ve got over it already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gil Jesus Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 (edited) On 5/16/2024 at 8:24 AM, Denis Morissette said: My request to participate to alt.conspiracy.jfk.research has just been declined. The cover-up continues… The Google group is a format I started for critics and researchers to post their research into the assassination. The content is not moderated, ( how's that for covering up the truth ? Are you listening, John McAdams ? ) but membership must be approved by me. Are you a critic of the Warren Commission ? Are you a researcher ? When you applied, you stated that you wanted to "discuss the JFKA". It's not a discussion group or a format for debate like this forum. And since I am not familiar with your research and you offered no insight into it, I assumed you were neither a researcher nor a critic of the Warren Commission. So your request was denied. For example, Pamela Brown recently requested membership and was approved because I'm familiar with her research on the JFK limo. PS: For anyone interested, the group can be found at this link: https://groups.google.com/g/jfk-assassination-not-moderated The postings can be read by anyone, but in order to post you must be a member. If I am not familiar with your research, it might be a good idea to fill me in as to what it involves. A link to your website or work online would be helpful. Since you consider your denial for membership a big enough deal to post it here, maybe you or your Lone Nut buddies can explain how your failure to qualify for acceptance "covers up the truth" or translates into my wanting to prevent "true facts getting in the way". SMH Edited May 20 by Gil Jesus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Bauer Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 (edited) The second Lee Harvey Oswald told the world press "I am just a patsy" the evening of 11,22,1963 in response to the press shouted question " did you kill the President?" only a dimwit would not be at least a little suspiciously curious about that statement as it was one not usually uttered by arrested perps and clearly suggests something more to the crime story and the perps involvement in it. To rational people anyway. Oswald's killing ( silencing ) just 46 hours after JFK's and under circumstances so improbable ( an armed, sleazy strip joint owner gets inside the DPD's own building and defeats the 70+ personnel wall of Oswald security? ) was the real kicker in the rational conspiracy consideration department. Half the nation instantly sensed some sort of conspiracy in the entire JFKA affair after that beyond belief security failure debacle ... as they should have. IMO, kook defines anyone who instantly thought there was nothing more to the impossibly improbable Oswald security breakdown right inside the DPD's own building than just "luck" on the part of another kook who was so paranoid fear driven to prove to the world that Jews had guts. Edited May 20 by Joe Bauer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ulrik Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 Discussion is not allowed in Gil's group, but at least it's unmoderated 🙃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now