Jump to content
The Education Forum

FROM DALLAS TO GAZA: HOW JFK’S ASSASSINATION WAS GOOD FOR ZIONIST ISRAEL


Recommended Posts

On 8/14/2024 at 4:41 PM, Douglas Caddy said:

This is a very important article even though I do not believe Israel, Jews, Mossad or Zionism had anything to do with the JFK assassination.

Lyndon Johnson was in a political alliance going back decades with many rich or powerful or smart or effective or well-respected Jewish leaders. Almost all of these people were hard core Zionists and this relationship definitely warped USA policy towards the Middle East, Israel and its Arab neighbors.

I could make a list of all of LBJ's A-list Jewish friends, but I think I might go to bed now. Suffice it to say Lyndon Johnson was in close personal political allegiance over decades with scores of rich, powerful Zionist Jews. LBJ's mother wrote him a letter when he was Majority Leader, at the top of his power in the Senate and said take care of the Jews, they are God's chosen people. That letter is in the hands of a private collector in Texas. Obviously, LBJ had family members who are ardently Christian Zionist.

RM

8/16/24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

This article strikes me as the usual anti-Semitic crackpot fare. 

The rich, powerful Zionist Jews tried to buy off JFK in the 1960 campaign. They told him we will pay your entire bill if you will give us full reign over Israel policy. JFK disgustedly turned then down before he was elected president.

Then JFK was assassinated on 11/22/63 and Superman Zionist Lyndon Johnson comes into the White House and gives Israel more than they could ever dream of from an American administration.

Some people like Jews Joan Mellen, Noam Chomsky and good ole Albert Einstein think that Zionism is a crackpot philosophy.

I am in the Albert Einstein camp.

Ben Cole, are you of Jewish descent? You seem to conflate anti Zionism with anti-Semitism. (I am not Jewish.)

Yes, of course, the vast majority of Jews worldwide support Israel. 

Edited by Robert Morrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The author is correct. Kennedy's policy was much more even handed.  For example on Palestinian repatriation for the Nakba.

And JFK never stopped trying to push that policy even until 1963.  This was when the UN author, Joseph Johnson, had given up on it.

Kennedy also tried to forge a relationship with Nasser, a secularist Arab leader.

When Nasser got the news of Kennedy's death, he could not sleep.  He then ordered JFK's funeral to be shown four times on Egyptian television.

And Bob is correct on this, Johnson changed Kennedy's policy a lot.

I have very little doubt the 1967 war would hot have happened if Kennedy had lived.

Just remember, as a rising diplomat, Benjy N slept in Jared Kushner's bedroom in NYC.

 

 

Edited by James DiEugenio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is true but knowing Joe Kennedy it PROBABLY IS:

Joe Kennedy paid right wingers to attack his son John Kennedy as a “Jewish puppet”

 https://www.unz.com/article/jfk-jr-and-the-jewish-curse-on-the-kennedys/

 John Hughes-Wilson:

 QUOTE

 Joseph Kennedy solved the problem in 1956 by secretly asking a prominent media and entertainment business mogul called Joe Hooker to orchestrate a right-wing press campaign against his son, by accusing the then Senator Jack Kennedy of being a “Jewish puppet”, secretly in hock to Jewish interests and influences. Hooker and his neo-Fascist contacts duly smeared JFK in the Press. “Kikes for Kennedy” ran one headline. The American Nazi party denounced him as a “Jew lover”. The Jewish lobby was impressed and so, when the request for campaign funds duly appeared, Jewish political financiers decided to back Kennedy

 UNQUOTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bobby Kennedy wanted the forerunner of AIPAC to register as a foreign lobby.

I think Ric's article says this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In preparing for my talk on this at the last Wecht Conference, one of the most interesting things I found out was this: the Muslim Brotherhood was created by the British.

This is how complex and tangled the history of that area is.

That fact helps explain why Nasser was considered one of the most influential leaders of the Arab world next to Mohammed and Saladin. And why six million people poured into Cairo for his funeral. For many Arabs he was the future, the way out of Moslem Fundamentalism.  And Kennedy was visionary enough to see this.

If you have not seen this speech, you really should. It explains a lot about Nasser and the Brotherhood in less than three minutes. And why people were paralyzed with grief at Nasser's  funeral. It was the symbolic equivalent of Bobby Kennedy's funeral in America.

 

Edited by James DiEugenio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

In preparing for my talk on this at the last Wecht Conference, one of the most interesting thing I found out was this: the Muslim Brotherhood was created by the British.

This is how complex and tangled the history of that area is.

That fact helps explain why Nasser was considered one of the most influential leaders of the Arab world next to Mohammed and Saladin. And why six million people poured into Cairo for his funeral. For many Arabs he was the future, the way out of Moslem Fundamentalism.  And Kennedy was visionary enough to see this.

If you have not seen this speech, you really should. It explains a lot about Nasser and the Brotherhood in less than three minutes. And why people were paralyzed with grief at Nasser's  funeral. It was the symbolic equivalent of Bobby Kennedy's funeral in America.

 

Robert Dreyfuss goes into this topic in Devil’s Game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is correct and that is one of the books I used in preparation  for that talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1996 article by Donald Neff on Lyndon Johnson Aligning U.S. Foreign Policy with Israel’s Interests

https://www.wrmea.org/1996-november-december/middle-east-history-it-happened-in-november.html#.ZAvQDqiCCvo.twitter

Lyndon Johnson Was First to Align U.S. Policy With Israel’s Policies

By Donald Neff

It was 33 years ago, on Nov. 22, 1963, that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. While a traumatized nation grieved for its youngest president, he was succeeded by Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, who was to become the most pro-Israel president up to that time. A sea change was about to take place in America’s relations with Israel.

Johnson was quick to declare his support for the Jewish state. Shortly after being sworn in as president, Johnson reportedly remarked to an Israeli diplomat:

“You have lost a very great friend, but you have found a better one.” Commented Isaiah L. Kenen, one of the most effective lobbyists for Israel in Washington: “I would say that everything he did as president supported that statement.” 1

Up to Johnson’s presidency, no administration had been as completely pro-Israel and anti-Arab as his. Harry S. Truman, while remembered as a warm friend of Israel, was more interested in his own election than Israel’s fate. After winning office on his own in 1948 with the support of the Jewish vote, he seemed to lose interest in the Jewish state.2

Dwight D. Eisenhower was distinctly cool toward Israel, seeing it as a major irritant in America’s relations with the Arab world and U.S. access to oil. There were no powerful partisans of Israel in his administration and his secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, was a frequent critic of Israel. Kennedy was considerably warmer toward the Jewish state and became the first president to begin providing major weapons to it, breaking an embargo in place since 1947.3Yet he valued the U.S. position in the Arab world, particularly with Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser, and as a result maintained a fairly even-handed policy despite having a number of pro-Israel officials in his administration.

All this changed dramatically under Johnson. Not only was he personally a strong supporter of the Jewish state but he had a number of high officials, advisers and friends who shared his view. These included officials within the administration such as McGeorge Bundy, Clark Clifford, Arthur Goldberg, Harry McPherson, John Roche, the Rostow brothers, Walt and Eugene, and Ben Wattenberg.

These officials occupied such high offices as the ambassador to the United Nations, the head of the National Security Council and the number two post at the State Department. They were assiduous in putting forward Israel’s interests in such memoranda as “What We Have Done for Israel” 4 and “New Things We Might Do in Israel” 5 and “How We Have Helped Israel.” 6

The president was repeatedly urged to distance America from the Arab world.

The president was repeatedly urged by Israel’s supporters to embrace Israeli policy, give the Jewish state increased aid, and distance America from the Arab world. So pervasive was the influence of Israel’s supporters during Johnson’s tenure that CIA Director Richard Helms believed there was no important U.S. secret affecting Israel that the Israeli government did not know about in this period.7

So closely allied were U.S. and Israeli interests in the mind of “Mac” Bundy, the special coordinator of Middle East policy during the 1967 war, that he once sought to buttress a recommendation to Johnson by remarking: “This is good LBJ doctrine and good Israeli doctrine, and therefore a good doctrine to get out in public.” 8 When initial war reports showed Israel making dramatic gains and several officials in the State Department Operations Room outwardly showed satisfaction, Undersecretary of State Gene Rostow turned to them with a broad smile on his face and said ironically: “Gentlemen, gentlemen, do not forget we are neutral in word, thought and deed.” 9 In the State Department’s summary of the start of the war, Rostow’s brother, Walt, the national security adviser, wrote on a covering letter to Johnson: “Herewith the account, with a map, of the first day’s turkey shoot.” 10

Beyond the administration’s supporters of Israel, one of Johnson’s closest informal advisers was Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, another warm friend of Israel’s. Two of Johnson’s closest outside advisers were Abraham Feinberg and Arthur B. Krim, both strong supporters of Israel. Feinberg was president of the American Bank & Trust Company of New York and the man whose “activities started a process of systematic fund-raising for politics [in the late 1940s] that has made Jews the most conspicuous fund-raisers and contributors to the Democratic Party,” according to a study by Stephen D. Isaacs, Jews and American Politics. Johnson routinely consulted Feinberg on Middle East policy.

Vocal Supporters of Israel

Feinberg was a vocal supporter of increased aid to Israel. Although an American, Feinberg at various times owned the Coca-Cola franchise in Israel and was a part-owner of the Jerusalem Hilton Hotel. When his bank fell into trouble in the 1970s and two of its officers were convicted of misappropriating funds, the Israeli Bank Leumi Company, in a generous act of reverse aid, purchased Feinberg’s American Bank & Trust Company.11

Arthur Krim was president of United Artists Corporation of Hollywood, a New York attorney and another major Democratic fund-raiser. He served as chairman of the Democratic National Party Finance Committee and chairman of the President’s Club of New York, the most potent source of Johnson’s campaign funds. Krim was married to a physician, Mathilde, who in her youth had briefly served as an agent for the Irgun, the Jewish terrorist group led by Menachem Begin.

The Krims were so close to Johnson that they built a vacation house near his Texas ranch to be close to him on long weekends and were regular guests at the White House. Mathilde Krim stayed at the White House during much of the 1967 war and was a regular caller at the Israeli Embassy, passing reports and gossip back and forth. The Krims, like other Johnson friends, did not hesitate to advise the president on Middle East policy.12

How influential the Krims were in forming Johnson’s Middle East policy was hinted at by notes in the president’s daily diary for June 17, 1967. The notes reported that at a dinner with the Krims and others at Camp David, Johnson openly discussed a speech he was working on that was to establish the nation’s Middle East policy for the years ahead.

According to the notes, Johnson read from various drafts of the speech around the dinner table, “inserting additions and making changes, also accepting comments and suggestions from all at the table.” Thus two passionate partisans of Israel, the Krims, helped Johnson refine what was later called the “five great principles of peace,” the pillars of U.S. policy in the Middle East for the next two decades.

After Johnson delivered the speech on June 19, he received a report of an enthusiastic phone call from Abe Feinberg saying that the Jewish community was delighted with the speech. “Mr. Feinberg said he had visited with Israelis and Jewish leaders all over the country and they are high in their appreciation.” 13

Under Johnson, aid to Israel increased and the old arms embargo was completely shattered, portending the massive transfer of treasure, technology and weapons that began in the next administration of Richard M. Nixon. That, of course, was only the beginning of the age of total support of Israel, which has reached new heights under Bill Clinton.

RECOMMENDED READING

Donovan, Robert J., Conflict and Crisis: The Presidency of Harry S Truman, 1945-1948, New York, W.W. Norton, 1977.

*Green, Stephen, Taking Sides: America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel, New York, William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1984.

*Hersh, Seymour M., The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy, New York, Random House, 1991.

Isaacs, Stephen D., Jews and American Politics, Garden City, NY, Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1974.

Khalidi, Walid (ed.), From Haven to Conquest: Readings in Zionism and the Palestine Problem until 1948, Washington, DC, Institute for Palestine Studies, second printing, 1987.

Miller, Merle, Lyndon: An Oral History , New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1980.

*Neff, Donald, Warriors for Jerusalem: The Six Days that Changed the Middle East, New York, Linden Press/Simon & Schuster, 1984.

*Neff, Donald, Fallen Pillars: U.S. Policy towards Palestine and Israel since 1945, Washington, DC, Institute for Palestine Studies, 1995.

Rubenberg, Cheryl A., Israel and the American National Interest: A Critical Examination , Chicago, University of Illinois Press, 1986.

Wilson, Evan M., Decision on Palestine: How the U.S. came to Recognize Israel, Stanford, CA, Hoover Institution Press, 1979.

FOOTNOTES

1 Miller, Lyndon, p. 477. This was generally the assessment in Israel as well; see Green, Taking Sides, pp. 184-86.

2 See for instance: Wilson, Decision on Palestine, pp. 148-49; Rubenberg, Israel and the American National Interest, pp. 9-10, 31; Khalidi, From Haven to Conquest, pp. liii-lxvii; Donald Neff, “Palestine, Truman and America’s Strategic Balance, 4" American-Arab Affairs, No. 25, Summer 1988, pp. 30-41.

3 Neff, Fallen Pillars, pp. 170-71.

4 State Dept., NEA/IAI:2/8/67; confidential, declassified 4/16/81.

5 W.W. Rostow, Memorandum for the President, 5/21/66; secret, declassified 3/13/79.

6 Unsigned, White House papers, 5/19/66; secret, declassified 3/13/79.

7 Neff, Warriors for Jerusalem, p. 110.

8 Ibid., p. 273.

9 Ibid., p. 213.

10 Rostow to the President, 6/5/67, secret.

11 Isaacs, Jews and American Politics, p. 83. Detailed information on Feinberg, including his aid to Israel’s nuclear program, is in Hersh, The Samson Option, pp. 93-111.

12 Neff, Warriors for Jerusalem, pp. 83, 156-58.

13 “Marvin to the President,” memorandum, 6:30 PM, 19 June 1967, reprinted in Neff, Warriors for Jerusalem, pp. 307-08.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Douglas Caddy said:

Democrats’ party platform doesn’t call for arms embargo on Israel

The 92-page document will be voted on by delegates Monday evening.

 

https://wapo.st/3yKe3Ee

It would be political suicide for either party platform to endorse an arms embargo on Israel.

A handful of Progressive Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, have called for an arms embargo this year, and two of them-- Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush-- have been primaried and defeated this year.

Incidentally, I started a forum thread about this same Rick Sterling article last December, and we had a lengthy discussion about it.

At the time, the civilian death toll in Gaza was 20,000.

Now it's 40,000 +

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, W. Niederhut said:

It would be political suicide for either party platform to endorse an arms embargo on Israel.

A handful of Progressive Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, have called for an arms embargo this year, and two of them-- Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush-- have been primaried and defeated this year.

Incidentally, I started a forum thread about this same Rick Sterling article last December, and we had a lengthy discussion about it.

At the time, the civilian death toll in Gaza was 20,000.

Now it's 40,000 +

Probably twice that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2024 at 11:14 AM, Robert Morrow said:

Feinberg was a vocal supporter of increased aid to Israel. Although an American, Feinberg at various times owned the Coca-Cola franchise in Israel and was a part-owner of the Jerusalem Hilton Hotel. When his bank fell into trouble in the 1970s and two of its officers were convicted of misappropriating funds, the Israeli Bank Leumi Company, in a generous act of reverse aid, purchased Feinberg’s American Bank & Trust Company.

Feinberg coordinated the raising of funding from American and Canadian Jews (including Louis Bloomfeld of Permindex fame) to fund the Dimona reactor. This is detailed in The Bomb in the Basement. It’s not specifically said whether he knew what the money was being raised for but it’s hard to believe that he didn’t know as he likely raised tens of millions of dollars in the late 1950s.

Abe Feinberg was not the simple poor immigrant that made it big. He was instrumental in getting Truman to support the creation of Israel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...