Jack White Posted October 13, 2006 Share Posted October 13, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Slattery Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanet Clark Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 No, just someone with respect for a senior researcher who has worked hard and with courage to de-bunk the lone nut types......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago, trying to play with the big boys these day's, PR dude? Been a long way/time from Shrub standing on that World Trade Tower rubble with a bullhorn, eh? I feel your pain... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Slattery Posted October 14, 2006 Share Posted October 14, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago Gee, I'm impressed. Did they copyright it or something? What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Mauro Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago Gee, I'm impressed. Did they copyright it or something? What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged? ************************************************************* "What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged?" And, what would you know of your ass from a hole in the ground, dickhead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 Been a long way/time from Shrub standing on that World Trade Tower rubble with a bullhorn, eh? I feel your pain...????????????????????????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 (edited) 'Brendan Slattery' wrote: I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago Gee, I'm impressed. Did they copyright it or something? What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged? *************** dgh: nah, you ain't impressed beef-stick, you're one of them loser types from alt.vietnam.war, they're trying to save the republic -- place is full of miscreants and trolls looking for attention -- spend all day trying to defend the impossible, good intentions gone bad. And THAT'S, being kind! When your all grown up there's a few around here who can educate you about the Vietnam war, don't hurry back... Edited October 16, 2006 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wim Dankbaar Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 (edited) Jack, Maybe you could overlay these last two pictures? Make them the same size first, then compare your recreation sizes with the actual sizes. One more thing , you say "Compare with the actual Moorman picture above". It is not the actual Moorman picture, it is you creative colorized "enhancement". The actual Moorman picture is the one right below. Edited October 16, 2006 by Wim Dankbaar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Johansson Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 Jack, Maybe you could overlay these last two pictures? Make them the same size first, then compare your recreation sizes with the actual sizes. One more thing , you say "Compare with the actual Moorman picture above". It is not the actual Moorman picture, it is you creative colorized "enhancement". The actual Moorman picture is the one right below. No need to do that, I can see the point right there! Badgeman and hardhat man were midgets. Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted October 16, 2006 Author Share Posted October 16, 2006 I resent spam email from the "Gang" of provocateurs clogging my my email box. For your information, post anything you have to say to me on this forum. I TRASH UNSOLICITED EMAILS WITHOUT READING. If this applies to you, save your time. Jack To show their stupidity, some of the provocateurs still persist in sending emails to my home computer instead of posting to the forum. I CONTINUE TO DELETE SUCH MESSAGES WITHOUT READING. This morning I had to delete four such messages. You are dumb to continue such juvenile tactics. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Miller Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 No need to do that, I can see the point right there! Badgeman and hardhat man were midgets. Mark Mark, I will not hesitate to call Jack out on a bogus claim because of a poorly researched idea, so do not take it personally when I tell you that you do not know what you are talking about in this instance. I replicated Badge Man by using 6' 3" tall Tony Cummings. Tony stood on the bottom support board of the stockade fence which isn't a mere 6 to 8 " off the ground. Because Moorman was looking uphill at the knoll, the further back from the fence you stand ... the further you sink over the horizon line created by the fence against the background. This means that if a 6' 3" man was two feet behind the fence, then he'd have to be elevated higher than Tony was to achieve the same height appearence from where Moorman stood. So the fact is ... your "midget" response tells me that you are attempting to debate a possibility that you have never spent any effort gathering the needed information to intelligently discuss the matter. In this particular instance, depending on how far behind the fence Jack believes Badge Man to be and depending on Badge Man's actual height which no one really knows - Jack is correct on at least that part of the possibilities of Badge Man's existence. Bill Miller To show their stupidity, some of the provocateurs still persist insending emails to my home computer instead of posting to the forum. I CONTINUE TO DELETE SUCH MESSAGES WITHOUT READING. This morning I had to delete four such messages. You are dumb to continue such juvenile tactics. Jack Jack, how difficult would it be for you to simply put a block on those email addresses that are doing this, then it doesn't happen again unless they keep changing email addresses and I doubt that anyone would find that worth all the trouble. Bill Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted October 16, 2006 Author Share Posted October 16, 2006 No need to do that, I can see the point right there! Badgeman and hardhat man were midgets. Mark Mark, I will not hesitate to call Jack out on a bogus claim because of a poorly researched idea, so do not take it personally when I tell you that you do not know what you are talking about in this instance. I replicated Badge Man by using 6' 3" tall Tony Cummings. Tony stood on the bottom support board of the stockade fence which isn't a mere 6 to 8 " off the ground. Because Moorman was looking uphill at the knoll, the further back from the fence you stand ... the further you sink over the horizon line created by the fence against the background. This means that if a 6' 3" man was two feet behind the fence, then he'd have to be elevated higher than Tony was to achieve the same height appearence from where Moorman stood. So the fact is ... your "midget" response tells me that you are attempting to debate a possibility that you have never spent any effort gathering the needed information to intelligently discuss the matter. In this particular instance, depending on how far behind the fence Jack believes Badge Man to be and depending on Badge Man's actual height which no one really knows - Jack is correct on at least that part of the possibilities of Badge Man's existence. Bill Miller Thanks, Bill...saved me the trouble of explaining that the heights of all the persons involved in the original and recreation control their heights in photos. I must say, however, that one thing has always puzzled me. Gordon Arnold was NOT a tall person, but the person in Moorman 5 that I think is Arnold appears to be tall. Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack White Posted October 16, 2006 Author Share Posted October 16, 2006 (edited) No need to do that, I can see the point right there! Badgeman and hardhat man were midgets. Mark Mark, I will not hesitate to call Jack out on a bogus claim because of a poorly researched idea, so do not take it personally when I tell you that you do not know what you are talking about in this instance. I replicated Badge Man by using 6' 3" tall Tony Cummings. Tony stood on the bottom support board of the stockade fence which isn't a mere 6 to 8 " off the ground. Because Moorman was looking uphill at the knoll, the further back from the fence you stand ... the further you sink over the horizon line created by the fence against the background. This means that if a 6' 3" man was two feet behind the fence, then he'd have to be elevated higher than Tony was to achieve the same height appearence from where Moorman stood. So the fact is ... your "midget" response tells me that you are attempting to debate a possibility that you have never spent any effort gathering the needed information to intelligently discuss the matter. In this particular instance, depending on how far behind the fence Jack believes Badge Man to be and depending on Badge Man's actual height which no one really knows - Jack is correct on at least that part of the possibilities of Badge Man's existence. Bill Miller Thanks, Bill...saved me the trouble of explaining that the heights of all the persons involved in the original and recreation control their heights in photos. I must say, however, that one thing has always puzzled me. Gordon Arnold was NOT a tall person, but the person in Moorman 5 that I think is Arnold appears to be tall. However, Arnold told Gary Mack that he stood on top of a small mound of dirt. Jack Edited October 16, 2006 by Jack White Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now