David Andrews

Despite comparisons made of LBJ and Shakespeare's Macbeth, it's difficult to believe the assassination came upon Johnson out of a mist.  He may have been visited by three old crones, but sequentially, and they wore narrow neckties.

If one finds BoP-related Cubans in the Lennon affair, it tends to uphold accusations that JL was eliminated in advance of his possible protest of the coming Contra war.  Was the Cabal anticipating that Nicaragua, Honduras and El Salvador would become the Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia of our hemisphere, and that recent citizen Lennon would draw attention to that?

If, I said.  Tends, I qualified.

HOST: I'm Megan Chakravarty.  Today marks the 60th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's assassination in Dallas, Texas, and with every anniversary, we get further and further away from the need to say anything relevant, and, for God's sake, anything new.  Today we will ignore new documentary films and TV series, emerging eyewitness testimony, and anything at all troublesome...

Remember, it was a Harvey-and-Lee thing...

Copyright infringement was all part of the tres riche heures of the 1970s.

9 hours ago, Ron Bulman said:

Strange result when I tried to post Basketball Jones by Cheech and Chong.  No response when clicking on the video, then an odd loud changing buzzing sound, which slowly went away after I clicked out of it.

And remember, consumers... "avoid the Internet forums at all costs. They are a colossal waste of time.

Christian, can your techniques be used to analyze other suspected photo or film alterations?  These come to mind:

• The backyard photos
• Frames of the Z-film that show parts of the rear head wound despite the paint-over
• The LHO image purported to be in a TSBD window (above)

9 hours ago, Cliff Varnell said:

 

I'm reminded of the Stephen King movie The Dead Zone (1983), where only clairvoyant Christopher Walken can see that candidate Martin Sheen is unhinged and power hungry, and as future president will be willing to cut off the JCOS chief's hand to slap it on the palm reader that enables the missile launch.  One of the better SK adaptations, if you're so inclined.

"Do it, general, and go down in history with me.  The people speak through me."

14 hours ago, Cliff Varnell said:

I'm surprised it lasted this long.  Post it directly to the cornfield and few read it.

"This is a bad thread.  This is a very bad thread."

"Wish it into [political discussions] Anthony!"

Let General Zod chew on it in The Phantom Zone.

This is a reach, but whenever I read the Tippit witness describing a gunman with hair squared off behind...Sturgis.

Is it possible Huber saw the right hairline wound, which would have been on Huber's left hand, and transposed the perspective?

11 hours ago, Sean Coleman said:

not really….

 

Just now, David Andrews said:

A through-and-through hole with sunlight shining through?  Does it line up with the dent in the chrome strip?

A through-and-through hole with sunlight shining through?

On the topic of false flag, reminding all that this is the second (?) terror attack on a Moscow theater since 2002, FWIW, and again over territory in dispute.

Sorry to cite wiki, but my eyes aren't open yet this morning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis

Keven, in your "stare of death" detail posted above, with yellow arrow, notice there is almost a straight line of black on the left border of the front wound.  Looks very un-hairlike.  If you look at a full, larger version of the photo, the black covers the parietal area and seems to proceed upward into JFK's crown hair.  That's what I meant by "What's all that black?"

In this fine and valuable post, terms used are a bit fluid among interviewees and the author.  The author makes distinction between use of an optical effect (an inserted traveling matte, not used) and aerial imaging (painting in the forward head wound, skull "flap," and skull explosion).  Rutan, however, cites the forward wound as an "optical" effect.

The forward skull "flap" is rather realistic looking in Zapruder.  Is it possible that the forward wound is actually a filmed image of the rear wound transposed to the right front, through whatever means?  Combination of traveling matte for the "flap" with aerial imaging used to create the skull explosion?

Appearance of a manufactured right front "flap" in the autopsy photos would require taking the time to review the doctored Z-film and replicate the altered frames.

Alternately, what's up with all the black over the parietal area in the "stare of death" photo?  Check full size at link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autopsy_of_John_F._Kennedy

The frontal wound images and records need some further examination.

Good one, Keven.

8 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

When Casolaro dies like that it’s not enough to say that he was led to committing suicide by believing in stories told by hucksters. Maybe Riconosciuto is a huckster, but that proves nothing in regards to Danny Casolaro’s death. I hope Jim, in reviewing this, comes to the conclusion that the documentary didn’t dig deep enough, and questions the hucksters motives, rather than his supposed affect on Danny. The big story is the Octopus. It’s a great representation of what we have been facing for decades. 

If one wanted a warts-and-all analog to Joe Frady, protagonist of The Parallax View...  But let's see what Jim D researches.

And, I agree - someone got too close to the network and paid for it.  It's obvious Riconsciuto spread disinfo...but why did someone have to die if it was a pack of lies?

4 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

I watched it last night and I am doing some research on the case.

As Stu says, this is a complex case because there is a lot of extraneous stuff that was applied to the Inslaw case, much of it by Hamilton and Michael Riconosciuto. The latter's story about the October Surprise seems just simply wrong to me.  And if you can buy it he was also involved with the MJ 12 case.   To call him a "spinner" is maybe giving him too much credit.

I also wonder about the whole Trapdoor angle to Promis.

 

Jim, for a view on the October Surprise, try Prelude to Terror: The Rogue CIA and the Legacy of America's Private Intelligence Network, by Joe Trento.

https://www.amazon.com/Prelude-Terror-Americas-Private-Intelligence/dp/0786714646

2 hours ago, Paul Brancato said:

David - I’ll check out these two videos later, but just wanted to say I appreciate your mention of the Safari Club, and the Shackley/Bush axis, and I wish the film had gone into more depth on the octopus itself. But perhaps the choice was this documentary or none. 

Thank you.  I don't think it's a bad documentary, I just think it should have been sharper on the origin issues you cite.  The doc puts forth that the Octopus was created by a set of named characters (Shackley, Cline, etc. ...but not Paul Helliwell), but not how these characters created Safari Club and the Octopus network.  Along the way they busted out a number of criminally managed US savings and loan companies, causing a financial crisis.  All this is more important to understand than that these characters were machinating before the creation of CIA, an assertion the narrative leans on heavily without saying why it's significant.  We know what's going on, but the general audience might not.  Better to discuss the deeds.

Here's a documentary on Mark Lombardi, a New York artist whose death in March 2000 was ruled a suicide.  Lombardi was attracting attention through creating graphic representations of flow charts showing the movement of money and influence among politicians, intel ops, corporations and banks from the Safari Club/Contra war period forward.  It was a truly modern art, and some critics may have taken up arms against it.

Probably no one else is so undignified as to bring this up, but what separates the Z-film that RB Nichols showed the reporter from the not-so-deepfake that Bill Cooper unwisely pedaled for years?  Nichols' version was faked on film, not video?  If a film fake was circulating as far downstream as Nichols, then someone at some intelligence-friendly film lab was proud enough of their 1963 work to create extreme fakes in order to show off their capabilities, and Nichols and other intel bottom feeders were using the fakes to awe, influence and mislead viewers.

My note on The Octopus Murders: the credibility of Danny Casolaro's research would have been underscored by explaining the Ted Shackley-GHW Bush axis at CIA that created the private, international intelligence network known as the Safari Club to counteract the Jimmy Carter-Stansfield Turner budget and personnel cuts at CIA.  That, and some exploration of how banks like BCCI and Nugan Hand operated as funders of illegal clandestine ops through investments made by several countries' intel services, not just CIA's.  It was the background that enabled and informed the Reagan admin's Contra war in Central America and its flows of arms, supplies, capital and drugs.

Thanks, Robert.

1 minute ago, Sandy Larsen said:

Here's Robert's list:

 

Thanks, Sandy,

6 minutes ago, Joe Bauer said:

In the comparative photos above of Shelley in Dealey Plaza being escorted down to the Dallas PD ( or Sheriffs office?) just minutes after JFK was shot and the one's of a look-alike man standing with Lee Harvey Oswald's New Orleans flyer passing crew in August of 63, I just became aware of the uncanny similarity of the shoes worn by both men.

Same exact style, length, width, color, etc.

Check out each man's right foot shoe. See for yourself. 

And the time frame of the photos was only3 months apart.

You can see Danny Arce's long raincoat in your second pic above.  If Oswald had worn such a thing that day...who would need a curtain rod story?