Chris Davidson

Responses in red.

From Above: Add some contrast to the original frame and the right signpost spreads. Layer the reenactment frame over the contrasted original frame and the rightside signpost is the same size. Where else can we find an occurance of the spread? Extant Z186 The signposts(that's plural) were never going to align from the reenactment to the original. Same reason for not using the correct camera height in the reenactments. We do know that the camera was higher in the reenactment and who was taller, Sitzman/Zapruder or ? Look at the cut frame I created from the reenactment, aligning the sign/curb segment that extends in front of the sign. Notice where the leftside signpost ends up. After that, look at where the bottom edge of that cut frame ends up in relationship to the black line on the original sign, among other quite interesting original sign markings. Down below: Steven, I believe you were interested in horizontal movement. I like the substitute term parallax better. You could almost believe that extant z186 lighting is reminiscent of a start up frame from a different camera/position with all that parallax movement occurring. Betzner takes his photograph at extant z186, previously supplied in the overlay gif with Wiegman. Coincidences!!! Not

Then, referring back to the previous plat, along with the Betzner/Wiegman composite, the physical position of Shaneyfelt is much closer to the following gentleman: So, I'll ask again, who and how many were filming? Keeping in mind, that parallax could be created by either one person moving to different locations or two people within close proximity filming. And, if you still believe the official story, I highly recommend not following this topic any longer.

The red X is approx where the camera person filming Shaneyfelt (in black upon the pedestal) is.

What else might the reenactments reveal in terms of alternative methods used to convince us of the official story?

Chris, Thanks for the adjustment. The signs orientation to the person filming is what I'm most interested in. Here's the copy I am using, resized using 145%W/149%H/2° CW, layered over your corrected version. I don't think it's a coincidence that the bobblehead effect appears on the same side as the Costella post lean.

Steven, That was one idea we tested (that's my 5'9" brother down at the curb) but found he rose up a little above the top of the tires.

Let's match the filmer's orientation from the Barnes photo(via the StemmonsSign)with the extant Z frame. Horizontally flip Barnes, adjust the sign angle since it was flipped and overlay it. I believe that right side, sign post angular movement, is similar to what John Costella discovered many years ago. Don't forget those mounting holes.

Dave Wiegman

What was the official story again?

This was the 2nd time ever filming with a B/H 414. First time, I used one roll for test shooting at home. Didn't move my feet at all, while up on the pedestal, only rotated my torso. That was for all filming segments. https://vimeo.com/800442739

How apropos. Leading us into the next gif:

One way to convert the mounting holes to the opposite side of the same post? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1HrO2W6w-4

Another would be any subtle differences between when the extant Z iteration was filmed and one with a very similar LOS within 1-2 days of Nov22,1963. And being that they are both the left-side StemmonsSign post, as one is from extant Z98, notZ104(sorry about that), I'll leave you to ponder the difference between the two. Once you recognize the difference, then apply that knowledge to help you gain a better understanding of how many ways that difference could have been created. Then, enjoy a happy President's Day.

And, without skipping a beat, the reenactment photo would show us the alignment objects that were used to perfect the extant Zfilm. If you really want to exact that left-side post position, just take a look at where the extant zframe signpost-top snugly fits into the alignment marker on the reenactment(hence the contrast added). One other alignment object on the leftside would be the curved white line(starting where the red line ends) on the reenactment photo. Signifying where the top edge of the sign would be and the post location in the extant zfilm. I think that's good for now. But, moving forward later: There are a few simple solutions to the signs orientation difference, when viewed from the filmer's location, among both frames. One is as easy as looking in a mirror, as you watch the sign teeter-totter in the gif.

Reenactments are fine when the aim is for truth seeking, not deception. Moving to the left side, let's align JFK (using the extant 207 splice frame) with the signpost from the reenactment of Dec2-5, by the SS I believe. Notice the offset between the two left-side posts and where the splice frame 207 post lands, if we were to attach it to the reenactment frame. Look at Costella's example in the previous post for the same concept.

Credit to John Costella for the following: There's more to come, but hopefully you understand the significance of what is being shown here. In fact, if you take a closer look at the gif, you might be able to see the signpost remnants iteration.

George, You don't need much math with this, just perceptive observation as with your previous comments. A solid sign can't move independent of itself(or segments thereof) no matter how many ways you film it.

Speaking of that lower sprockethole. This next gif should help you conceptualize the sleight of hand. What part of the StemmonsSign is in unison with the Bobbleheads? Give your eyes a few seconds for adjusting to see its true movement.

A vertical comparison using the difference between the so called damaged z207 frame and the Shaneyfelt height factor.

The parked limo on the rightside is supposed to represent the location of JFK when the magic bullet struck. The two red parallel lines represent both the WC(dots) and Robert West(+ sign)physical location for JFK. As the plotted position of JFK according to the WC at z222, flashes, is the parked limo more reflective of the dot positioning by the WC or the + positioning of Robert West?

And, since Newcomb/Perry arrived at frames missing where the WC melded two shots, one being a 10.2ft adjustment behind the StemmonsSign, while the tire chalking photo supports the reduced speed and/or limo stop as the plat plots a leftward moving limo behind the sign, it's no wonder Brehm might have conflated the events just a slight bit with regards to when the limo traveled 10-12ft. The last time I checked, 10.2ft would be between that estimation. Charles Brehm (on south side of Elm Street, close to the President at the start of the shooting), November 24, 1963: “Brehm expressed his opinion that between the first and third shots, the President’s car only seemed to move some 10 or 12 feet. It seemed to him that the automobile almost came to a halt after the first shot, but of this he is not certain.” [FBI re­ port: CE1425: 22H837] In case you forgot, ballistically, JFK within the limo has to be in the correct physical location for the SBT magical mystery tour to succeed.

The area that needed fixing was the StemmonsSign, etc. Why? " DPD James Chaney (one of the four Presidential motorcyclists)---stated that the Presidential limousine stopped momentarily after the first shot (according to the testimony of Mark Lane; corroborated by the testimony of fellow DPD motorycle officer Marion Baker: Chaney told him that "…at the time, after the shooting, from the time the first shot rang out, the car stopped completely, pulled to the left and stopped." TSBD Supervisor Roy Truly---after the first shot "…I saw the President's car swerve to the left and stop(Extant Z135?) somewhere down in the area…[it stopped] for a second or two or something like that…I just saw it stop." [3 H 221, 266]; Dallas Morning News reporter Mary Woodward (Pillsworth)---"…Instead of speeding up the car, the car came to a halt."; she saw the President's car come to a halt after the first shot. "DPD D.V. Harkness---". . . I saw the first shot and the President's car slow[ed] down to almost a stop…I heard the first shot and saw the President's car almost come to a stop and some of the agents [were] piling on the car." [6 H 309];

After you listen to Dino for less than a minute, imagine on the plat above where the limo started veering leftward. https://vimeo.com/797251262

Copied from the last entry in the previous post pertaining to the tire chalk marks: "My guess would be, since one full tire rotation equals 7.4ft and z207 is halfway between z222/240 while CE884 lists the z207-222 span at 14.8ft traveled which is exactly twice the 7.4ft rotation amount, the speed from z207-z222 according to the chalk marks would be: 18/15 = 1.2x 7.4ft = 8.88ft per sec / 1.47 = 6.04mph" Newcomb/Perry expanded below, from the quote in red above by .0057 The difference between .48ft per frame and .4857ft per frame 10.2ft/21frames = .4857ft per frame x 18.3fps = 8.888ft per sec /1.47 = 6.046mph That's a match between chalked tire and Newcomb/Perry.