Chris Davidson

The proper name:

I believe Bell/Hughes along with Altgens shows that as the left arm of a human being:

Two different people with the same colored red clothing in two different films, seconds apart. One is supposed to be Lovelady, who might the other be? Is that red or reddish/brown or whatever shade of effing red you want it to be?

Response to Alan's previous posting: I believe that's the extended shadow from the woman(left side of the mailbox) running towards the steps/building. Another point being that when some videos are stabilized, even using inferior quality material, sometimes events become a little clearer. So those that question these methods might want to take that aspect into consideration. Added on edit: The object you point out could be part of a stationary shadow from the woman in white ahead of the running woman.

Yet when scaled:

Bookending body angles within the same photo:

Comparisons within the same photo. Should Lovelady be head and shoulders above the rest?

Remember, It's Hughes, Towner, Bell, Altgens then Wiegman.

Alan, Welcome. On a smaller scale with a little contrast added, albeit a little clearer:

Applying Andrej's model to both figures:

What is the angle difference between the two faces in relationship to Altgens and does the angled difference dictate that Lovelady's chin/cheek/jaw line should block out more of the white(shirt)area than it is, just as she does.

Shadow contrast applied:

I would expect something closer to this with no overlap:

Complete chin/jaw line should appear. Different ways of looking at the arm orientation. Which one matches more closely with what is seen in Bell? Credit to Jean Ceulemans (I believe), for the post activity TSBD photo.

My Martin/police station gif shows the same person. If Sandy believes differently, I disagree with him. That's as much as you should read into that statement. btw, both those videos show the pocket too.

Yes. The same person in Martin and the police station video. But that's not what I was indicating with the Bell frame. The Bell frame supports what I quoted you on.

Previously identified:

It doesn't matter what Altgens version you use. The family on the left might show you what is wrong with the figure in the circle.

Universally Lightened: https://vimeo.com/874304340?share=copy

The same as we see in Hughes:

Perhaps the picture you saw included one of the two red clothed individuals we see here? https://vimeo.com/870842433?share=copy

Try it on another frame from a different source. Is there some-one there?

Yes David, That document was around long before I located "J" in Wiegman. Except no-one knew about this document afaik(made it public), until Bart gained access to Blunt's collection and revealed it many years after 2007.