-
Posts
4,346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Chris Davidson
-
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Were there prospective suspects that fit the location? -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
If you missed the laser dot, I put a red box around it. The Google view should help with orientation. Does that look close to 5.54ft above the 2nd floor window ledge? -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
5.54ft = Rifle barrel end above 2nd floor window sill. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lLlmgPGz97j-x-FoxxtWD3mfSatDPywA/view?usp=sharing -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I arrived at the 30ft height this way: Elev. of Dal-Tex building base = 430.8ft (430.2 + .3 (SniperNest to TSBD Corner) + .3 (TSBD Corner to Dal-Tex) Drommer converted back to West: 430.2 - 100.4 = 329.8 + 161.1 = 490.9 2nd floor window sill = 20ft = (approx height of the TSBD 2nd floor) Elev 450.8 - 423.07(shot#1-SS/FBI Dec-1963 plat) = 27.73ft - 3.27ft(CE884 elev difference) = 24.46ft. 30 - 24.46 = 5.54ft = Rifle barrel end above 2nd floor window sill. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
1" = 10ft Base measurement match: See previous post. The LOS from elev. 423.07 = Shot #1 labeled on the SS/FBI Dec-1963 plat. Richard Sprague used z226 back to the Dal-Tex building as his LOS, I just shortened it to elev 423.07(approx z218) and ran his LOS back to the Dal-Tex. It intersects approx 30ft from the Dal-Tex corner. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Height and angle. Distance next. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
-
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Next, refer back to these two posts: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22692-swan-song-math-rules/?do=findComment&comment=405207 http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22692-swan-song-math-rules/?do=findComment&comment=390993 1.625" - 1.18" = .445" back hole higher than throat hole. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Ray, That's fine. I'll just continue on, to where a/the back shot came from. Mr. SIMMONS. Yes; we did. We placed three targets, which were head and shoulder silhouettes, at distances of 175 feet, 240 feet, and 265 feet, and these distances are slant ranges from the window ledge of a tower which is about 30 feet high. We used three firers in an attempt to obtain hits on all three targets within as short a time interval as possible. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
-
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Button the shirt, along with what's in the red square. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Did you happen to run .43" through a run/rise calc at 7"? Then deduct 3.13° for the reverse Elm St slope. 3.52° - 3.13° = .39° = 0deg 23.4minutes And, match it back to a CE884 frame # from the bridge handrail(overpass). z210-z222 = 2/12 = .1666min per frame 1.4min/ .1666min per frame = 8.4 frames z210 + 8.4 frames = z218.4 -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
The inch designed building blocks the WC used were: .875 + 2.665 = 3.54 + 10 + 39.24 = 52.78" = JFK's stated/testimony head height above the street while seated in the limo. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Where does 20deg50.4min align to on CE884? It lies between z210-z222. 12 frames with a difference of (1°11' = 71minutes) between them. 71min/12frames = 5.91min per frame 20deg50.4min - 20°23min (z222) = 27.4min 27.4min/5.91min per frame = 4.63 frames z222= 4.63 = z217.37 First shot determination from SS/FBI- Dec/1963 plat = Station# 381.3 Station# z222 = 385.9 385.9 - 381.3 = 4.6ft Limo speed z210-z222 = 12.5ft per 12 frames = 1.04ft per frame 4.6ft / 1.04ft per frame = 4.42 frames z222 - 4.42 frames = z 217.58 -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Once that was taken into account, the real difference of throat hole higher than back hole of .43" could be deducted from the 2.665" back hole above throat hole measurement. -.43" + 2.665" = 2.235" back hole above throat hole. As you can see, quite close to the simplified equation of 5.75 - 3.54 = 2.21" 2.235" rise through a 7" neck/throat run = 17.71° + 3.13° (Elm St slope) = 20.84° = 20deg50.4min -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I mentioned that if you were only interested in the abbreviated version to use 3.54" as the upward adjustment. I didn't inform you that the adjustment should start from a position that is .875" lower than it should be. -.875" + 3.54" = 2.665" back above throat. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Before the incline, the back hole was .75" above the throat hole. After the incline, the back hole is below the throat hole by .75 - 1.18 = -.43" -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
There was a seat incline on which JFK sat. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22692-swan-song-math-rules/?do=findComment&comment=390945 http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/22692-swan-song-math-rules/?do=findComment&comment=390993 -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
The contradiction is a difference of .875” lower on the back. Imo See if this is close as I progress. Subtract that from my original back height mark of 61.75” 61.75 - .875 = 60.875” above the ground 60.875” (back) - 60.125” (throat) = .75” (back above throat). -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
The longer explanation: I encourage you to try this on your own. These are my results as I am the same height 72.5” as JFK was. My wife took the measurements. Stand up straight. Find a dress shirt with a 1.5” collar measured from the back of the neck. Button it up. Measure down from the collar top 5.75” and mark it on a piece of tape that sticks to the shirt. Put the shirt on and button it up. Measure from ground to mark. Distance from ground = 61.75” Measure to the top button center and subtract .875” and mark it on a piece of tape that sticks to the shirt. Distance from ground = 60.125” 61.75 - 60.125 = 1.625” Remove shirt, button it up and suspend it by pulling out on the shoulder areas to get it level and square. Have a helper take their index fingers and press through the front/back of the shirt using the tape marks. My marks become the same height. Note the contradiction with the gif. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
If you are not interested in the forthcoming(more exact) explanation, but want the abbreviated version(gets you quite close) do this: Use the 5.75" measurement down from the collar top, from there, move that mark up 3.54" take that difference of 2.21" and run it through a "run/rise" calculator using a torso of 7". Add (3.13° - Elm St. slope) and match that angle to a CE884 frame number. -
Swan-Song -- Math Rules
Chris Davidson replied to Chris Davidson's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Description (and of course, some math) to follow: -
Conspiracy theories a threat.
Chris Davidson replied to Cory Santos's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Directly from the "Setup a Shell Corporation" playbook. The scenario sounds a lot like a president who had his lawyer hide illegal payments to his mistresses. Remember the "unindicted co-conspirator". Instead we have Indyke (Epstein's attorney for decades) working his magic: "Epstein only served 13 months in the Palm Beach County Stockade, where he occupied a private wing and had liberal work-release privileges of 12 hours per day, six days per week. Indyke's signature appears on the work release program agreement as Epstein's employer, according to the document reviewed by Yahoo Finance. Further requests for documents, including the required letter of employment specified as part of the work release agreement, were denied because of an active criminal investigation. For his work-release, Epstein worked at The Florida Science Foundation, his not-for-profit that said it aimed to “to finance scientific research on academic, organizational and individual levels,” according to the organization’s articles of incorporation. Records show that Indyke registered The Florida Science Foundation in November 2007, just after he signed the non-prosecution agreement. Epstein paid the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office $128,000 between 2008 and 2009 through The Florida Science Foundation, according to WPTV 5, citing public records. Yahoo Finance’s request for those documents was unsuccessful. A spokeswoman for the sheriff’s office said they were part of an “active and ongoing criminal [and] internal investigation.” The Florida Science Foundation dissolved on September 25, 2009, after failing to file an annual report, records show. While Epstein spent 13 months in the Palm Beach county stockade, Indyke made at least 38 visits to see him, according to a jail log. According to a 2010 deposition of Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoski, he believes it was Indyke who called him on the phone, saying Epstein wanted him to visit the county jail. Indeed, Visoski made many visits shortly after Epstein began his county jail sentence." No conspiring what-so-ever, all in a days work. -
Conspiracy theories a threat.
Chris Davidson replied to Cory Santos's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29501860-new-world-order More content here. Scroll through it, if interested. https://books.google.com/books?id=zsNJDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT15&lpg=PT15&dq=allen+dulles+quote+nobody+reads&source=bl&ots=Wd4Q6gsSsS&sig=ACfU3U1fWC2cQRv0BN-Z06d_ke-YCCBY2w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAm7nTvfbjAhXBvp4KHe58B8kQ6AEwGnoECAwQAQ#v=onepage&q=allen dulles quote nobody reads&f=false -
Conspiracy theories a threat.
Chris Davidson replied to Cory Santos's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
An excerpt from the playbook: