Larry Hancock

Paul, a small correction, in my scenario Ruby was necessary only for local intelligence on the city, on the DPD and who was who in Dallas. I would never place him as the point man for the tactical operation itself. He was simply someone whose services could be bought through the correct cut outs and who would be handy for minor local tasks that might come up, ...in other words, a gopher but a gopher who knew people in some interesting places such as DPD As you know from SWHT, I discuss the fact that his role changed dramatically on the afternoon of Nov. 22, suggesting that he was actually one of the very few controllable resources immediately available in Dallas after Oswald was taken into custody. -- Larry

I'm glad you enjoyed it Paul, I suppose about the only comment I'd add is that if you complete the rest of the book, you will see that the Artime/Amworld project was probably not the most intense covert regime change project in the nation's history, certainly Chile, Nicaragua, and others come to mind. All in all it was probably equal to the effort in Angola. But that's a much longer and larger story. In addition, far more money, energy and casualties were devoted to other covert projects....Tibet and Laos are examples in Indochina. I also need to note that much of chapter 12 comes courtesy of primary research by Gary Murr and he definitely deserves the credit for opening the door on AMWORLD to an extent that no other researcher or historian has done to date, all based on release of operational documents.. There remains a huge amount of un-mined information in those documents - Gary and Bill Simpich are among only a handful of people doing work on that raw historical data.

David, two obvious choices....the pick up that "stalled" near the overpass and was towed away only a bit before the motorcade arrived....and a series of cars and light trucks pulled off the access ramp to Stemmons freeway and immediately following the approach. All would be fine candidates, the pick up the best. However given that both the trade center and parkland may have been back ups, cars parked close enough to the road at the approaches to either would work.

Paul, I think a point in the early time frame of the Cuba project that is important to mention is that the Castro assassination was first proposed by J.C. King and endorsed - albeit reworded - by Dulles who passed it on up the chain of command. Given that Ike approved the Cuba project and that Ike had previously told Dulles to eliminate Luemumba, I can't help but think that it was assumed he intended a similar option for Castro. With all the debate over JFK approving an assassination, everyone seems to forget the actual proposal and endorsement occurred before JFK took office.

The following would probably be useful in evaluating Keith Gilbert's associations... http://greatwhitedesert.org/dir/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler_Was_Elijah

Good deal Paul, one of the areas to watch is specifically the differences in operational skills between many of the familiar names that we toss about all the time. Its true that Hunt, Phillips, Morales and Robertson were all in the Directorate of Plans, the clandestine operations service. But the P-P group ranged from political action types (like Hunt) through the psych warfare and propaganda specialist like Phillips to the people like Phillips and Morales who wore multiple hats like counter intelligence and on to the real paramilitary operations guys, trainers and managers like Morales and pure field action officers like Robertson who worked though surrogates and bonded closely with them. We really do gloss over matters if we broadly credit these folks with the same skills ..and indeed the same sorts of contacts and even reputations.... Larry

Paul, the existence of a CIA depot in San Antonio has been known for some time; we write about a few such in SW. Normally they are relatively small depot areas of much larger Army depots, dating back to WWII. The AK-47's are no surprise because the CIA uses them to store "deniable" weapons purchased in the world arms markets...you don't send American military weapons into deniable operations (well only when you are as stupid as say the BOP affair). More details often emerge from either former personnel or even though environmental impact studies. In one known operation from the San Antonio depot, three jet transport Starlifter flights carried the initial deniable arms shipments directly to Kenshasha, Zaire to support the Angola operation initiated by Henry Kissinger. You will find more detail on the depot at the link below: http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/midwest.pdf

Paul, I suggest you also read chapters 6 and 7 as that will introduce some familiar names and give you some important history that carried over to the Cuba project. You will also want to read the Autonomous and Deniable chapter which carries through to the final phase of the anti-Castro effort in 63/64. -- Larry

Paul, I think you will be surprised, in later administrations, to what extent the Secretary of State, individual national security advisers and in some instances political associates have a major influence in the presidents decisions. We illustrate many instances in covert ops where such individuals totally overrode both CIA and military positions. Of course I am a firm believer in Deep Politics and the extent to which power brokers shape things...many times you cannot totally connect those dots, sometimes you can make a stab at it. Readers will be surprised at the apparent influence held by JC King, during both the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations - he was the first to propose killing Castro, at a point when both Eisenhower and Dulles had no particular opinion. We go on to show King's close association with certain corporate leaders and the influence they had on him. It would be foolish to think there are not power brokers, that's the nature of politics hence a major factor in "governance". However often they are easy to flush out simply by following the relationship between certain activities and profit impact. In any event I won't belabor the point here but in 600 pages I think we do a pretty good job of documenting the obvious "influences" in each administration, who most definitely what I had assumed when I began the research. And everyone can add there own preferred amount of conspiracy to that - sort of like sprinkles...grin. Stu and I just restricted ourselves to the layers the historical record reveals, certainly that is not the whole picture - but its a darn big one even at that. Larry

Paul, the entire decision making process and who initiated and drove what covert operations are the subject of the some 600 pages in Shadow Warfare; it also traces the evolution of the CIA's influence. The book covers the period from 1940 to 2013; it is a deep book and not necessarily an easy read and I suspect it will not be nearly conspiratorial enough for some - on the other hand, if you want the aspects which can be documented and which are factual, it would be a good tutorial for the questions you raise in your post. For that matter, it also addresses the legal context of covert operations, based in the National Security act of 1947, again a complex topic but one that explains why many of today's current military operations against jihadi terrorism are conducted under that legal code rather than the military code - especially given that Congress has consistently refused to actually declare a state of war, greatly complicating the legal context of all such operations from 2001 to the present. -- Larry

I don't know Bill, its written to say that "she" (Miss Garner) saw the policeman and Truly run up the stairs. Does that mean she saw them run by her on the fourth floor as she was standing there? Did she really just wait their by the stairs all the time it took for the women to go downstairs, for Truly and the policeman to come upstairs, stop to encounter Oswald on the second floor, question him and then start up the stairs again. upstairs...did she see the other person Truly mentioned seeing. It certainly raises a number of questions for me...did she speak to Truly? What about seeing other people on the stairs if she was she stayed by the steps, there were no doors on the stairway, wonder who else ran by? Seems like a very interesting witness who should have been asked a few more questions...or was she, just not familiar with her...... Larry

Robin, am I reading this incorrectly or is Miss Garner saying that she went upstairs along with Truly and the policeman? That would be something a bit new? -- Larry

Paul, I was not challenging anything, I was simply providing information on de Torres for your reference since it had come up in discussion on the thread. I'll cease doing that from this point on. You clearly have a path you wish to follow and I have no wish to divert you from it.

Paul, you could only disqualify de Torres if you believed his remark about knowing Odio in Cuba. Most likely, if he did go to Dallas that would have been a lie to cover up his motive. If you look into it further you find that there would have been an immense social gulf between his family and hers. Also, de Torres is the real deal, you can find him present on exile boat missions and with true contacts to the real operation players in the exile community. Basically he was he read deal as compared to Hall who was nothing but a talker... Heck Hall was so general mistrusted that the John Birch society guys in California made him take a polygraph before they would even let him address their group. On the other hand de Torres had truly deep connections and appeared to have been widely trusted by the most activist groups ranging from Commandos L to Alpha 66....

Paul, you might wish to follow up with Joan Mellon's book, I don't recall the details but what I do recall is at some point either Murgado or de Torres said that de Torres had gone to Dallas, in fact it went much further than that with de Torres claiming he had known Sylvia Odio in Cuba and was interested in looking her up again and possibly dating her... I'm offering no opinion on that but there certainly has been discussion of de Torres in Dallas and visiting Odio. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKtorres.htm

Be nice Robert, in this instance the lady was the victim of a very bad choice of angles by the photographer. Sort of goes to prove just because somebody is taking pictures they are not necessarily giving good advice to their subject....probably an important point to remember in today's era of phone cameras...

Once again, proof that nothing ever goes away on the internet.....this photo comes up over and over again every few years. I recall discussing it with everyone from Jack White to David Lifton over more than a decade. The basics are that it was part of a series of photos taken during a Dulles visit to the ranch for a VP briefing before the JFK/LBJ election. The series was done by a photojournalist who happened to get in and do this shot as well as a series of others including one very unflattering one of Ladybird seating herself on a horse. Johnson was livid and booted the guy off the ranch, During one Lancer conference we saw the whole set which had been obtained from a theater owner in Kansas City. Some of the photos were sold as stock photos and actually the one in the paper ended up being used to illustrate VIP visits to Johnson's ranch in an article about the Texas trip and the upcoming visit to the ranch by Jack and Jackie. -- clearly I've been involved with this subject way too long ....grin, Larry

After looking at Hines remarks for some time I came to the same conclusion as Robert. The fact that the lights on the phone went off indicates that those extensions went back on hook - most likely the people that were on the extensions cut their calls short to be ready for the motorcade. -- Larry

Pat, that's a great find, totally unknown to me. Certainly it does seem to substantiate that some staff including Warren understood that they were on a mission rather than doing an investigation. What jumped into my mind though was who is he talking about that the Commission expects to publish simultaneously, what material were they given in advance and in confidence and since he uses the word "critics", who was being spoon fed to appear as a critic when apparently they were actually being anything but... -- Larry

Vince, that's not how history or research works....handed him by someone in the Plaza, come on now. I'm not going to get into the fray here, Pat and David can carry on but certainly somebody needs to work on finding out if there is a history for that document.

Paul, if you are referring to my publishing my research on Walker...I did not. I researched a great number of leads and individuals whom I ultimately determined were not relevant to the attack in Dallas. You will find lots of familiar names missing from what I've written. A good amount of the research on the ultra right did make it into AGOG but that was in regard to a different crime and Walker was not included there either. That focused on the Swift network, the NSRP and peripheral groups such as the Minutemen and the WKKK. I did pick up a lot of varied information on Walker from sources in Dallas, including certain things on his personal life and habits that I don't feel compelled to share either. You won't find Walker in my works, you won't find James Files or Howard Burris or the ultra right talk show host from the Pacific Northwest (whom I spent a huge amount of time on and Garrison called as a witness), or the witness/radio man from Oklahoma who ended up in a mental institution (whom I also spent much time on and Garrison called as a witness) - you would won't even find H.W. Bush or a number of other figures that appear frequently elsewhere and whom other researchers find compelling. Their absence simply reflects my analysis. Actually if you look in the preface and introduction I give some of my selection criteria but that's about the size of it. -- Larry

Paul, I think it was in the same social crowd all along, call it the Georgetown Set, call it the Eastern Establishment...what you will. All devoutly anti-Communist and anti-Socialist and firmly capitalist. My reference was to the former CIA types like Ed Wilson and others who Shackley became entangled with, you don't go from his position into into consulting in international arms transfers, and a lot of related activities without exposing yourself and Shackley had never been a great judge of character. We cover those sorts of associations in a couple of chapters. As to protecting the cartel, I go into exactly how that happened, involving an understanding between the CIA Director and the Attorney General, its part of our overall exploration of drug and arms smuggling in and around shadow warfare. But I'll stop hyping that here, if you read it you'll see what I mean but its a 600 page book and a few posts here and there can't really get across the story.

Well all I can say is that I did my best to sort out Shackley though his entire career in Shadow Warfare.....if you want to look at what was probably the two worst phases of his total career you should look at his stint in Laos and his total abandonment of the Hmong.....not to mention his totally stupid move to put pressure on the North Vietnamese by setting up a base right on their western border, that got a lot of Laotians killed. Beyond that his negligence during the Phoenix program in Vietnam and then there was his gutting of the DEA informant program in Latin America. I can't totally blame Condor on him but he and Phillips along with Morales shared a lot of guild for what followed in the death squads there. The amazing thing is that someone with as many failed operations could be promoted so consistently.....given his track record its not all that surprising he would fall in with a bad crowd after retirement... -- Larry

Tommy, I see I didn't put this in the Odio revisited chapter and its just a recollection but I seem to recall that Hemming himself went to the FBI about his rifle and suggested it might have been taken out of hock and used for the assassination, my impression at the time was that either he or Howard were really trying to make trouble for Hall and get him off their backs and away from their donors. I wish I had written this up but you might want to do some searches on Hemming's correspondence and chats with the FBI, he did that quite frequently. It would at least be a place to start...

The answer to that is easy Paul, Hall was known to make all sorts of claims to enhance his own reputation, such as being on close personal terms with Santo Trafficante. He was simply a braggart and switched stories as opportunity allowed. That was one of the reasons nobody trusted him even then....you should have heard the claims he made after his meth arrest - being a secret govt agent, friends in Washington, friends in the CIA, better not cross him, he'd be out as soon as they found out. Bottom line, he made a life long practice of bragging to enhance his rep...but only when it didn't put him at any direct risk. And for that matter, I'm not sure that any of the guys he was associating with would have called him a friend per se. From my studies they tolerated him at best, and he hung out with them to scope out opportunities to pick up donations or new leads to folks with at least some money.