Michael Cross

Probably. Multiple properties from one sale that was probably purchased with insurance money. She was probably an amazing investor, a savant. She probably had a print press in each of her multiple homes for counterfeiting. She probably robbed several banks. Probably.

I wonder when it was last shown. The white whale.

No. No they don't. And they aren't sufficient to explain the real estate holdings.

It's easy to make things up too Tracy. Claiming she bought real estate by selling real estate is a circular and empty argument. It has no merit. She was able to own real estate as you say. HOW? She ran a con? Show proof.

Yes, again, vacuous and now circular thought from Parnell. Empty.

That may be the most vacuous thing I've ever read. The question is not did she profit from real estate, it is how did she BUY real estate. By "running a con" on everyone? Please. What's your source, as you don't give us any documentation.

Yes, thanks for making my point.

This topic is the most infuriating bit of the research. Those like Bernie and Parnell that simply won't look are discarding tons of credible evidence that there was something odd, at a minimum, going on with Lee Harvey Oswald. He, again, at a minimum, was NOT who the government said he was. You don't have to buy in on the Oswald Project hook line and sinker. I'm an agnostic on Harvey and Lee. But FFS, SOMETHING was going on, he was being impersonated, there are far too many contradictory records to be explained away as clerical errors. The photo showing LHO with a missing tooth above, if you won't even LOOK at that how serious can you be about finding the truth? Give up your pet positions people.

So SHOW us. Quit talking out your arse and post your proof. Or shut up.

Asserting that without offering specifics as to the PROPER interpretation is either intellectual laziness or purposeful disinformation.

The guy at 6:25 is interesting. Something about the way he moves, his gesture, reminds me of Oswald. Hair does look too long in back, or is ruffled from leaning against the wall in the doorway . . .

Sunny day. Possibly sunglasses.

Nor do you know that he wasn't in his right mind. Such vacuous assertions can be used in either direction, and in both have no validity.

And seems to be more than a WC apologist; he's being purposefully obtuse.

That's what I love about Mr. Josephs: When he makes an argument he offers supporting evidence, and does so brilliantly.

So, here I follow the math, and the implication. My understanding supported by David's explanation and brilliant use of visuals. Thanks gentlemen.

Indeed.

I'd guess it's Lovelady in all of the photos/movies in question. However, much about this case is not as it seems. Forget that at our collective peril.

Fascinating to watch this debate. Robert is trying to find empirical evidence about height while others say opinion and appearance are enough. What's wrong with fact based data? It can only add to the investigation IMO.

Thanks, and Jesus Christ. These folks aren't worried about decorum, practically celebrating the assassination. "This JFK EXPERIENCE tour is all about the JFK assassination, we take you back in time to relive a minute by minute journey of what happened on November 22nd , 1963. On this tour you will enter Oswald's rooming house were you will get to ask questions and get answers from a once 11 year old girl that actually knew Lee Harvey Oswald. Pat Hall is now all grown up and owns the home left to her by her grand mother Gladys Johnson. " And check out the limo tour (this thing could be a valuable reference car): http://www.dallascitytour.com/jfk-limo-tour-1.html

Oswald's head looks over-sized now that he's standing with others. Blowing this up, his head is a tad big, but I'd guess within reason for humans (perhaps not for Oswald's actual head in proportion). But that CHIN is VERY wide. What do you know about this photo Robert?

For Sandy "Eagle Eye" Larsen and Robert "Hawk Eye" Prudhomme: You can see the whole photograph here: http://nypost.com/20...ame-since-1963/ -- Tommy "To me it looks like the sling is pulled through the bottom sling mount (a hoop), and then (presumably) attached to the side mount. There ARE Carcano mounts that include both the bottom and side hoops." -- Sandy Larsen Do you mean like this "dual-position rear barrel band," Sandy? Did they make them for the 91/38 Shot Rifle? (IDK) http://www.ebay.com/itm/Italian-Carcano-dual-position-Rear-Barrel-Band-carbine-91-24-etc-no-screw-/331952097686?hash=item4d49e30996:g:9SIAAOSwzJ5XXxbw [edit] Sandy, FWIW, I'm starting to agree with you that the "rear barrel band" on the rifle in the BY photos had both a bottom (pivoting) loop and a side (stationary) slot for the sling to go through, and that "LHO's" sling went through both of them. So unless someone changed that "rear barrel band" to the more conventional side-only loop type after the BY photos were taken, this proves that .... well, something was rotten in the state of Texas. -- Tommy God I wish I had photoshop at work so I could illustrate this, but in order to rotate the rifle above enough to view that side mount for the sling on the bottom as in the BYPs, The top sight would be rotated to an extent that it would either not be visible or be a tiny bump in the BYPs. You've got a bottom mount in the BYP and a side mount above.

You can go back in time with Google earth. Here's a 2012 shot of the gate/fence before the new corner building was erected: https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7506862,-96.825624,3a,37.5y,235.32h,91.81t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1smIro4skQXaVrjvdeko95kQ!2e0!5s20121201T000000!7i13312!8i6656 <iframe src="https://www.google.com/maps/embed?pb=!1m0!3m2!1sen!2sus!4v1473354793066!6m8!1m7!1sGkSBBKGbAudP6j9w1YcdJw!2m2!1d32.750686251203!2d-96.82550636096838!3f242.23587332046756!4f-2.764399562492599!5f3.325193203789971"width="600" height="450" frameborder="0" style="border:0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I concur. The yellow house pictured is 214 Neely, clearly visible on Google Earth, and that sure appears to be the back of the gate and fence in the photos.