Jump to content
The Education Forum

Joe Bauer

Members
  • Posts

    6,415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Joe Bauer

  1. On 1/8/2023 at 9:28 AM, W. Niederhut said:

    Joe,

         I think I have a basic outline for the Shakespearean drama.  This could be the best dramatic concept we've come up with here on the Education Forum since David Andrews and I were planning a James Bond sequel called, Trumpfinger, a few years ago.

        This could be a tragedy, history, or comedy, depending on the ending.  If there is a suicide or a stabbing, it will, obviously, end in tragedy.

     The Tragedy (comedy, history, etc.) of Charles III

    Dramatis personae:

    King Charles, a cuckold

    Harry Hotspur, Duke of Sussex, a bastard

    Meaghan, Duchess of Sussex, a moor

    William, Prince of Wales

    Kate, Princess of Wales

    The ghost of Diana, former Princess of Wales

    James Hewitt, a captain of the King's Horse Guards

    Dodi Fayed, an Arabian prince

    Camilla of Rottweiler, the King's consort

    Sir Elton John, court composer

    WHO WOULD YOUR COURT JESTER BE?

    AND WHERE DOES FERGIE FIGURE IN THIS PLAY?

    DODI AS AN ARABIAN PRINCE?

    MORE LIKE INDULGED SPOILED SON OF AN ARABIAN MONEY MERCHANT.

    HOW ABOUT RANDY ANDY AND HIS YOUNG GIRL PROVIDING PIMPS JEFFERY EPSTEIN AND GHISLANE MAXWELL?

    SERIOUSLY, I GENERALLY LOVE THE BRITISH AND THEIR MORAL CHARACTER.

    IF THEY LOVE THEIR MONARCHY, MORE POWER TO THEM.

    I HAPPEN TO BE BORN OF THE POPULIST ANTI-ROYALTY AMERICAN SPIRIT.

    JFK AND JACKIE WERE THE CLOSEST TO ROYALTY AFFECTION I EVER FELT.

    NO DISRESPECT INTENDED BUT AS A LOWER INCOME CLASS KID GROWING UP IN AMERICA AND THE SAME AGE AS CHARLES, HE ALWAYS LOOKED TO ME " EXACTLY" LIKE THE "WHAT ME WORRY?" STUPID LOOK CHARACTER IN MAD MAGAZINE.

    THAT IMAGE SIMILARITY SO STRONGLY INFLUENCED MY OVER-ALL PERCEPTION OF THE ROYAL FAMILY I JUST COULD NOT TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY.

    WHEN DIANA SPENCER ENTERED THE ROYAL FAMILY PICTURE HOWEVER, IT WAS THE FIRST TIME I LOOKED AT THEM DIFFERENTLY. SHE WAS SO STUNNINGLY BEAUTIFUL I THOUGHT "HEY NOW...THAT FAMILY WAS JUST IMPROVED OVERNIGHT!"

    SHE HAD MOVIE STAR LOOKS AND CLASSY UPBRINGING HERSELF. IN FACT, I WAS IN SMITTEN FANTASY LOVE WITH HER MYSELF AS I AM SURE MILLIONS OF OTHER MEN AROUND THE WORLD WERE AS WELL.

    I HAVE ALWAYS FELT KIND OF SORRY FOR CHARLES.

    POOR GUY.

    HE HAD THE BEAUTIFUL YOUNG AND COMPLIANT DIANA IN HIS WORLD FOR A SHORT AND SWEET TIME, YET SHE GREW TO BE TOO MAN LOVING HOT AND INDEPENDENT FOR HIM TO HANDLE.

    HE WAS LEFT WITH ... WELL, YOU KNOW.

    THERE IS SOMETHING SAD ABOUT THAT ENTIRE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY. 

    I DO FEEL THAT THEIR FUTURE WILL BE MUCH MORE POPULAR AND ADMIRED HOWEVER WHEN WILLIAM BECOMES KING. WILLIAM AND HIS WIFE KATE HAVE A LOT MORE GOING FOR THEM ... IMO ANYWAYS.

     

     

     

     

     

  2. 1 hour ago, W. Niederhut said:

    Harry must be annoying a lot of people in the U.K. by airing the family's dirty laundry in public.  It's tacky.

    As for Harry's paternity, the official biographies are claiming that James Hewitt didn't get involved with Princess Diana until 1986, but I read somewhere recently that they met more than a year prior to Harry's birth.

    Now I can't find that article, but I know that I wasn't hallucinating when I read it.

    Harry sure looks like Hewitt imo.

  3. 16 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

    IMHO, this memo appears to confirm that Nagell was likely "intermittently" employed as an informant for the CIA from August 1962 through October of 1963. 

    I admire the research done to unearth this memo.

    I am not sure who was Hench, or who he worked for, from this memo. 

    Also, would the CIA divulge sources and methods to Hench, if Hench was not CIA? 

     

     

     

    Amazing document research effort.

    Incredibly thought provoking.

    If Nagel had "any" contact with LHO at any time, he should not be dismissed as totally or even marginally irrelevant from what we see here in this document alone.

    IMO anyways.

     

  4. 13 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:

    It's offensive to me that anyone would even try to portray Babbit's killing as the most tragic and unjust thing during the January 6th. 2021 huge number, raging, murder threatening mob attack on our Capital building with our entire Congress inside.

    Capital police officer"s" died as the result of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome effects from the nightmare event they were forced to endure with thousands of these murder rage minded nut cases rushing them with shouts of "kill em" etc.

    If this mob of thousands were anyone but Trump nut supporters, Trump would have had armed to the teeth troops at the Capital building within minutes of it's starting with orders to shoot to kill whomever they wanted.

    Then, Trump would be bragging he was the great hero protector of our Congress and Capital police.

    It's incredible that the Capital police held back shooting way more than just one time.

    Not only were they fearing and defending against shouted life and death threat violent attacks on our Congresspersons inside our sacred Democracy building ( including the Vice President himself) they themselves were being viciously attacked and beaten severely by this raging threatening mob. 

    In most similar great bodily harm threat incidents police will do whatever it takes to protect themselves including discharging their firearms. And legally authorized and justified to do so.

    They "remarkably" held off doing so in this nightmare violent attack.

    Ms. Babbit was killed. And ALL the blame for her death resides with her fellow rioting mobsters.

    Only "one" Republican party member attended the Presidential "Awards For Bravery" event yesterday honoring not just January 6th. fallen and injured Capital police officers, but other 2020 election integrity defending persons, all of whom were subjected to harrowing death threats for their doing so.

    No one can downplay the January 6th, 2021 attack on our Congress in their own sacred Democracy defending building of business without being to blame themselves in aiding, enabling and supporting those vicious criminal thugs. Many of whom are now serving guilty verdict sentences in prison for their violent death and injury causing and government overthrow attempt crimes.

  5. 50 minutes ago, Benjamin Cole said:

    How long until Deep Throat was revealed? 

    Were Woodward and Bernstein regarded as frauds until Deep Throat was revealed? 

     

     

     

    So, America is expected to perhaps wait up to years more after Carlson's claim to see whether or not it's true?

    This on top of the already 60 years waiting for the JFK truth after 11,22,1963?

    And in the meantime continue to hold Carlson up as some type of national hero just for making the claim?

    If Carlson does somehow produce some validating proof what then?

     

     

  6. 1 hour ago, Joseph McBride said:

    Oliver Stone does an excellent job with the 1944 Democratic

    convention and the dumping of Wallace in his documentary

    series on American history. This event that hasn't been

    explored much helped change the course of postwar

    American history as it led into what Gore Vidal dubbed

    the "national security state" under Truman. There's

    a good book on Roosevelt's health that discusses in detail how

    he was dying by 1944 and that insiders knew he probably wouldn't

    serve another full term.

    So true.

  7. 13 hours ago, Benjamin Cole said:

    I do not agree with everything TC said therein...but it is true: Ashley Babbit, an unarmed woman threatening no one, was perched in a window on Jan. 6 and shot dead from a distance.

    If this is a justifiable police murder...then, what isn't? 

    Also, five Capitol Police officers did not give their lives on Jan. 6, as indicated in the most recent hagiographies of the Capitol Police department and repeated yesterday.  This is conflating post-Jan. 6 deaths, including suicides, with the day of the event.

    The closest thing to a police officer dying on Jan. 6 was Brian Sicknick, who died a couple days later of a stroke. The DC coroner concluded no connection between the stroke and Jan. 6.

    Sicknick was never struck on the head, as widely reported. 

    It is hard to remember now, but the early M$M coverage was that the Capitol Police were a bunch of white racists, who let their fellow white racists sack the Capitol, but would have mowed down black protestors.

    Now the Capitol Police are lionized. Which version do you believe? 

    The truth is neither here nor there...the 3,500-member Capitol Police inexplicably barely showed up on Jan. 6 (their Commander of Civil Disturbances unit was at home making meat loaf) and then stood down. Numerous texts from arrested occupiers that day say they were "let in." 

    Indeed the Capitol Police, as correctly pointed out by Matt Allison, arrested almost no one that day. They let the rioters leave! Even from the enclosed Capitol, with limited exits!

    The homeless gadfly Mr Buffalo Horns was arrested in Arizona, after turning himself in the local FBI office.

    The subsequent post-Jan. 6 arrests were largely effected by using compliant telecom and social media services as intel ops, and tracking smartphones and texts. 

    Another story not told in the M$M.

    The Jan. 6 event, like the JFKA and the 9/11 event...well, the stories about the events are weaponized for political advantage or expediency. By all sides. 

    The Jan. 6 rioters were no heroes. A very high fraction of the rioters appear mentally troubled.

    Another large fraction had Hispanic surnames, and may have been federal assets, or extremists. 

    The federal government declines to reveal how many assets they had in the Jan. 6 scrum, and only in court revealed the heavy infiltration they had of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys.   

    You think you know the full Jan. 6 story? I don't. 

     

     

    It's offensive to me that anyone would even try to portray Babbit's killing as the most tragic and unjust thing during the January 6th. 2021 huge number, raging, murder threatening mob attack on our Capital building with our entire Congress inside.

    Capital police officer"s" died as the result of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome effects from the nightmare event they were forced to endure with thousands of these murder rage minded nut cases rushing them with shouts of "kill em" etc.

    If this mob of thousands were anyone but Trump nut supporters, Trump would have had armed to the teeth troops at the Capital building within minutes of it's starting with orders to shoot to kill whomever they wanted.

    Then, Trump would be bragging he was the great hero protector of our Congress and Capital police.

    It's incredible that the Capital police held back shooting way more than just one time.

    Not only were they fearing and defending against shouted life and death threat violent attacks on our Congresspersons inside our sacred Democracy building ( including the Vice President himself) they themselves were being viciously attacked and beaten severely by this raging threatening mob. 

    In most similar great bodily harm threat incidents police will do whatever it takes to protect themselves including discharging their firearms. And legally authorized and justified to do so.

    They "remarkably" held off doing so in this nightmare violent attack.

    Ms. Babbit was killed. And ALL the blame for her death resides with her fellow rioting mobsters.

     

  8. 3 hours ago, Marjan Rynkiewicz said:

    I uncovered lots about Hickey's accidental (negligent) shooting (homicide) of JFK -- see my 135 postings -- i started 3 threads.

    My postings include a fair bit about the attempted assassination by Oswald (fired 2 shots).

     

    Go for it Marjan R.! 

    Love your passion and appreciate the time and effort you put into your forum contributions.

     

    The integrity of this forum is greatly determined by how much all of us here respect "every poster's shared opinions and theories" regards the JFK/Oswald/Jack Ruby story no matter how different from our own.

    A debate about JFK truth ideas is made much more worthy when the debaters keep such from devolving into personal ad hominem slings and arrows.

    I love reading JFK truth proposing theories here on the forum no matter how different they are from my own especially if they are respectfully presented.

    Keeps the discussion here interestingly lively and refreshed and energized from time to time.

    Years ago, one poster seemed to be quite obsessed about the sex lives of all the main characters in the JFK story and even later regards future politicians and their partners.

    Even though much of his claims might have been very possibly true (and IMO actually not totally unimportant in the larger picture of influence, personal character revealing and motivations ) I think the forum decided to draw a line regards that one poster.

    But over-all this forum has been very tolerant imo.

     

  9. I wonder what the waiting time factor will be regards Carlson's bombshell claim losing it's roaring locomotive steam and credibility if he doesn't produce even one validating source for his story?

    How much time will those who heaped heroic level praise on TC for his courageous earth shaking JFK truth emancipation proclamation give him to show them the goods?

    With each month's passing after this history rocking TC revelation and "no there there" being the second and third acts...me thinks the old Broderick Crawford "Highway Patrol" line "okay fella, the gig is up" will be a fitting one to put this matter and TC himself in their proper place. 

  10. 49 minutes ago, Ron Bulman said:

    “Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an American President?” And here’s the reply we received verbatim. Quote, “The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It’s a whole different country from what we thought it was. It’s all fake.”

    It's All Fake.  Who uses that line regularly?  Fake this fake that, Fake News.  Who else promotes fake news for a living?  All good news if it contributes to freeing the files!

    Interesting take Ron.

    You may be on to something there.

     

  11. 54 minutes ago, Matt Allison said:

    I'd like to think there are 7-8 Republicans in the House that would like to get off the Titanic here, and be open to making a deal with the Dem caucus for the next Speaker. Nominate former GOP house member Fred Upton, or someone like him.

    Y'know, a rational and sane human that isn't a traitor. That's all we're looking for here, folks.

    HERE HERE!

  12. 1 hour ago, Mark Knight said:

    It's blatantly obvious that the Republicans aren't seeking to govern. Instead, this is the Revenge Tour. A large segment of the Republicans simply want to use their majority in the House to wreak revenge on those they designate as "enemies."

    In another sense, what we've seen over the past 3 days is the legacy of the "Reagan Revolution." This generation was brought up on the "government is evil" rhetoric of those years. They are out to dismantle government in any and every way possible. The only legislation I've heard any of them advocate is repeal oriented.  The want no part of DOING anything; their mission is UNDOING things that came before. The anarchy they are demonstrating in the House is an example of how they intend to "govern."

    I also don't think McCarthy deserves to be Speaker of the House, because he's spineless. But until someone nominates a candidate who is moderate enough to win over some Democrats, the 20 who are staunchly against McCarthy will continue to have their way, and gum up the works of government.

    And that is not by accident. That's by design.

    HERE HERE!

  13. 46 minutes ago, Kirk Gallaway said:

    I also see myself as such a self appointed expert, Joe. He does have the same  Brooklyn accent as Allen. The tenor of his voice, and his vocal range  is very similar. It would have turned my attention as well. But in my judgment, it's not Woody Allen.

    Though you can take comfort that in one of Allen's earlier movies,  he did  mockingly play a character in a passing dialog that was obsessed with the JFKA.

    Somebody here can tell us which movie that was , as I forgot.

     

     

     

    Kirk, 

    The fact that Allen even thought up and inserted a JFKA obsessed character into one of his films suggests to me his interest.

    Allen had a very distinctive inflection voice, pitch, pacing and accent that to me matched perfectly the one we hear at the end of the Mark Lane interview if only a few spoken sentences.

    I am a Woody Allen film buff, having seen everyone. I have also gone on You Tube and watched his early years appearances on many national audience TV shows doing his stand-up Shtick.

    I've listened to the Lane interview call a dozen times now.

    Every new time I am more convinced it is Allen.

    Listen again to the New York City callers pronunciation of the word "Marine."

    Also the words "the head."

    Also the words "shot" and "not." He has a unique pronunciation of those two words that is distinctive Allen-esque.

    How about a friendly bet between us regards this hugely important matter?

  14. 5 hours ago, Joseph McBride said:

    Thanks, Joe. I hadn't heard that before.

    I met Mark Lane once, and we exchanged

    mutual respect. He ran my two Bush articles

    in an appendix to PLAUSIBLE DENIAL and elsewhere in that book praised my research

    into George H. W. Bush and the assassination. I was grateful,

    since he did so much to advance the case

    early on when few people were dissenting

    from the official story. I include 35 pages

    on my Bush research and his Texas rightwing connections

    in INTO THE NIGHTMARE. The Nation refused

    to run my third article, about Bush's relationship

    with James Parrott, even though they had enabled

    me to continue my research by going to Texas.

    Victor Navasky, then the editor of The Nation,

    told me I should avoid researching the

    assassination because it is a "quagmire." I write

    at length in my recent book POLITICAL TRUTH about the

    failure of the left/liberal media in the US

    to investigate or admit the truth about the assassination.

    JM and others here...must mention also that at the 34 minute mark of this Larry King/Mark Lane interview broadcast...a caller-in is identified as being from New York City.

    Listen closely to this caller's voice as he speaks about the documented discrepancy regarding Oswald's rifle shooting skills.

    This caller is...Woody Allen!

    I would swear to it based on my self-anointed "expert" ability to identify famous people to their recorded audio speech tone, pitch, manner, accent etc.

    Both Larry King and Mark Lane do not say a word about this caller from New York City's true identity, but listen for yourself and tell me I'm wrong.

    Just another very interesting ( if quirky ) aspect to this great Mark Lane interview imo.

     

  15. 18 hours ago, Joe Bauer said:

    I'm surprised no one here on this thread has commented on this incredible interview of Mark Lane by Larry King.

    Besides Lane's remarkably researched insights into and promoting of this thread's main topic proposition, he mentions and praises our very own Joseph McBride's revelatory work when JM was writing and contributing to "The Nation" magazine.

    Lane first comments on Joseph McBride beginning right at the 20 minute, 50 second time mark of the interview.

     

  16. As a tax paying law abiding American citizen I am disgusted and angered with the Republican members of Congress wasting our federal government responsibility needs time and energy on this circus, all while being paid from our tax dollars.

    Not only are you wasting precious United States governing time and energy...you are making a mockery of our Congress, it's business and it's integrity at the same time.

    This failed house speaker spectacle is sending a disheartening kind of message to our young people regards seeing our highest legislative body at it's worst.

    Stop this childish tomfoolery. Will you?

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...