-
Posts
2,020 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Micah Mileto
-
As with JFK, there are any number of ways one could mix or match different multiple shooter scenarios. Blanks are just mentioned as one of many possibilities. There are a couple of witnesses who say they remember seeing bits of what looked like paper come out of the barrel of the gun as it was firing. Also, a flame coming out of the barrel which would be too long to match the length of the short flame that comes out when firing an ordinary 22 round.
-
Unfortunately for RFK, there was no film of his shooting, only witnesses. With JFK, there's a chance that with the Zapruder film there may actually come an era where "Illuminati confirmed" is literal in the physical scientific sense. Angelos Leiloglou's computer model of Dealey Plaza may or may not be the breaking point for the official story, as far as physical science is concerned about the lone gunman theory.
-
Creating the Oswald Legend Part 5
Micah Mileto replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Why does Blunt only give a few researchers the stuff he found at the Archives? Why not post it in bulk all on the internet himself? -
Chesser/Mantik cut from Mock Trial
Micah Mileto replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Did Wayne Cooke say that O'Neill said "the cranium was empty", or was it just "Wayne, there was no brain" or something else that could be taken to mean there was "virtually" no brain? -
McClelland is saying that, although he does personally believe in a gunman situated on the right-front of Kennedy, he did not personally see an entry wound on the right-front of Kennedy's head, but such a wound could have existed if it was hidden by the hair and blood. Here are some links I made with McClelland's other drawings (I know i'm missing at least one): 10/5/2015 drawing 1 [link]; 10/5/2015 drawing 2 [link] [link 2]; 11/12/2015 interview at Allen Public Library; 12/22/2016 drawing [link]; 2016 speech at Berkner High School; 2/28/2017 drawing [link]; 4/6/2017 drawing 1 [link] [link 2]; 4/6/2017 drawing 2 [link]; 4/10/2017 drawing 1 [link]; 4/10/2017 drawing 2 [link]; 6/14/2017 drawing 1 [link]; 6/14/2017 drawing 2 [link]; 7/17/2017 drawing [link] [link 2] [link 3]; 2/16/2018 drawing [link]; Undated drawing 1; Undated drawing 2 [link] [link 2] [link 3] [link 4] [link 5] [link 6]; Undated drawing 3 [link] [link 2] [link 3]; Undated drawing 4 [link]; Undated drawing 5 [link]; Undated audio at studentsforrenew.org)
-
Oswald and JFK together...in 1959!
Micah Mileto replied to Vince Palamara's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Second biggest understatement in the history of headlines. First biggest: -
Correction: Schwinn said that he was shown the JFK photo around 1981 by his late professor and a stranger. I am wondering if he could have seen a work of art or one of those bad Robert Groden photo-mock-ups. Did very many people have access to the Fox or Groden autopsy photos in 1981?
-
These quotes cannot be used to debunk the "surgery of the head" statement from the Sibert & O'Neill report. From Sibert’s notes on a 8/8/1990 phone call from David Lifton: 4. Discussed "surgery in head area" told him was Humes statement and that large piece of skull later came in which accounted for Humes original remark Looking back maybe we should have asked him after piece of skull arrived Does this piece of skull rule out your remark about surgery in head area? (ARRB MD 216) If Sibert said that “Looking back maybe we should have asked” if the late-arriving skull fragment ruled out pre-autopsy surgery, then this may discredit the 10/24/1978 affidavit where Sibert said that the surgery statement “was determined not to be correct following detailed inspection and when the piece of bone found in the limousine was brought to the autopsy room”. That could have been pure speculation of Sibert’s part, not something that was indicated to him by the pathologists. And, from Bugliosi's own quote, Sibert did not actually say the pathologists indicated they were referring to the missing portion of skull. Sibert only said "Well, if you were there, it couldn't have been more clear that that's what he was talking about. He said this as soon as he saw the president's head. He hadn't looked close-up for any evidence of surgery to the head when he said this. I'm positive that's what he was referring to".
-
Sibert's Quote about Specter
Micah Mileto replied to James DiEugenio's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Sibert said that he got the impression that Specter did not like the shallow back wound information as noted in the reports by him and O'Neill. -
A prayer-man-with-oswald-taking-orders theory might have Oswald intentionally standing outside with the intention of being seen by others, because he at least suspected something was up.
-
Anybody know of where one can find David's hypnosis tape?
-
Thank you.
-
I think cd-roms of the 1993 and 2003 presentations are on sale at a steep price.