Andrew Prutsok

That's some pretty nasty stuff to say about someone's family.

W had just turned in 17 in the preceding July. Was he really at Yale at 17?

What about him serving up James Parrot to the FBI? Or even more strange, Barbara's bizarre, suspicious "letter home" to her "family" during her three-day campaign trip in which she is sitting in a salon and writes about hearing about the president's shooting just now on the radio. We learn of his death before she gets to the end of the letter.

Of course the government censoring the Internet is an abomination. Why aren't Google, FB, YouTube, Instagram, et. al., subject to the same rules and regulations that newspapers and television have to follow? You cause to be published something false or defamatory, you can be held accountable via . civil suit. I could grow my newspaper circulation tremendously, I think, were I not held liable for what was printed in it.

Qanon is like Pizzagate on bath salts.

Wow. I was joking here. You can't assume anything. http://jfkcountercoup.blogspot.com/2013/05/phil-ochs-at-dealey-plaza.html

And he died just as the House investigation was Ramping up...hmmmm.

Unlike the subtlety of blowing the president of the United States' head off in broad daylight in a major city before hundreds of witnesses?

Marks never like to admit being scammed. We know as of last night that Trump was provided direct evidence that Putin personally directed the attack prior to the inauguration. It is not a matter of opinion. And he has continued to lie about it since. There is no longer any rationalization available to his supporters to justify it.

So you consider racist appeals to the worst instincts of the worst Americans, backed up by Russian subterfuge "smart?" Seems to lean more toward "evil," "vile" or "traitorous."

Mueller hasn’t said anything.

Are we defending Europe or occupying Europe? I’d be a might resentful and uncooperative, perhaps if asked to pony up tax dollars to fund Russian troops’ presence in the US. I harbor no I’ll will toward Russia for meddling in our elections. Fair is fair. We do it everywhere, just with less style and panache, to quote Clay Shaw from JFK. With that said, any U. S. Citizen who aided and abetted that effort is a filthy traitor who should be imprisoned for life or executed.

Isn’t this just the electronic breaking into the DNC offices? Weird.

It was so popular because it was basically a welfare state, for those not horribly oppressed.

Here’s part one of a BBC documentary on the Wall Street coup, which I thought was well done.

I heard Hersh on NPR say the media should back off Trump criticism, or something to that effect.

I couldn't get the sarcasm font to work.

On second thought, it couldn't have been Poppy Bush because he was not connected to the CIA until being tapped to run it in 1976.

Wasn't Poppy Bush running the Harris County Republican Party in Houston at that time? Happy Birthday to him by the way.

Prescott Bush’s Coup. The family seemed to have a knack for hanging around the fringes if attempted coups.

Bezos is not involved in the Post's day-to-day editorial operations.

Another piece on Intrepid Report attacking the Boston Globe's recent efforts to brand anyone who doesn't know Sirhan is guilty a "conspiracy nut," and sourcing everything to Danel Moldea. He cites Jim DiEugenio in debunking Moldea's work. "As the night follows day, we meet conspiracy nuts here too, courtesy of DeCosta-Klipa who allows Moldea a free hand to spout nonsense. A person not familiar with the research done on this case by the great researcher Lisa Pease and others would assume that Moldea was the expert par excellence on RFK’s assassination, when nothing could be further from the truth. James DiEugenio, Pease’s colleague and an equally brilliant researcher, has surgically dismembered Moldea’s work on the case...It is unlikely that he has read Moldea’s 1995 book, The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy, a book about which DiEugenio rightly says: its “every major tenet is highly suspect, whose sourcing is not explicit, whose fairness is, to say the least, one-sided, whose completeness is just not there, whose use of witnesses-like Kaiser and McCowan-is rather lenient. . . . it is a ‘bookshelf’ book that has no intellectual content or substance.” He suggests it was commissioned by the government forces responsible for RFK’s death and the ongoing cover-up." http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/24242

Apologies for making the same point Ty did. I had not read through the entire thread.

Obviously, maybe you did.

“The brains behind the cover-up were brilliant in predicting how the media would react and swallow quick release of fake news about Lee Harvey Oswald.” I’m not sure they were “brilliant” as much they were just confident. They infiltrated every major media outlet in the country with their minions.