Jump to content
The Education Forum

Andrew Prutsok

Members
  • Posts

    542
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Andrew Prutsok's Achievements

  1. They always, ALWAYS, accuse their opponent of the very things they are doing.
  2. I thought below was the question being asked in the initial post in this thread to which an answer was sought: What evidence (needn’t even be proof, since the two words have different meanings) can any of the above muster for the assertion that Ekdahl did anything other than his traveling electrical consultant job for EBASCO? As in, you know, intel? And perhaps you could hazard a guess why he would take (a) Marguerite with him while doing this TOP SECRET work?
  3. So, if someone answers the question directly and provides evidence, it still doesn't mean anything?
  4. Things are hopping in the Caribbean.
  5. So did Theorharis content Hoover was not a cross-dresser, or that it just wasn't important?
  6. What a great article. Not sure I buy that the author's conclusion that Phillips was totally innocent because he became involved too early. His involvement apparently dates from March of 1962. I wouldn't be surprised if the conspirators had decided by then what had to be done.
  7. Big shocker here: "Two Americans arrested in connection with the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse of Haiti this week said that they were not in the room when he was killed and that they had worked only as translators for the hit squad."..."Judge Noël said that it was [one of the Americans] who had yelled that the assailants were agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency over a loudspeaker at the start of the assault."
  8. Chait's a hack. Generally wrong about everything.
  9. Well, this story apparently fell apart pretty quickly. This has apparently been out there for years and is not a part of the training program. The poster regrets the error.
  10. I guess Merrick Garland is coming after everyone who rubs the establishment the wrong way, not just Proud Boys, Oathkeepers and Nazis. U.S. MILITARY TRAINING DOCUMENT SAYS SOCIALISTS REPRESENT “TERRORIST” IDEOLOGY https://theintercept.com/2021/06/22/socialists-counterterrorism-political-terrorists-navy-antifa/
  11. Levity aside, that's as powerful as anything else.
  12. "I study UFOs – and I don’t believe the alien hype. Here’s why..." https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/11/i-study-ufos-and-i-dont-believe-the-alien-hype-heres-why?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=edit_2221&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1623413176
  13. Spent some time down in our paper's basement yesterday reading 1963 coverage of the assassination. Noticed this in a Monday, Nov. 26 AP article headlined: There was little abut Lee Oswald to warn world that he was coming": ...(Michael) Paine said Oswald talked Marxism, Marxism, Marxism. "Oswald refused to eschew violence as a method for achieving desired ends." Tried to post a photo of it but I can't get the file to be small enough.
  14. Haven't been paying a lot of attention to this thread but heard someone suggest that the military may just be teasing us with UFO stuff to divert attention from Oliver Stone's new work. "Hey, look at this shiny thing over here instead!"
×
×
  • Create New...