Michael Clark

MEAPRON Not in MFF https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10258.pdf

Docs in support of previous post https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10239.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10240.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10241.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10242.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10247.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10249.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10250.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10253.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10259.pdf https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10261.pdf 12-12-64 Dec 16 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10255.pdf March 4, 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10129.pdf April 16, 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10111.pdf Jan 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10149.pdf june 18, 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10160.pdf June 15, 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10164.pdf June 15, 64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10165.pdf May 20, 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10181.pdf May, 20, 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10183.pdf May 5, 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10192.pdf May 5, 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10193.pdf May 5, 1964 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10194.pdf I stopped moving forward through the list here. Going back in the list now. 6-4-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10189.pdf 6-18-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10188.pdf 9-11-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10183.pdf 9-13-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10178.pdf 9-18-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10175.pdf 9-24-63 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10215-10173.pdf 9-21-64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10234-10424.pdf

I didn't use weasle words, you did. You accused a DA and later elected (not even appointed, ELECTED!) judge of malicious false prosecution. I called you out on that. Following your diversionary questions would let you off the hook. Gambit declined.

More weasle-words, but I guess that was close enough. And to be sure, Clay Shaw was not convicted. That does not mean he was innocent. A Jury Jury indicted him. Garrison is being convicted by YOU, and no one else.

We're not going to let your pretend that you forgot what you said David. No weasling out of it. This is what you said. That's what you said David. What say you David Von Pein?

You avoide the question...

So you Slander an elected former DA who was soon thereafter elected to a judgeship. Do you have any proof that Garrison knowingly brought false charges against Clay Shaw? Did Garrison ever admit to falsely accusing Shaw? Was he ever charged and convicted for doing so? David Von Pein sinks to lower and lower depths, methinks!

I haven’t read it, but, if a guy has a tattoo of Nixon tattoo on his back he is not going to be regarded, by me, as a wellspring of truth. There might be limited hangouts Therin but do you want to invest your time in sorting out the lies? The biggest lie probably resides in the title; that would make the most sense to me. Cast it into the same bin as Howard Hunt’s “confession”, IMO.

Paul, these are docs from which I will try to trace back to the Madrid and Frankfurt connections of which I mentioned to you. There will be more to come in this post. This next one is important Paul. I will try to get back to explain why... keep in mind that I see Paris as a transitional meeting place between Madrid and Frankfurt. 12-21-64 https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10216-10246.pdf

I had no idea that CBS was fighting off the fact of photo fakery with regard to the BYP’s as far back as 1967. Thanks David Von Pein.

This is ridiculous, David The bunching is so exaggeratedly depicted that you can’t say that Myers wasn’t trying to make a point by emphasizing it. Your claim quoted above just shows that you are squirming here. It’s pathetic

9 pages. Various minutes of meeting, special group. I will hopefully get back to this and edit in some notes of interest. @Paul Brancato , note second page. Assassination devices being prepared and offered to AMLASH (Cuebela) in late 63. I believe I can show you, Paul, with some digging, that AMLASH was in Madrid at this time, and these arrangements would have been made through Frankfurt. I also think that I can show that Phillips was working in Madrid and Europe, outside of his WH (Western Hemisphere) area of responsibility. He did this because so many of his principals for action in the WH were in Madrid. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/157-10008-10238.pdf

Vecania at Havana Embassy and in contact with Bishop in 1960. Mitch Werbell Masferrer https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/157-10004-10158.pdf Raynoldo Pico, associate of Artime, was one of the Watergate group. ( Never heard this before)

Vecania at Havana Embassy and in contact with Bishop in 1960. Mitch Werbell Masferrer https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/157-10004-10158.pdf

Thanks for confirming that. It's difficult for me to go back and find documents when I was just cruising through them. Fortunately, related documents tend to be grouped together. If I get back to one, I will likely find the others again.

I'll have to re-read some of the documents I have read. I could swear that I saw documents stating that Veciana got CIA money on numerous occasions, I think to the point of annoyance. I didn't realize it was a point of contention.

Tracy, to be sure, which one is it? Demonstrably false or apparently false?

Francois, you missed it. That is the point.

AENIMROD Not in MFF. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10215-10024.pdf

Thanks for sharing that Jim. It was a very succinct evaluation of the subject of the history of the USA since 1963.

I really don't see the value in engaging these guys. They are just given the opportunity to shuck and jive and repeat their falsehoods with subtle nuanced changes (sound familiar?). Meanwhile, worthwhile debate, study, debate and research time is missed.

A curious document re: Thayer Waldo, AKA Mark Thayer LNERGO Garrison https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10010-10043.pdf More on Waldo WOMUSE https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/104-10010-10044.pdf

New release doc. Re: Sergio Aracha Smith https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32248399.pdf

51 pages ofinteriews, tracking, and documenting Mark Lane's travels and associations. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32212202.pdf

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/docid-32212200.pdf You can only make this stuff up. May, 1971 Lane connects with leftist Vietnamese elements, supports the Communist Party and wants to collaborate with Jane Fonda