Jump to content
The Education Forum

Michael Clark

Members
  • Posts

    4,737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Clark

  1. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10100-10092.pdf YOGURT Not in MFF YOLAND-1 Not in MFF
  2. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10096-10337.pdf Wilcott / Oswald 201 file
  3. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10077-10393.pdf 11-14 Maybe Athens? AMILL Not in MFF AMILL-1. Not in MFF THMALTO Not in MFF THMALTO-10 Not in MFF
  4. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10077-10393.pdf AMILL Not in MFF AMILL-10 Not in MFF TUMALTO Not in MFF 11-14 maybe Athens
  5. https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10077-10186.pdf AMCAB Not in MFF AMCAB-1. Not in MFF
  6. I am looking to decode location code 15-8. Any examples would be appreciated.
  7. I didn’t see it last night, but now I see a person with a cell phone at his or her ear.
  8. http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/jfk/NARA-Oct2017/2018/104-10095-10151.pdf Two Soviet double agents (AE’s), the latter shot after returning to Russia after meeting UNACUTE in Paris. P.50 Not in MFF AECANEY AECYMAR UNACUTE
  9. This is an important topic for us. The recent documents release has a few offerings which detail the way in which the the CIA, by certain acts of Congress and or the Executive Branch skimmed the cream off the the top of the armed services. I and sure they are in the New Documents Release thread. There is also a Fletcher Prouty video out there, which I have not been able to relocate, in which he illustrates this process and comments on its tremendous effect on the mindset of the Clandestine Services.
  10. Reminds me of Nagall’s attempt to avoid getting caught-up in the upcoming operation. In Oswald’s case he is trying associate himself with the Navy, in case someone wants to make a patsy out of him. Just the first thing that came to mind.
  11. P.23 of the following PDF http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/jfk/NARA-Oct2017/2018/104-10095-10151.pdf None are in MFF. AEDACRON AEDARING AESWIFT AEGLOO AETYPHOON AEMINUS AEFLASK The following is from the above document: “The point is made and emphasized in the notebook that the KGB disinformation Department was formed in 1959. This is a very misleading fact. As Rostvorov and Golytsin have reported, there was a Disinformation Services in the KI, and Golytsin confirmed that the function continued after the KI dissolved in 1951, although there was no separate element for it. Most of the Soviet disinformation agents known to us were running against us before 1959, and the most sophisticated ones, Belitskiy, AEDACRON, and probably AEGLOO, were conceived and executed before 1959. The establishment of a separate Disinformation Department, therefore, appears to have followed the heyday of the disinformation operation, rather than preceded it. Certainly, new operations have been conceived since, such as AETYPHOON in redacted and AEFLASK n redacted and probably others, as Indicated by our memos to CSR on AEDARING and AEMINUS, but the days of the disinformation agent probably have been numbered since Noseko’s exposure of Belitsky.”
  12. 75 years ago. An immense struggle, worthy of rememberence. Youtube’s “The History Guy” posted a new video, which I shared.
  13. 75 years ago, ... an immense struggle. Worthy of rememberence.
  14. Hi Larry, I would keep my eye out for them if I knew what to look for. Can you give an example of what you are looking for?
  15. Doorway man always looked, to me, like he was leaning around a wall, not standing at a center staircase railing. It is so hard to avoid concluding that PM and DwM have to be the same person, regardless of the sleeves and the BL likeness.
  16. Hi Ernie, Thanks for the reply. As David noted, all of the links in your post return a 404 error, for some reason. Chhers, Mike
  17. It does not. Been there. James even acknowledged that at one point.
  18. I’m not sure what sacked means. It’s just a fun word to use. He has been put on 2PPD, which, from my observations, means he can’t post at all. For example, Jim Harwood is on 2PPD, and we haven’t heard from him since. I have wondered what the 2PPD thing is really all about. I have speculated that it averages your allowed post count with the number of days you have been a member. If so, with his low post count, 118, he would be able to post at 236 days of membership. Again, just speculating. It’s a strange forum function.
×
×
  • Create New...