Jump to content
The Education Forum

Keyvan Shahrdar

Members
  • Posts

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Keyvan Shahrdar

  1. It is time to re-evaluate this conspiracy. It can no longer be ignored that JFK's head shot originated from the pergola. There are two films, The Nix film and the Bronson film that show irrefutable evidence that 1. a shot from the second window from the top and 2. gunmen leaving the pergola.
  2. Hi Richard, This is not a hypothesis. In the Nix film, you see a shot from the pergola window. You see a gunman exit the pergola. You see another gunman shoot and create a vapor trail. You then see the gunman exit the pergola. In the Bronson film, you see a shot from the same pergola window that a shot is seen in the Nix film. You also see a gunman leave the pergola from the same place a gunman leave the pergola in the Nix film. The film evidence shows a shot from the pergola. What witnesses say is different from what actually occurred. The Parkland doctors can say what they want to say, the Nix and Bronson film says otherwise. What the films show and the autopsy pictures and x-rays show is that a bullet entered JFK right above the ear, hitting the temporal bone (not the temple), the thickest bone in the skull, causing a tangential shot exiting the top of his skull. In the Zfilm frame 313, you see the bullet/skull matter fly towards the south side of Elm street grassy area. This shot alone tells you where the shot came from. From the right side of Mr. Zapruder. The second windows from the top of the pergola. The autopsy photograph shows the damage to the top of his ear. Look at the scalp fatty tissue with blood spread to the left of the path of the bullet toward the top of his head. This photograph shows you the path of the bullet. The orderly who is now a pathologist, Dr. James Curtis Jenkins, who assisted Dr. Boswell, to this day says the brain was damaged in the right back area, but otherwise, the brain was in tack. That is what the autopsy x-ray shows and Dr. Hume's WC testimony states. There was a wound of entry to the back of JFK, but most probably at zframe 231-232 when his head moves forward. There is no exit for this bullet. I would venture and say this bullet killed JFK, severing his brain stem, as noted by Dr. Jenkins.
  3. Hi Chris, I found that the copy of Nix I have shows slightly less than The Groden version Chris Davidson posted. Keyvan>> That is not a Robert Groden version. Groden's version does not show the film spokes. If it is a shooter how are they leaving just 2/3 of a second after the head shot? Keyvan>>The Groden copy is a copy of the original Nix Film. The only 1st generation copy that I know of. What we see in the film is movement (gunmen leaving). If I were a gunman, I would get out of there asap. I would not stay there an instant longer. Since there are gunshots and there is movement afterwards, that is what occurred. It is hard to accept, but it is what it is. As for the timing of the gunmen leaving, it cannot be determined as the speed of the film is variable, but from personal experience shooting paintball, I shoot and leave a scene, this can be done within one to two seconds. I do want to mention that I do see movement of another person leaving before the gunman can be seen leaving on the nix film. What we see there is: 1) A shot from the second window from the top of the pergola. 2) Movement of a gunman leaving the pergola towards the rail yard parking lot. 3) A vapor trail with the head of the gunman showing at the wall edge of the front opening, his head aligns with the 2nd window from the bottom. A partial head of the gunman is seem various times in the wall edge of the pergola before the vapor trail is seen. I spoke to Gary Mack extensively about the vapor trail in 2008. He always told me to ignore it. I did for a while until I got a copy of the Groden version of the Nix film. I have asked the Sixth Floor Museum to make public frames similar to the Zapruder film so researchers can better study the film. Unfortunately, the Groden version converted the original film to Beta and then digitally transferred to what we see now. But from what we can view in it, we really need a high definition version from the original. 4) The Mary Moorman photo shows a partial gunman in the same wall edge. The coloration of the gunman has the same coloration as Mr. Zapruder and Ms. Sitzman on the pedestal. 5) Movement of the vapor trail gunman leaving the pergola towards the rail yard parking lot is seen. 2nd gunman before vapor trail: 2nd gunmen right before vapor trail and vapor trail 2nd gunman movement images after the vapor trail: The Mary Ann Moorman photo sourced from NBC - Shows the same color for Zapruder, Sitzman, and gunman. I have always wondered about the man figure exiting the pergola - I marked it with a '?'. Is that gunman #1 getting out of the pergola? The pergola seems to be the perfect place for the gunmen. We have a) Zapruder and Sitzman in the pedestal. b) Gunmen inside the pergola. In my head, a will be cover for b. It is hard for me to think that Zapruder & Sitzman are part of the conspiracy. Sitzman denied gunmen in the pergola in her interview. Zapruder did not. This below image is for reference. The 2nd window from the bottom, bottom side is about six feet. I am six feet and I can view out that windows.
  4. I replied on your thread: " Hi Chris, I have to disagree with you here. Once you see the vapor trail on the Nix film, you see an immediate reaction downward by JC. In the Zapruder film zframe 331, JC moves to the middle of the car and gets hit, you see a sharp downward reaction by JC and Zapruder's camera even jiggles at zframe 331. By zframe 336 you can start seeing a discoloration on the back of JC's jacket that was not there before."
  5. Hi Chris, I have to disagree with you here. Once you see the vapor trail on the Nix film, you see an immediate reaction downward by JC. In the Zapruder film zframe 331, JC moves to the middle of the car and gets hit, you see a sharp downward reaction by JC and Zapruder's camera even jiggles at zframe 331. By zframe 336 you can start seeing a discoloration on the back of JC's jacket that was not there before.
  6. Hi Chris, you can definitely see movement of a person in the pergola thruway on this version of the Nix film. Can I have a copy of this film? I'll pay!
  7. Gotcha. This is the Robert Groden Nix Gunman image. This is the Sixth Floor Museum copy of the Nix film. Both of those images are similar and they match up with movement on the Charles Bronson film below. This appear right after this image of a gunshot:
  8. Hi Chris, Let's say: 00 top left 01 top right 10 bottom left 11 bottom right Can you explain each picture you posted and the location to the full frame of the picture? I am interested in understanding what you are looking at. I am good at discerning figures in fuzzy images.
  9. Also note, this image is from the JFK.org website. I ordered the digital film from them, which I should have by next week.
  10. That is right, compared to the Robert Groden version of the Nix film below. Unfortunately I cannot upload additional emails. Here is the drop box link - https://www.dropbox.com/s/van8e4pc4hrickl/JFK-Head-Shot_Robert_Groden_Nix_Film.PNG?dl=0
  11. Both the Nix film and the Bronson film show movement of figures exiting the pergola. In the Bronson film you can see a blue man figure.
  12. In studying the Nix and Bronson films I came across these images. In the Robert Groden version of the Nix film you can see a shot from the second window from the top, right after that shot, you see a figure exiting the pergola. In the Bronson film, you see the second window sort of engulfed in smoke and then a blue man figure exiting the pergola. I cropped a film from the Bronson film displayed in the Sixth Floor Museum website jfk.org. I used a free to download and use program named Cyberlink PowerDirector 365 to view the images frame by frame. Gunman-Exiting-Pergola.mp4 Charles_Bronson_slow_motion.mp4
  13. Sam Kinney strikes again. Great job @Vince PalamaraI would say you have made great contribution towards the riddle wrapped in an enigma.
  14. I have thought about this video for some time. To me: Second hand source is questionable, but let me verbalize my thoughts on it. Kinney finding a bullet in the limo and taking it inside the hospital and placing it in the stretcher raises many questions. 1. Kinney is a SSA, why would he place the bullet in the stretcher when he could have given it to Secret Service agent Richard Johnsen? 2. Did Kinney lie to Loucks? Possible if Kinney did not want his family & friends to know he was involved in the conspiracy. This is a way to justify "I was not involved." 3. Did Kinney plant the bullet in the stretcher? Again, why wouldn't he give it to the Secret Service agent Richard Johnsen? Why the stretcher? Does it make it seem more realistic to put the bullet in the stretcher than to give it to someone? Why wouldn't the conspirators say, the bullet was found in the car? They would have come up with the SBT regardless of where the bullet was found. I can see why they wanted a pristine bullet in order to match to the rifle. To me, this story from Loucks does not sound plausible.
  15. Greg, Do you have links that I can look at in the Mary Ferrell website about the testimony and statements of the officers involved? Fact: Walthers never saw what he reported. (Walthers under oath, Warren Commission testimony.) Keyvan>> Walthers testimony was on July 23, 1964, eight and a half months after the fact. You must look at his testimony through a political lens. During his testimony he never denied not seeing them. Fact: what was claimed (that there is no known witness who saw) has no verification of existence. No one later claims to see them. You have to ask, what happened to them, if they existed. Well, cue the Twilight Zone music and imagine (that's what is required: imagination) elaborate theories of secret second stashes of metal file boxes secretly shipped to the sheriff's office in addition to the ones delivered to Capt. Fritz at DPD as every officer reported that day. Then imagine they were all secretly disappeared. No evidence that happened, apart from a starting premise of inerrancy in Walthers' original statement (premise: no officer working for Sheriff Bill Decker would ever write a mistake). Keyvan>> There is a report signed by Walthers that there was information about Cuban sympathizers. Fact: it has never been explained how anti-Castro Cuban names and addresses are recognizeable by eyesight as distinguished from pro-Castro Cuban names, or no-Castro Cuban related names. On obvious possibility is Walthers' statement reflects some assumed association with Oswald's FPCC literature and pamphlets. In which case there is no Ruth Paine connection since Oswald's FPCC was not Ruth's doing. Keyvan>> This is conjecture in your part. Again, reference the document signed by Walthers. Rather than going for the simple explanation that Walthers wrote something incorrect, i.e. goofed--instead, elaborate and unsubstantiated mountains of conjectures and conspiracy theorizing gone amok are considered preferable explanations. Keyvan>> You are wanting a different result from the fact that Walthers wrote a report, explained there was literature about Cuban Sympathizers. Fact is fact. He wrote it, it is up to you to believe it or not.
  16. Tracy, The only material that I can find are newspaper articles and documentation in the form of webpages. These articles are written by reporters with content of what someone else said. You are taking the word of authors instead of actual evidence that exists. The evidence that I see is the document by Walthers. As I stated, I tend to believe first sourced material. Not to eliminate any other form of information, but chances are those are compromised. Keyvan
  17. Tracy, What evidence do you have that show an examination by the Dallas Police and the FBI on November 22, 1963 that states something different from Walthers report? Most of the so called "evidence" has to be seen through a political lens as the WC was political. Politicians lie to have "evidence" fit their narrative. In the eyes of the WC, Ruth Paine's file boxes could not have any information about Cuban sympathizer's. There are serious implications about the truthfulness of Ruth Paine and her motives with the document provided by Walthers. Ruth Paine is still alive and most likely will take her secrets to the grave. Keyvan
  18. I base my opinions based on facts, not conjecture or hearsay. Facts are: 1. Buddy Walthers created a report when the seven file boxes belonging to Ruth Paine were sequestered. 2. The report states there is literature concerning Cuban sympathizers. 3. Buddy Walthers cannot remember the report he created in his WC testimony. Those are facts. Facts don't change. What people say months or years later and not under oath is suspect. Thanks for you reply, this thread has gotten a lot of interest and it is one of the best threads I have seen in a while.
  19. The O.P. should base this thread of facts not conjecture. Clearly, Buddy Walthers states they found the literature in the house, it is in his document that he signed off on. His WC testimony does not debunk anything.
  20. Hi Michael, I am commenting on fact, in the Robert Groden film, there is a vapor trail and at to the top right of that vapor trail, there seems to be the head of the gunman. If you follow the trajectory of that "shot", you see JC's reaction, which is a sharp downward move. I do not believe what people say, it is all hearsay to me. Thanks for your comment. Keyvan
  21. I appreciate your response, I spoke to a good friend of mine, who eventually became a Major General in the Army. He served under General Lyman Lemnitzer. We debated this issue, he agrees, Bill Greer was supposed to get killed. FYI - He does not believe that Lemnitzer would have been involved in any conspiracy to assassinate JFK. I on the other hand, do believe that General Lemnitzer was involved. This is a blowup of the pergola in the grassy knoll taken from the Robert Groden version of the Nix film. You can clearly see the head of the gunman next to the pergola and the vapor trail of his shot. If you follow that trajectory of that shot, it leads to Governor John Connally, which a sharp downward reaction is seen right after the shot. Because of this shot and the shot to the chrome of the windshield, I believe the reason JFK was not shot on Houston St. was because they needed to shoot and kill the driver, Bill Greer.
  22. I have thought about this for decades. I can only conclude the reason why the sniper did not shoot while the car was on Houston St. is because there are supposed to be two people that get killed on that day. 1. JFK 2. Bill Greer
  23. Thanks for your guidance. Your website is a benefit to the community.
  24. I never thought about tracing a path through the x-ray skull of JFK until I was challenged by a person. Never crossed my mind that the entry hole was that big circle above the ear until my pathologist friend pointed it out yesterday! The x-ray is self explanatory with this tangential bullet channel.
  25. But in his ARRB interview he is quite clear on the film he used, and the process he used. He should be since he wrote the book on them. And he taught the classes. Keyvan>> He is not sure, did you listen to him. In 1963 they were transitioning from 4x5 to 35 mm film. His assistant was taking photographs as well and he did not know what he used. He did not know the camera that he used. He used the camera that was on the camera stand. He did not know if JFK's autopsy photos were taken in black and white or in color or both. He assumed they took color photos because his protocol was to take the black/white then the color photographs. He even mentioned that his assistants camera film was taken out of the camera by a Secret Service agent. He also mentions the logs that they are supposed to take to match up each photograph and keep a record of everything. He also mentions that he does not remember if he kept a log. He also mentions that he works under the direct supervision of the pathologist. He takes photographs that he is told to take. If you are going to argue it was not planted at Parkland, then you most likely have to argue that somehow the bullet was switched on its way from there to FBI HQ. Keyvan>> If CE399 was not planted at Parkland, Secret Service & FBI had months to create it. IMO - Not worth arguing something that cannot be proved. I am not looking at the JFK assassination as you do or most people do. I look at evidence and fit them in place. I don't believe anything anyone says. Just look at evidence. What I look at: We don't know if CE399 was used in the assassination. There are more than one gunman. Was JFK's first shot in the throat? What JFK's first shot in the back? What I know is: Zframes show a ghost gunman on the roof top of the Records building under what looks like a lamp. The Nix film shows the Records building roof top with a lamp. The zframe ghost gunman looks like he fired a shot and at the same time, JFK's head snapped forward and down. There is a bullet mark on the cement of the manhole cover on the south side of Elm street that points to the the top of the Records building. Listening to John Stringer, he mentions that he remembers the probe getting inserted to the back of JFK. It would not go through. My thoughts on this: CE399 was probably from the Records building gunman. CE399 was a shallow shot to the back of JFK from high and above. I don't know what shot hit him first, the neck or back shot. Hey, I can be completely wrong on this, but those are my thoughts on this for years now.
×
×
  • Create New...