Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Well, you know, I have interviewed Jones Harris on "The Real Deal". Billy confirmed to him that he was wearing the red-and-white, vertically striped short-sleeved shirt in which he was photographed by the FBI. Here is the interview, which you can listen to and verify yourself: With Jones Harris And if it was BUTTONED UP TO THE TOP, that is ADDITIONAL PROOF THAT LOVELADY WASN'T DOORMAN! Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? Come clean, Robin. Admit that Doorman was not Lovelady or Gorilla Man but Lee Oswald! Edited March 1, 2013 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I also note that lovelady made no mention of short sleeves in CE-1408 And that in the FBI photos he doesn't have his shirt buttoned at the neck ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Quote: Robin asks, "Where was Billy?" But we have figured out where he was. Oh yeh that's right ! They turned him into a black Hole. You asked where to find Billy. We have located him. Did you think that they would leave him conspicuous when they had to obfuscate the presence of the "lone assassin" in the doorway by alleging it was Billy? I am having a hard time taking you seriously, Robin. Why have you turned into a seriously muddled thinker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) I also note that lovelady made no mention of short sleeves in CE-1408 And that in the FBI photos he doesn't have his shirt buttoned at the neck ? Egad, man! THEY HAD THE PHOTOGRAPHS. I personally doubt that he actually did have his shirt BUTTONED TO THE TOP, but as I have already explained, THAT WOULD MAKE IT ALLTHE WORSE FOR YOU. Haven't you noticed that Doorman DOESN'T HAVE HIS SHIRT BUTTONED TO THE TOP? Why are you turning yourself into a fool HERE on this forum? You are disintegrating before our eyes. Edited March 1, 2013 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Quote: Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? I post the evidence as i see it, if it contradicts my own position so be it. Do you think i don't know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 In CE-1408 Lovelady said that the woman shielding her eyes from the sun worked on the second floor of the TSBD Is he refering to your "Black Hole" entity ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Quote: Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? I post the evidence as i see it, if it contradicts my own position so be it. Do you think i don't know that. Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO Why are you running away from the obvious? What's the problem? You asked me where Billy was standing. We have shown you where. The woman shielding her eyes from the sun is JUST BELOW BILLY. You are displaying a degree of irrationality that is simply STUNNING. Edited March 1, 2013 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) What you call a muddled thinker. Is me working through the various pieces of evidence,digesting it piece by piece, analyzing it, and coming to a conclusion. You are trying to convert me to the dark side It won't happen Jim Edited March 1, 2013 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Unger Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Quote: Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? I post the evidence as i see it, if it contradicts my own position so be it. Do you think i don't know that. Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO Why are you running away from the obvious? What's the problem? You asked me where Billy was standing. We have shown you where. The woman shielding her eyes from the sun is JUST BELOW BILLY. You are displaying a degree of irrationality that is simply STUNNING. The small woman isn't in the doorway area, or standing on the steps she is of no consequence. ARE YOU SURE YOUR BLACK HOLE PERSON WITH BOTH ARMS SHIELDING THE EYES ISN'T A WOMAN ??? SINCE THE ENTITY HAS NO FACE YOU CAN'T REALLY BE SURE CAN YOU JIM. ??? Edited March 1, 2013 by Robin Unger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Robin, I really think you're wasting your time, there's a better chance of a Communist lesbian pagan getting elected POTUS than Fetzer admitting error, let alone changing his mind and I doubt any fence sitters will benefit from further discussion. Just my $ 0.02 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Quote: Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? I post the evidence as i see it, if it contradicts my own position so be it. Do you think i don't know that. Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO Why are you running away from the obvious? What's the problem? You asked me where Billy was standing. We have shown you where. The woman shielding her eyes from the sun is JUST BELOW BILLY. You are displaying a degree of irrationality that is simply STUNNING. The small woman isn't in the doorway area, or standing on the steps she is of no consequence. ARE YOU SURE YOUR BLACK HOLE PERSON WITH BOTH ARMS SHIELDING THE EYES ISN'T A WOMAN ??? SINCE THE ENTITY HAS NO FACE YOU CAN'T REALLY BE SURE CAN YOU JIM. ??? You are being childish. We have presented proof that Doorman was Oswald, that Doorman was not Lovelady, and that Doorman was not the Gorilla Man. The evidence is clear and compelling. It is not a mathematical proof, because that is not possible in case of this kind. We are dealing with physical phenomena, including films and photographs, which have obviously been altered and changed. The question is, "What happened?" We know that Billy went to the FBI and showed them the shirt that he was wearing. It was a red-and-white, vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. The photographed the shirt and sent the photos with their formal report to FBI Headquarters and (my inference) hoped that Edgar wouldn't notice that the evidence they had sent actually refuted the claim that Lovelady was Doorman rather than confirmed it. Read the letter for yourself. We have also shown that the man in the checkered shirt cannot have been Doorman. The shirt is buttoned up to the neck, while Doorman's shirt is splayed open. The pattern does not resemble the shirt on Doorman; the body type is far more robust; and the man looks like a gorilla. It is not rocket science to observe that he is not Billy Lovelady. It follows that neither Billy nor Gorilla Man is the man in the doorway. It was Oswald. A conclusion in science is acceptable as true when it (1) has a higher likelihood than its alternatives and (2) the evidence has "settled down". The likelihood of an hypothesis h, given evidence e, equals the probability of e if h were true. If Billy were Doorman, then Doorman would have been wearing a red-and-white vertically striped shirt. But that is not the shirt he is wearing. So the probability of e, given Billy as h, equals ZERO. If the man in the checkered shirt were Doorman, then Doorman would have been wearing a checkered shirt, it would have been buttoned up to the top, and he would have been bursting out of his clothing. None of that is true of Doorman. The probability of e, given checkered shirt man as h, likewise equals ZERO. Neither the Lovelady hypothesis nor the Gorilla Man hypothesis is consistent with the evidence. They cannot be correct. But the shirt that Oswald was wearing bears striking similarity to the shirt on Doorman. Likewise, the build of Doorman and the t-shirt he was wearing are remarkably like those of Oswald. The face has been altered to make it appear more like Lovelady's face, but it still looks a great deal like Lee's face. The probability of the evidence, which has been confirmed by further study and has "settled down", if it was Lee, is VERY HIGH. Since an hypothesis in science is preferable to its alternatives when it has the higher likelihood, given the available evidence, as long as high probability is higher than zero, the Oswald hypothesis is preferable. Since additional studies have confirmed 27 features identifying Lee's shirt with Doorman's, the evidence has "settled down" and the hypothesis is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science. As for the location of other figures, they appear to have made several moves to obfuscate the presence of the patsy in the photograph, which did not actually go out until the following morning. It was an intricate job, where they did not do it perfectly. The obfuscated face, the missing shoulder, a figure both in front of and behind Doorman at the same time--not to mention the odd black man's profile--are proof of its alteration. There would have been no reason to alter the photograph unless someone had been there who should not have been there. The obvious candidate is Oswald. But he had told Fritz he was "out with Bill Shelley in front". So they had to remove his image, too, which they appear to have done by obfuscation. And, since Billy was going to be their substitute, they had to make his presence similarly obscure, which was also done. Edited March 1, 2013 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Robin, I really think you're wasting your time, there's a better chance of a Communist lesbian pagan getting elected POTUS than Fetzer admitting error, let alone changing his mind and I doubt any fence sitters will benefit from further discussion. Just my $ 0.02 This is typical Colby. No logic. No evidence. Just a crappy ad hominem of the kind for which he is known. I have not simply made a claim but have actually proven that Doorman was Oswald, that he was not Lovelady, and that he also cannot have been Gorilla Man. It is not my reason and rationality that is in doubt, but that of Robin Unger and others. Robin Unger, for God's sake, is not even willing to commit himself to the obvious answers to two simple questions: Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO Surely I am not the only one to observe that he is not being candid or else has lost his cognitive reasoning capacities. If Colby wants to dispute my conclusion, then let him explain what I have wrong and how he knows. But of course he is not going to do that. He has never done that. And his petty posts will continue unabated, on and on and on. The posts that are dedicated to sorting this out on the basis of logic and evidence are mine, not his or Robin Unger's. Edited March 1, 2013 by James H. Fetzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) Quote: Your own evidence contradicts your own position. Can't you see that? I post the evidence as i see it, if it contradicts my own position so be it. Do you think i don't know that. Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO Why are you running away from the obvious? What's the problem? You asked me where Billy was standing. We have shown you where. The woman shielding her eyes from the sun is JUST BELOW BILLY. You are displaying a degree of irrationality that is simply STUNNING. The small woman isn't in the doorway area, or standing on the steps she is of no consequence. ARE YOU SURE YOUR BLACK HOLE PERSON WITH BOTH ARMS SHIELDING THE EYES ISN'T A WOMAN ??? SINCE THE ENTITY HAS NO FACE YOU CAN'T REALLY BE SURE CAN YOU JIM. ??? Robin, In the article you posted in post #86, Lovelady is quoted as saying that he was standing on the first step. He probably should have said that he was standing on the first step down from the top. --Tommy Edited March 1, 2013 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James H. Fetzer Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 It also reports that the FBI had a big discussion about it and were sure "it just had to be Oswald". They were more on top of this than you and Robin Unger. So what is your take, Thomas Graves: Is Doorman wearing a red-and-white short-sleeved shirt? YES or NO Is the shirt Doorman is wearing buttoned up to the top? YES or NO This is not rocket science, Thomas. Everyone here knows the answers to these questions. What I want to know is HOW YOU ANSWER THEM HERE. Two short questions. What are your answers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) It also reports that the FBI had a big discussion about it and were sure "it just had to be Oswald". [...] Wrong, Dr. Fetzer. The article in post # 86 doesn't say that. . In the article Lovelady is quoted as saying, "They said they had a big discussion down at the FBI and one guy said it just had to be Oswald." --Tommy (emphasis added) Edited March 1, 2013 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now