The inevitable end result of our last 56 years

[Matthew Koch]

@W. Niederhut The first step is to admit you were wrong, why can't do that? 

 

[Leslie Sharp]

2 hours ago, Kirk Gallaway said:

i make no allegations here. But another researcher here has brought to my attention the history concerning Chris's most quoted writer here,. Gustave Le Bon through just a quick researching that I suppose I could have done myself.

Here is an excerpt of his notes below.

Adolf Hitler is known to have read The Crowdand in Mein Kampf drew on the propaganda techniques proposed by Le Bon.

 

"my earlier sense that there was some European vaguely fascist ideology underlying ... there it is. 

From the wikipedia article on Le Bon: "George Lachmann Mosse claimed that fascist theories of leadership that emerged during the 1920s owed much to Le Bon's theories of crowd psychology. Adolf Hitler is known to have read The Crowdand in Mein Kampf drew on the propaganda techniques proposed by Le Bon.^[46][47] Benito Mussolinialso made a careful study of Le Bon..."

Here an article on Le Bon and Trumpism:

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/trump-le-bon-mob/493118/

etc.

Dark view of the world as you note is right. 

Thanks for this, Kirk.

Oh the irony that Mr. Koch takes offense at any insult fired at his version of Roman Catholicism yet he has no compunction inserting misogynistic remarks when his back's against the war.  (Apparently I'm a scorned woman who should take her meds.  Come to think of it, Traditionalism and misogyny go hand in glove.)

"Darling of the Dark Enlightenment: The Aristocratic & Radical Traditionalist Julius Evola" — Benjamin Welton

 . . . Here’s where [Julius] Evola’s second life becomes important. Since the advent of the Internet as a forum for open and unlimited conversation, all kinds of political wonks and esoteric thinkers have taken up Evola’s standard of Radical Traditionalism. His views and work are regularly discussed on the websites Amerika and Alternative Right, while three of his books are proudly listed on the Dark Enlightenment’s reading list under the heading of “Reactionary Thought.”

The Dark Enlightenment, which is like plenty of other “movements” strung all across the Internet, has been in the press’s eye lately. Over at Taki’s Mag, author Nicholas James Pell describes the Dark Enlightenment as “a plucky collection of backward-looking upstarts” who are unified by “hysteria and a complete inability to get the point,” while the Daily Telegraph’s Dr. Tim Stanley calls the whole mess “more tragic than it is scary.” On the Left, the Dark Enlightenment is mostly known for being racist, which, like “Right-wing,” has become a smothering blanket for “Things Leftists Would Rather Not Talk About.” The Dark Enlightenment is as hard-to-define as Evola himself, but the one thing for sure is that it does not necessarily view Fascism as a dirty word.

Writing for Standpoint in 2013, Hugo Schmidt pronounces that: “the crucial argument of the 21st century will not between Right and Left, but between the democratic Right and the fascist Right.”

https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/05/darling-dark-enlightenment-aristocratic-radical-traditionalist-julius-evola.html

I'm drawing from Welton and his site because the mission statement reads, "The Imaginative Conservative offers to our families, our communities, and the Republic, a conservatism of hope, grace, charity, gratitude and prayer."  — common ground shared with thinking liberals. 

Edited March 9, 2023 by Leslie Sharp

[Joe Bauer]

3 hours ago, Andrew Prutsok said:

I'm not certain that "commonality" you refer too ever really existed, at least not to the extent we were all taught about The Great Melting Pot that was the United States in elementary school.

Immigrants, even the ones from the "Non-Shithole Countries," as the former president referred to them, took generations to fully assimilate. There were over 1,000 German language newspapers in the country in the 1890s, nearly 200 years after Germans started arriving on these shores and still 75 years after the great immigration wave of the 1820s. These papers lingered on, with most of them shutting down due to World War I but others limped along into the 1940s. In the 1880s there were 5 German language newspapers in Cincinnati alone.

I read once that the US was the fourth largest Spanish speaking country in the world. I don't know if that's true, but I bet we were once the second largest German speaking country in the world.

My point is that even the people most of us here would recognize as sharing "commonalities"  didn't come here and just automatically become good Americans. It took generations. Who's to say the experience of the Latinos -- documented and undocumented -- will be any different?

The economic despair you reference, too, is not unique to California. Here in Montana,  in the western part of the state, partly fueled by the popularity of the Yellowstone TV series, there has been a flood of wealthy people the last several years driving home and rent prices out of the range of normal people.  Many there are sleeping in cars campers.

Don't apologize for the doom and gloom. It's appropriate.

Appreciate your sympatico response post AP.

America is in the midst of unprecedented change socially.

I know about the German immigrants history you cite and your correct proposition that it took 75 years for them to assimilate to the point of abandoning using their own language over English.

But, the Southern Border Hispanic illegal immigration event is very different in it's unprecedented massive numbers context.

Also, how much this massive illegal and poverty stricken immigrant wave has drawn on and stressed our social services, hospital and health care, school systems, jails, police, housing, etc. Busting budgets in all these major areas of social and physical infrastructure.

In just 30 years, the entire state of California ( the largest population state in the nation by far- 40 million! ) has become a Hispanic majority one.

That massive demographic change in just 30 years is truly mind boggling.

I think the true number of illegals is closer to 30 to 40 million in that time.

And whether it's the Hispanic/Catholic culture or not, this migrant wave does have a much higher birth rate than any other ethnic group.

So, including their second generation, American born children...both groups add up to well over 50 million now...and are growing exponentially.

German immigrants never comprised 20% of our population in 30 years of their coming here.

Some might say that California, Arizona and a great part of Texas are now more a nation of as much Mexican and other Central American culture, heritage and language as what we knew as mostly Anglo-American up until 1980.

That's why some refer to California as "Calexico" now.

It's a fascinating question to wonder how this is all going to play out in the years ahead.

By the way. It's a fact that the majority of our homeless population is of Caucasian and African American ethnicity.

Why is that?

Edited March 9, 2023 by Joe Bauer

[Matthew Koch]

47 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Thanks for this, Kirk.

Oh the irony that Mr. Koch takes offense at any insult fired at his version of Roman Catholicism yet he has no compunction inserting misogynistic remarks when his back's against the war.  (Apparently I'm a scorned woman who should take her meds.  Come to think of it, Traditionalism and misogyny go hand in glove.)

"Darling of the Dark Enlightenment: The Aristocratic & Radical Traditionalist Julius Evola" — Benjamin Welton

 . . . Here’s where [Julius] Evola’s second life becomes important. Since the advent of the Internet as a forum for open and unlimited conversation, all kinds of political wonks and esoteric thinkers have taken up Evola’s standard of Radical Traditionalism. His views and work are regularly discussed on the websites Amerika and Alternative Right, while three of his books are proudly listed on the Dark Enlightenment’s reading list under the heading of “Reactionary Thought.”

The Dark Enlightenment, which is like plenty of other “movements” strung all across the Internet, has been in the press’s eye lately. Over at Taki’s Mag, author Nicholas James Pell describes the Dark Enlightenment as “a plucky collection of backward-looking upstarts” who are unified by “hysteria and a complete inability to get the point,” while the Daily Telegraph’s Dr. Tim Stanley calls the whole mess “more tragic than it is scary.” On the Left, the Dark Enlightenment is mostly known for being racist, which, like “Right-wing,” has become a smothering blanket for “Things Leftists Would Rather Not Talk About.” The Dark Enlightenment is as hard-to-define as Evola himself, but the one thing for sure is that it does not necessarily view Fascism as a dirty word.

Writing for Standpoint in 2013, Hugo Schmidt pronounces that: “the crucial argument of the 21st century will not between Right and Left, but between the democratic Right and the fascist Right.”
 

 

How Traditional Catholism has anything to do with my remarks to you is bigger leaps in logic than your Trump was run by a Jewish Fascist from your afterword. As we see facts don't matter when you are biased.. 

You are a woman scorned and you aren't taking the debunking of one of the major thesis of your book well!

Your grasping on Kirk's pathetic slander attempt only confirms this. You said that you could counter my points about your book, why haven't you? You shared that Bannon article and left out the context just like you are doing here, why did I tell you to take meds?

Because you said the mods and admins were censoring the word (N)azi because they were sympathizers who were taken to that side through reading Rodger Stones Book on the JFKA.. that was the context, you are not a very honest researcher and author it seems.

Edited March 9, 2023 by Matthew Koch

[Matthew Koch]

 

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Thanks for this, Kirk.

Oh the irony that Mr. Koch takes offense at any insult fired at his version of Roman Catholicism yet he has no compunction inserting misogynistic remarks when his back's against the war.  (Apparently I'm a scorned woman who should take her meds.  Come to think of it, Traditionalism and misogyny go hand in glove.)

"Darling of the Dark Enlightenment: The Aristocratic & Radical Traditionalist Julius Evola" — Benjamin Welton

 . . . Here’s where [Julius] Evola’s second life becomes important. Since the advent of the Internet as a forum for open and unlimited conversation, all kinds of political wonks and esoteric thinkers have taken up Evola’s standard of Radical Traditionalism. His views and work are regularly discussed on the websites Amerika and Alternative Right, while three of his books are proudly listed on the Dark Enlightenment’s reading list under the heading of “Reactionary Thought.”

The Dark Enlightenment, which is like plenty of other “movements” strung all across the Internet, has been in the press’s eye lately. Over at Taki’s Mag, author Nicholas James Pell describes the Dark Enlightenment as “a plucky collection of backward-looking upstarts” who are unified by “hysteria and a complete inability to get the point,” while the Daily Telegraph’s Dr. Tim Stanley calls the whole mess “more tragic than it is scary.” On the Left, the Dark Enlightenment is mostly known for being racist, which, like “Right-wing,” has become a smothering blanket for “Things Leftists Would Rather Not Talk About.” The Dark Enlightenment is as hard-to-define as Evola himself, but the one thing for sure is that it does not necessarily view Fascism as a dirty word.

Writing for Standpoint in 2013, Hugo Schmidt pronounces that: “the crucial argument of the 21st century will not between Right and Left, but between the democratic Right and the fascist Right.”

https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/05/darling-dark-enlightenment-aristocratic-radical-traditionalist-julius-evola.html

I'm drawing from Welton and his site because the mission statement reads, "The Imaginative Conservative offers to our families, our communities, and the Republic, a conservatism of hope, grace, charity, gratitude and prayer."  — common ground shared with thinking liberals. 

Well, Leslie, this is a little embarrassing, how ironic. You gleefully told me that you represented the HL Hunt family, a neo-fascist, right wing, oil tycoon that may well have been involved in the plot to assassinate president John F. Kennedy. Has the leopard changed its spots? I am sure you are giving back the money you made from protecting a right wing, neo-fascist, in PR, right? Or is that time still a source of pride? 🙂 

Was Otto Skorzeny a former client of yours? I recall him having some interests in big oil. (sarcasm optional). 

If you were willing to work for HL Hunt, who exactly was off limits? Its incredibly hypocritical that you’ve piped up here. You’ve done exactly what Kirk is against.   
 

I quote you:

“I spent almost three decades in the field of sales, marketing and public relations working for the likes of the H. L. Hunt family, the wife of US Amb. to the Court of Saint James Henry Catto, and the reluctant billionaire Chuck Feeney of DFS, so I highly respect your perspective.” 

[Matthew Koch]

1 hour ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Thanks for this, Kirk.

Oh the irony that Mr. Koch takes offense at any insult fired at his version of Roman Catholicism yet he has no compunction inserting misogynistic remarks when his back's against the war.  (Apparently I'm a scorned woman who should take her meds.  Come to think of it, Traditionalism and misogyny go hand in glove.)

"Darling of the Dark Enlightenment: The Aristocratic & Radical Traditionalist Julius Evola" — Benjamin Welton

 . . . Here’s where [Julius] Evola’s second life becomes important. Since the advent of the Internet as a forum for open and unlimited conversation, all kinds of political wonks and esoteric thinkers have taken up Evola’s standard of Radical Traditionalism. His views and work are regularly discussed on the websites Amerika and Alternative Right, while three of his books are proudly listed on the Dark Enlightenment’s reading list under the heading of “Reactionary Thought.”

The Dark Enlightenment, which is like plenty of other “movements” strung all across the Internet, has been in the press’s eye lately. Over at Taki’s Mag, author Nicholas James Pell describes the Dark Enlightenment as “a plucky collection of backward-looking upstarts” who are unified by “hysteria and a complete inability to get the point,” while the Daily Telegraph’s Dr. Tim Stanley calls the whole mess “more tragic than it is scary.” On the Left, the Dark Enlightenment is mostly known for being racist, which, like “Right-wing,” has become a smothering blanket for “Things Leftists Would Rather Not Talk About.” The Dark Enlightenment is as hard-to-define as Evola himself, but the one thing for sure is that it does not necessarily view Fascism as a dirty word.

Writing for Standpoint in 2013, Hugo Schmidt pronounces that: “the crucial argument of the 21st century will not between Right and Left, but between the democratic Right and the fascist Right.”

https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/05/darling-dark-enlightenment-aristocratic-radical-traditionalist-julius-evola.html

I'm drawing from Welton and his site because the mission statement reads, "The Imaginative Conservative offers to our families, our communities, and the Republic, a conservatism of hope, grace, charity, gratitude and prayer."  — common ground shared with thinking liberals. 

I hadn't really looked into Evola but having taking about 1 minute to look into it, it's extremely clear that he is an occultist into mysticism.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Evola

You clearly don't know what you are talking about, try reading the wikipedia and from there try educating yourself on the what Occultism and Mystisim is and that it's what we in the church are against..

You CLEARLY don't know history and that's why I don't respect you😉 it doesn't have to do with you being a woman... 

 

Edited March 9, 2023 by Matthew Koch

[Leslie Sharp]

18 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:

 

How Traditional Catholism has anything to do with my remarks to you is bigger leaps in logic than your Trump was run by a Jewish Fascist from your afterword. As we see facts don't matter when you are biased.. 

You are a woman scorned and you aren't taking the debunking of one of the major thesis of your book well!

Your grasping on Kirk's pathetic slander attempt only confirms this. You said that you could counter my points about your book, why haven't you? You shared that Bannon article and left out the context just like you are doing here, why did I tell you to take meds? Because you said the mods and admins were censoring the word (N)azi because they were sympathizers who were taken to that side through reading Rodger Stones Book on the JFKA.. that was the context, you are not a very honest researcher and author it seems.

I'm compelled to respond to you when you make flagrantly false assertions.  You write, Because you said the mods and admins were censoring the word (N)azi because they were sympathizers who were taken to that side through reading Rodger Stones Book on the JFKA.. 

I asserted that there was a time when researchers shared Kennedy's politics and ideology, and it is unfortunate that forums have been infiltrated by those whose ideals are anathema to what he stood for. Roger Stone is in that category. 

No doubt you're aware that Stone's political career was launched with the Goldwater presidential campaign, and that the latter was the favored candidate of  the John Birch Society whose members included General Edwin Walker, a key figure in the plot to assassination Kennedy?  

It should be noted that in 1964, as presidential candidate Barry Goldwater marched toward the nomination to challenge Johnson who was destined to fill Kennedy’s shoes. . . 

Regnery Press published three pro-Goldwater campaign-focused books, including Schreiber’s which they believed would make the biggest splash. Regnery was the creation of descendants of William H. Regnery, a founder of the “America First Committee” which was formed in the 1930s in opposition to US involvement in matters it believed were strictly between Europeans and Hitler’s N-azis. More will be said about Regnery as this book comes to a close   . . .

In response to questions about the 2016 campaign and election, William “Bill” Regnery, grandson of one of the founders of the America First Committee and nephew of publisher Henry Regnery,  seemingly appreciated the archetypal role filled by Donald Trump when he reached for a word to describe the effect: “I think Trump was a legitimizer,” he argued. White nationalism “went from being a conversation you could hold in a bathroom, to the front parlor,” said Regnery. His family publishing house, Regnery Publishing’s first two titles had been critical of the Nuremberg Trials, and the third was a pro-National Socialist book attacking the Allied air campaign of WWII. By 1954, Regnery was doing its part in advancing the Cold War with publication of books for the John Birch Society. According to CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, who is cited in the Lafitte records, the agency had subsidized Regnery because of “its pro-National Socialist stance.” Hunt had been central to many CIA operations run by CIA officer Tracy Barnes. . . .

Trump’s vision of America has been narrowed to focus on and to reflect the ideas of [Steve] Bannon and [Bill] Regnery. Bill Regnery’s uncle Henry had also published "Human Events," a journal alleged by historian James Ziegler in Red Scare Racism and Cold War Black Radicalism to have been used by the CIA for smear campaigns. "Human Events" rapidly evolved as one of the standard-bearers for American conservatism, and continues to provide space to far-right provocateurs . . .

Isn't it ironic that your mentor Jack Posobiec ended up at humanevents.com?
 

And, please provide a quote from our book that includes the term Jewish Fascist? Similar to your ideological mentors — Posobiec, Carlson, Bannon and their ilk — you "summarize" to suit your extremist agenda, the same agenda behind the plot to assassinate Kennedy in Dallas.

[Leslie Sharp]

36 minutes ago, Chris Barnard said:

Well, Leslie, this is a little embarrassing, how ironic. You gleefully told me that you represented the HL Hunt family, a neo-fascist, right wing, oil tycoon that may well have been involved in the plot to assassinate president John F. Kennedy. Has the leopard changed its spots? I am sure you are giving back the money you made from protecting a right wing, neo-fascist, in PR, right? Or is that time still a source of pride? 🙂 

Was Otto Skorzeny a former client of yours? I recall him having some interests in big oil. (sarcasm optional). 

If you were willing to work for HL Hunt, who exactly was off limits? Its incredibly hypocritical that you’ve piped up here. You’ve done exactly what Kirk is against.   
 

I quote you:

“I spent almost three decades in the field of sales, marketing and public relations working for the likes of the H. L. Hunt family, the wife of US Amb. to the Court of Saint James Henry Catto, and the reluctant billionaire Chuck Feeney of DFS, so I highly respect your perspective.” 

Why do you think I'm here, Chris?  And why do you think I picked up the gauntlet in 1994 having read Dick Russell's The Man Who Knew Too Much?

I'm certainly not the one who spends time defending Jean Rene Souetre.

[Matthew Koch]

11 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

 

I'm compelled to respond to you when you make flagrantly false assertions.  You write, Because you said the mods and admins were censoring the word (N)azi because they were sympathizers who were taken to that side through reading Rodger Stones Book on the JFKA.. 

I asserted that there was a time when researchers shared Kennedy's politics and ideology, and it is unfortunate that forums have been infiltrated by those whose ideals are anathema to what he stood for. Roger Stone is in that category. 

No doubt you're aware that Stone's political career was launched with the Goldwater presidential campaign, and that the latter was the favored candidate of  the John Birch Society whose members included General Edwin Walker, a key figure in the plot to assassination Kennedy?  

It should be noted that in 1964, as presidential candidate Barry Goldwater marched toward the nomination to challenge Johnson who was destined to fill Kennedy’s shoes. . . 

Regnery Press published three pro-Goldwater campaign-focused books, including Schreiber’s which they believed would make the biggest splash. Regnery was the creation of descendants of William H. Regnery, a founder of the “America First Committee” which was formed in the 1930s in opposition to US involvement in matters it believed were strictly between Europeans and Hitler’s N-azis. More will be said about Regnery as this book comes to a close   . . .

In response to questions about the 2016 campaign and election, William “Bill” Regnery, grandson of one of the founders of the America First Committee and nephew of publisher Henry Regnery,  seemingly appreciated the archetypal role filled by Donald Trump when he reached for a word to describe the effect: “I think Trump was a legitimizer,” he argued. White nationalism “went from being a conversation you could hold in a bathroom, to the front parlor,” said Regnery. His family publishing house, Regnery Publishing’s first two titles had been critical of the Nuremberg Trials, and the third was a pro-National Socialist book attacking the Allied air campaign of WWII. By 1954, Regnery was doing its part in advancing the Cold War with publication of books for the John Birch Society. According to CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, who is cited in the Lafitte records, the agency had subsidized Regnery because of “its pro-National Socialist stance.” Hunt had been central to many CIA operations run by CIA officer Tracy Barnes. . . .

Trump’s vision of America has been narrowed to focus on and to reflect the ideas of [Steve] Bannon and [Bill] Regnery. Bill Regnery’s uncle Henry had also published "Human Events," a journal alleged by historian James Ziegler in Red Scare Racism and Cold War Black Radicalism to have been used by the CIA for smear campaigns. "Human Events" rapidly evolved as one of the standard-bearers for American conservatism, and continues to provide space to far-right provocateurs . . .

Isn't it ironic that your mentor Jack Posobiec ended up at humanevents.com?
 

And, please provide a quote from our book that includes the term Jewish Fascist? Similar to your ideological mentors — Posobiec, Carlson, Bannon and their ilk — you "summarize" to suit your extremist agenda, the same agenda behind the plot to assassinate Kennedy in Dallas.

Can you quote anyone who you mentioned about saying something like this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39371715

You don't know the difference between far right and Fascist but that makes sense given that you literally work for the people you call fascists, LMAO what does that make you? 

[Matthew Koch]

 

[Leslie Sharp]

5 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

 

I'm compelled to respond to you when you make flagrantly false assertions.  You write, Because you said the mods and admins were censoring the word (N)azi because they were sympathizers who were taken to that side through reading Rodger Stones Book on the JFKA.. 

I asserted that there was a time when researchers shared Kennedy's politics and ideology, and it is unfortunate that forums have been infiltrated by those whose ideals are anathema to what he stood for. Roger Stone is in that category. 

No doubt you're aware that Stone's political career was launched with the Goldwater presidential campaign, and that the latter was the favored candidate of  the John Birch Society whose members included General Edwin Walker, a key figure in the plot to assassination Kennedy?  

It should be noted that in 1964, as presidential candidate Barry Goldwater marched toward the nomination to challenge Johnson who was destined to fill Kennedy’s shoes. . . 

Regnery Press published three pro-Goldwater campaign-focused books, including Schreiber’s which they believed would make the biggest splash. Regnery was the creation of descendants of William H. Regnery, a founder of the “America First Committee” which was formed in the 1930s in opposition to US involvement in matters it believed were strictly between Europeans and Hitler’s N-azis. More will be said about Regnery as this book comes to a close   . . .

In response to questions about the 2016 campaign and election, William “Bill” Regnery, grandson of one of the founders of the America First Committee and nephew of publisher Henry Regnery,  seemingly appreciated the archetypal role filled by Donald Trump when he reached for a word to describe the effect: “I think Trump was a legitimizer,” he argued. White nationalism “went from being a conversation you could hold in a bathroom, to the front parlor,” said Regnery. His family publishing house, Regnery Publishing’s first two titles had been critical of the Nuremberg Trials, and the third was a pro-National Socialist book attacking the Allied air campaign of WWII. By 1954, Regnery was doing its part in advancing the Cold War with publication of books for the John Birch Society. According to CIA agent E. Howard Hunt, who is cited in the Lafitte records, the agency had subsidized Regnery because of “its pro-National Socialist stance.” Hunt had been central to many CIA operations run by CIA officer Tracy Barnes. . . .

Trump’s vision of America has been narrowed to focus on and to reflect the ideas of [Steve] Bannon and [Bill] Regnery. Bill Regnery’s uncle Henry had also published "Human Events," a journal alleged by historian James Ziegler in Red Scare Racism and Cold War Black Radicalism to have been used by the CIA for smear campaigns. "Human Events" rapidly evolved as one of the standard-bearers for American conservatism, and continues to provide space to far-right provocateurs . . .

Isn't it ironic that your mentor Jack Posobiec ended up at humanevents.com?
 

And, please provide a quote from our book that includes the term Jewish Fascist? Similar to your ideological mentors — Posobiec, Carlson, Bannon and their ilk — you "summarize" to suit your extremist agenda, the same agenda behind the plot to assassinate Kennedy in Dallas.

It was Bill Regnery who philosophically and financially mentored what became known in the mid-2000s as the “alt-right.” Avowed Neo-National Socialist Richard Spencer served as his spokesman. While at Duke University, Spencer had brushed against a future advisor to the 45^th president, Stephen Miller, who would later serve as aid to Senator and future Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Together, the two archconservatives formulated the idea of “nation-state populism”, an economic nationalist movement modeled on the populism of Andrew Jackson, the senator from Tennessee before becoming the seventh president of the United States whose harsh policies toward enslaved people and Native Americans are a blight on America’s past. Nation-state populism would greatly influence the Trump anti-immigration campaign.

 

I'm sure you agree that Jack Posobiec comes across as a wannabe sidekick of Richard Spencer.

Most Europeans recognize a Fascist when he arrives on the scene . . . in fact didn't a powerful block of rational, educated Italians run Bannon out of town?

Richard B. Spencer: The founder of alt-right presents racism in a chic new outfit — European Center for Populism Studies, June 28, 2021
. . . In 2010, he [Richard Spencer] founded AlternativeRight.com, a white supremacy-themed webzine aimed at the “intellectual right-wing,” (SPLC, n.d.). The site caught the attention of the conservative publisher William Regnery II, who had tried to start a whites-only online dating service and funded the white nationalist National Policy Institute (NPI). With Regnery’s backing (Harkinson, 2016), Spencer became president of NPI in 2011, following the death of its chairman. Concurrently, he also oversaw NPI’s publishing division, Washington Summit Publishers, home of such scientifically bogus works as a 2015 reissue of Richard Lynn’s Race Differences in Intelligence and screeds by other white nationalists, including Jared Taylor, editor of the racist American Renaissance journal, and Sam Francis, the late editor of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens’ newsletter (SPLC, n.d.).

https://www.populismstudies.org/richard-b-spencer-the-founder-of-alt-right-presents-racism-in-a-chic-new-outfit/

[Leslie Sharp]

13 minutes ago, Matthew Koch said:

Can you quote anyone who you mentioned about saying something like this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39371715

You don't know the difference between far right and Fascist but that makes sense given that you literally work for the people you call fascists, LMAO what does that make you? 

 

I'm sure you agree that Jack Posobiec comes across as a wannabe sidekick of Richard Spencer.

It was Bill Regnery who philosophically and financially mentored what became known in the mid-2000s as the “alt-right.” Avowed Neo-National Socialist Richard Spencer served as his spokesman. While at Duke University, Spencer had brushed against a future advisor to the 45^th president, Stephen Miller, who would later serve as aid to Senator and future Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Together, the two archconservatives formulated the idea of “nation-state populism”, an economic nationalist movement modeled on the populism of Andrew Jackson, the senator from Tennessee before becoming the seventh president of the United States whose harsh policies toward enslaved people and Native Americans are a blight on America’s past. Nation-state populism would greatly influence the Trump anti-immigration campaign.

Most Europeans recognize a Fascist when he arrives on the scene . . . in fact didn't a powerful block of rational, educated Italians run Bannon out of town?

Richard B. Spencer: The founder of alt-right presents racism in a chic new outfit — European Center for Populism Studies, June 28, 2021
. . . In 2010, he [Richard Spencer] founded AlternativeRight.com, a white supremacy-themed webzine aimed at the “intellectual right-wing,” (SPLC, n.d.). The site caught the attention of the conservative publisher William Regnery II, who had tried to start a whites-only online dating service and funded the white nationalist National Policy Institute (NPI). With Regnery’s backing (Harkinson, 2016), Spencer became president of NPI in 2011, following the death of its chairman. Concurrently, he also oversaw NPI’s publishing division, Washington Summit Publishers, home of such scientifically bogus works as a 2015 reissue of Richard Lynn’s Race Differences in Intelligence and screeds by other white nationalists, including Jared Taylor, editor of the racist American Renaissance journal, and Sam Francis, the late editor of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens’ newsletter (SPLC, n.d.).

https://www.populismstudies.org/richard-b-spencer-the-founder-of-alt-right-presents-racism-in-a-chic-new-outfit/

[Guest]

2 hours ago, Matthew Koch said:

@W. Niederhut The first step is to admit you were wrong, why can't do that? 

 

You’re hoping for a miracle here, of the magnitude of Moses parting the Red Sea. I can’t even get William to read psychologist Joost Meerloo’s “rape of the mind”. He’s worried he’ll discover that his mind has been raped. 🙈

[Matthew Koch]

4 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

 

I'm sure you agree that Jack Posobiec comes across as a wannabe sidekick of Richard Spencer.

It was Bill Regnery who philosophically and financially mentored what became known in the mid-2000s as the “alt-right.” Avowed Neo-National Socialist Richard Spencer served as his spokesman. While at Duke University, Spencer had brushed against a future advisor to the 45^th president, Stephen Miller, who would later serve as aid to Senator and future Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Together, the two archconservatives formulated the idea of “nation-state populism”, an economic nationalist movement modeled on the populism of Andrew Jackson, the senator from Tennessee before becoming the seventh president of the United States whose harsh policies toward enslaved people and Native Americans are a blight on America’s past. Nation-state populism would greatly influence the Trump anti-immigration campaign.

Most Europeans recognize a Fascist when he arrives on the scene . . . in fact didn't a powerful block of rational, educated Italians run Bannon out of town?

Richard B. Spencer: The founder of alt-right presents racism in a chic new outfit — European Center for Populism Studies, June 28, 2021
. . . In 2010, he [Richard Spencer] founded AlternativeRight.com, a white supremacy-themed webzine aimed at the “intellectual right-wing,” (SPLC, n.d.). The site caught the attention of the conservative publisher William Regnery II, who had tried to start a whites-only online dating service and funded the white nationalist National Policy Institute (NPI). With Regnery’s backing (Harkinson, 2016), Spencer became president of NPI in 2011, following the death of its chairman. Concurrently, he also oversaw NPI’s publishing division, Washington Summit Publishers, home of such scientifically bogus works as a 2015 reissue of Richard Lynn’s Race Differences in Intelligence and screeds by other white nationalists, including Jared Taylor, editor of the racist American Renaissance journal, and Sam Francis, the late editor of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens’ newsletter (SPLC, n.d.).

https://www.populismstudies.org/richard-b-spencer-the-founder-of-alt-right-presents-racism-in-a-chic-new-outfit/

You don't really know much about anything do you? The fact that you are quoting the SPLC shows how pathetically biased you are!! 

 

https://www.newsweek.com/white-nationalist-richard-spencer-votes-joe-biden-hell-libertarian-ideology-1544572

White nationalist Richard Spencer voted for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, according to a Tuesday photo on Spencer's Twitter feed.