Chris Davidson Posted August 7, 2023 Author Share Posted August 7, 2023 Moving it under one umbrella: https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27278-the-harvard-crimson-admits-we-debunked-ce-399/?do=findComment&comment=509779https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27278-the-harvard-crimson-admits-we-debunked-ce-399/?do=findComment&comment=509995https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/27278-the-harvard-crimson-admits-we-debunked-ce-399/?do=findComment&comment=510206 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 A limo before its time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 25 Author Share Posted February 25 On 2/22/2024 at 1:55 PM, Chris Davidson said: A limo before its time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Reeves Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 11 hours ago, Chris Davidson said: Hey Chris, I'm guessing the truck passing down Elm was filmed by you? if so: do you remember if your recreation fully zoomed at the time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 26 Author Share Posted February 26 The truck footage was not full zoom. Here are two that were: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Reeves Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 thanks @Chris Davidson btw, Had you spotted something incorrect about the Z-film that motivated you to get a Bell & Howell and try it yourself? I haven't seen any other recreation attempts using the same camera. I'm glad you posted them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 Didn't care for the crop in the extant film. Others have recreated with the same camera: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 27 Author Share Posted June 27 You need to reconsider your sync calculations: On 6/24/2024 at 4:03 AM, Chris Scally said: It was not until one of the HSCA contractors who examined the Nix film used the Itek 1967 numbering system again in 1978 that it was possible to establish what the Itek system actually meant. From a careful study of HSCA internal documents, I have been able to calculate that the Itek numbering system was as follows: Nix 191 = A; Nix 192 = A1; Nix 193 = A2 … Nix 199 = A8; Nix 200 = B1; Nix 201 = B2; Nix 202 = B3; Nix 203 = B4 … Nix 207 = B8; Nix 208 = B9; Nix 209 = C; Nix 210 = C1; Nix 211 = C2 (the head shot); Nix 212 = C3 … Nix 218 = C9; Nix 219 = D; Nix 220 = D1; Nix 221 = D2, and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now