Paul Cummings Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Gerry Down said: Other than Marina said he stored the rifle in the Paine garage but on Nov 22nd was no longer found to be there but on the 6th floor of the tsbd. Now you're switching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Down Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 We could apply the same logic the other way around: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll No evidence of a gunman in the daltex building No evidence the throat wound was an entry wound (some doctors, who were not forensic pathologist, thinking it might be is not evidence) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Cummings Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 2 hours ago, Gerry Down said: We could apply the same logic the other way around: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll No evidence of a gunman in the daltex building No evidence the throat wound was an entry wound (some doctors, who were not forensic pathologist, thinking it might be is not evidence) That's not the intent of the thread nor is it to satisfy your whims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 There is no evidence of a gunman on the knoll? What the heck is Sam Holland about then? What the heck is Bowers about then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Down Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 1 hour ago, James DiEugenio said: There is no evidence of a gunman on the knoll? What the heck is Sam Holland about then? What the heck is Bowers about then? I'm applying Gil Jesus' high standard of "evidence" which does not allow for circumstantial evidence etc. For example, name a single witness who saw a rifle on the knoll. What was their description of the rifle? Without a rifle you can't have a rifleman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pat Speer Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 5 hours ago, Gerry Down said: We could apply the same logic the other way around: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll No evidence of a gunman in the daltex building No evidence the throat wound was an entry wound (some doctors, who were not forensic pathologist, thinking it might be is not evidence) The last claim is deceptive. While there is no proof it was an entry wound, there is eyewitness evidence supporting that it was small--too small to have been an exit for a high velocity bullet. It follows then that it was either an exit of a bullet or fragment traveling at a low velocity, or an entrance for a bullet whose exit or lack of exit remains a mystery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gil Jesus Posted July 10, 2023 Author Share Posted July 10, 2023 10 hours ago, Gerry Down said: We could apply the same logic the other way around: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll No evidence of a gunman in the daltex building No evidence the throat wound was an entry wound (some doctors, who were not forensic pathologist, thinking it might be is not evidence) Since you want to mention the medical evidence... no evidence of a transiting bullet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gil Jesus Posted July 10, 2023 Author Share Posted July 10, 2023 10 hours ago, Paul Cummings said: No evidence that Oswald went to Irving on the evening of the 21st to retrieve a rifle. That's true. In fact, there's evidence Oswald went to Irving on the evening of the 21st to make up for a fight he had over the phone with his wife the weekend before. https://gil-jesus.com/the-real-reason-oswald-went-to-irving-on-11-21/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gil Jesus Posted July 10, 2023 Author Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, Gerry Down said: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll Au contraire, mon frere. All of this corroborating evidence ignored by your Warren Commission. The witness who showed where a man was located behind the fence and the witness who saw a man running behind the fence and was never called to testify. Why not ? Evidence of someone behind the fence, a man seen running behind the fence after the shots were fired and corroborating evidence that there was smoke from the picket fence. Not to mention the witnesses who said that at least one shot that hit Kennedy was fired from the front. Yeah there's no evidence of a gunman on the knoll. Edited July 10, 2023 by Gil Jesus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Blackmon Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) 13 hours ago, Gerry Down said: We could apply the same logic the other way around: No evidence of a gunman on the knoll No evidence of a gunman in the daltex building No evidence the throat wound was an entry wound (some doctors, who were not forensic pathologist, thinking it might be is not evidence) Since when do your opinions involve logic? Edited July 10, 2023 by Charles Blackmon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Down Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Gil, what you don't seem to understand is that a person can be convicted in court for murder on circumstantial evidence alone if there is lots of it. You seem to require absolutist evidence at every turn in the JFK case for the conviction of LHO while at the same time purporting there to be a conspiracy, of some unknown description, based on forced evidence that would struggle to meet the criteria of even circumstantial evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now