Jump to content
The Education Forum

JFK Researcher and AI Specialist Keyvan Shahrdar Dissects Recent Claims on Trump, Drawing Parallels with JFK's Assassination


Keyvan Shahrdar

Recommended Posts

I will be releasing this soon.  I would like your brutally honest comments so I can be ready.

f5bc00fd3f7433e45699391dcb225611c6-30-ge
September 9, 2023 — Shreveport, LA

In the wake of Tucker Carlson's remarks about a potential assassination of former President Donald Trump, Keyvan Shahrdar, a JFK assassination researcher and renowned AI specialist, delivers an exhaustive analysis, drawing parallels with the circumstances of JFK's assassination.

Carlson, a former Fox News host known for his far-right views, made these assertions during an interview with comedian and podcaster Adam Carolla. His statements have sparked considerable attention, particularly within liberal and conservative circles.

Venturing into historical depths, Shahrdar highlights the tense relationships President John F. Kennedy maintained with military leaders during his presidency. Kennedy's inclination toward diplomacy and his frequent resistance to more aggressive stances suggested by his military advisors often resulted in tensions.

Shahrdar points to the purported involvement of Curtis Lemay, a pivotal figure in the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1963. By 1968, Lemay had joined forces with Alabama Governor George Wallace as the vice-presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, a group recognized for its pro-segregation views. Shahrdar suggests that Lemay and his associates leveraged these racial divisions to infiltrate the already racially-biased Secret Service.

Building on this narrative, Shahrdar highlights JFK's pioneering decision to appoint Abraham Bolden to the White House detail in 1960. This move faced resistance, largely due to the prevailing racial biases within the Secret Service. Following this appointment, and in conjunction with JFK's push for desegregation at both the University of Mississippi (often referred to as "Ole Miss") and the University of Alabama—where, in June 1963, Governor George Wallace infamously blocked two black students from entering—Shahrdar posits that the stage was set for the generals' infiltration.

Shahrdar further underscores the mysterious circumstances surrounding the death of JFK's designated limousine driver, Thomas Shipman, a mere six weeks before the assassination, and the ensuing appointment of William Greer in his stead. A close examination of Greer's testimony to the Warren Commission, juxtaposed with insights from the Zapruder and Orville Nix films, strongly indicates Greer's complicity in the assassination scheme. This suspicion is amplified by Greer's decision to noticeably slow the limousine, allowing Secret Service Agent Clint Hill to swiftly approach and climb aboard.

"If Donald Trump were to meet such a fate," Shahrdar commented, "it would likely implicate a covert alliance between the Pentagon's Generals and the Secret Service, mirroring the murky details of JFK's assassination."

Shahrdar, with his keen analytical prowess, challenges the findings of the Warren Commission. He asserts that inherent political biases prevent an objective assessment. "Had the CIA orchestrated JFK's assassination, any involved would have faced swift retribution from the generals by the evening of November 22, 1963. If the Mob had been implicated, they would have faced immediate government retaliation. Involvement of Castro or the Soviets would have plunged us into WWIII. The only entities capable of executing such a plot with impunity are the Generals of the Joint Chiefs of Staff," Shahrdar stated.

Readers keen on delving deeper into Shahrdar's computer science research, or those intrigued by his revolutionary work in artificial intelligence, are encouraged to visit ChatbotCPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

I will be releasing this soon.  I would like your brutally honest comments so I can be ready.

f5bc00fd3f7433e45699391dcb225611c6-30-ge
September 9, 2023 — Shreveport, LA

In the wake of Tucker Carlson's remarks about a potential assassination of former President Donald Trump, Keyvan Shahrdar, a JFK assassination researcher and renowned AI specialist, delivers an exhaustive analysis, drawing parallels with the circumstances of JFK's assassination.

The only people who want to see Trump whacked are right wingers like Carlson.  Such an event solves their “Trump Problem” — electoral disaster in ‘24 where the likely Republican candidate will likely have multiple felony convictions.  Instead, he’d be the Martyred Hero Who Died For Us — Tucker’s wet dream.  

The last assassination of an American politician by conspiracy was Rep. Leo Ryan at Jonestown in 1978.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:

Would a military-style ambush of a motorcade in 2023 Dealey Plaza be feasible given the cameras everyone has?

I would think in a government sponsored assassination of Trump would involve the generals and the secret service.  It doubt it would be with gunfire, probably poison or bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

I would think in a government sponsored assassination of Trump would involve the generals and the secret service.  It doubt it would be with gunfire, probably poison or bomb.

The US Gov’t has long been faction-ridden. There are factions in the military hostile to Trump and a whole lot who worship him.  Same with every American law enforcement/intel/military institution.

There is no one in the Biden Administration who’d seek to whack Trump.  They are all settled in front of cable news with popcorn digging the indictments.  The scenario is senseless.

Much more plausible is a Republican faction with The Deep State plotting to take that stone out of their shoe.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2024-donors/

<q>

According to the Times' Rebecca Davis O’Brien, "Many of the Republican Party’s wealthiest donors share that view, and the growing sense of urgency about the state of the G.O.P. presidential primary race," adding, "That has left major Republican donors — whose desires have increasingly diverged from those of conservative voters — grappling with the reality that the tens of millions of dollars they have spent to try to stop the former president, fearing he poses a mortal threat to their party and the country, may already be a sunk cost."

O'Brien wrote that interviews with donors, fundraisers and insiders, "revealed hand-wringing, magical thinking, calls to arms and, for some, fatalism."

</q>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:

The US Gov’t has long been faction-ridden. There are factions in the military hostile to Trump and a whole lot who worship him.  Same with every American law enforcement/intel/military institution.

There is no one in the Biden Administration who’d seek to whack Trump.  They are all settled in front of cable news with popcorn digging the indictments.  The scenario is senseless.

Much more plausible is a Republican faction with The Deep State plotting to take that stone out of their shoe.

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2024-donors/

<q>

According to the Times' Rebecca Davis O’Brien, "Many of the Republican Party’s wealthiest donors share that view, and the growing sense of urgency about the state of the G.O.P. presidential primary race," adding, "That has left major Republican donors — whose desires have increasingly diverged from those of conservative voters — grappling with the reality that the tens of millions of dollars they have spent to try to stop the former president, fearing he poses a mortal threat to their party and the country, may already be a sunk cost."

O'Brien wrote that interviews with donors, fundraisers and insiders, "revealed hand-wringing, magical thinking, calls to arms and, for some, fatalism."

</q>

The parallels worth examining are Trump's reluctance to back the generals in their calls for foreign interventions. This pattern was evident throughout his tenure; he often resisted military recommendations. If there were ever an attempt on his life, it would likely necessitate collaboration between the generals and the Secret Service to orchestrate such an act. While it's unclear what grievances the Secret Service might hold against him, it's conceivable that the generals might have an ally within the Secret Service ranks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is very disturbing and probably should not be allowed. Everyone posting here will likely be investigated and added to government watch lists. Furthermore, this is quite excessively morbid. Whatever one thinks of Trump, good or bad, we must never wish any harm, much less mortal injury, upon him or anyone else in this world. It's just not right.

That said, I think the best method would be to sabotage his escalator, so that when he's going down it suddenly reverses direction and picks up speed. Then he would fall down the stairs. Theoretically, the speed of the upward movement of the escalator could be matched to the velocity in which he's falling, resulting in one long, continuous fall where he never reaches the bottom. Thumpity thumpity thump thump thump thumpity thumpity thump thumpity thunk thu-thunk thu-thunk thunk thunk thunk ect. He just keeps falling down the stairs, end over end, for hours and hours and hours and hours, until the sheer repetition of multiple impacts reduces his body to a fine pâté.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

The parallels worth examining are Trump's reluctance to back the generals in their calls for foreign interventions.

What gives you that idea?  Trump pulled out of the Iran nuke deal and whacked their #2 guy — clearly inviting war.  Trump bombed the hell out of Somalia and backed the Saudi actions in Yemen.  Leveled Raqqa.  He moved the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.  His treaty with the Taliban proved to be utterly insincere.

3 hours ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

This pattern was evident throughout his tenure; he often resisted military recommendations.

See above.  

 

 

 

Edited by Cliff Varnell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:

Keyvan, this may be useful.

The Skull and Bones wing of The Deep State probably whacked JFK, imo.

The people who hate Trump the most are establishment Republicans.

May I posit a scenario where Bushes did both?

Yes, Donald Trump's relationship with some of the military's top leaders was often characterized as tense during his tenure as President. Several instances highlighted these tensions:

James Mattis: Trump's first Secretary of Defense, General James Mattis, resigned in December 2018, citing differences in viewpoints with the President. Mattis's resignation letter emphasized the importance of allies and suggested that Trump did not value these alliances as much.

John Kelly: General John Kelly, who served as Trump's Chief of Staff, reportedly had disagreements with Trump on various issues. After leaving the White House, Kelly made statements that were critical of Trump's policies and actions.

H.R. McMaster: Trump's second National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, also reportedly had a strained relationship with Trump, particularly over policy in Afghanistan and Russia.

Syria Withdrawal: Trump's decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria in 2019 was met with resistance from military leaders and led to Mattis's resignation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

Yes, Donald Trump's relationship with some of the military's top leaders was often characterized as tense during his tenure as President. Several instances highlighted these tensions:

James Mattis: Trump's first Secretary of Defense, General James Mattis, resigned in December 2018, citing differences in viewpoints with the President.

Trump insisted on personal loyalty from everyone who worked for him.  Within days he called James Comey of the FBI — the man most responsible for Hillary’s defeat — to dinner and asked for his personal loyalty.  This is contrary to American government tradition — people swear allegiance to the Constitution, not one man.  That’s a fascist dictatorship.

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

 

Mattis's resignation letter emphasized the importance of allies and suggested that Trump did not value these alliances as much.

Trump wanted to pull out of NATO and be the apple of Putin’s eye.  Yes, that alienated the military brass and they kept him bottled up.   But neo-con war hawks loved his Middle East policies.

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

John Kelly: General John Kelly, who served as Trump's Chief of Staff, reportedly had disagreements with Trump on various issues. After leaving the White House, Kelly made statements that were critical of Trump's policies and actions.

90% of the people who worked for Trump are critical.

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

H.R. McMaster: Trump's second National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, also reportedly had a strained relationship with Trump, particularly over policy in Afghanistan and Russia.

And they’re going to whack the 4 times indicted, civilly convicted rapist for that?

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

Syria Withdrawal: Trump's decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria in 2019 was met with resistance from military leaders and led to Mattis's resignation.

They ignored his orders.  As a motive for assassination it’s weak sauce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cliff Varnell said:

Trump insisted on personal loyalty from everyone who worked for him.  Within days he called James Comey of the FBI — the man most responsible for Hillary’s defeat — to dinner and asked for his personal loyalty.  This is contrary to American government tradition — people swear allegiance to the Constitution, not one man.  That’s a fascist dictatorship.

Trump wanted to pull out of NATO and be the apple of Putin’s eye.  Yes, that alienated the military brass and they kept him bottled up.   But neo-con war hawks loved his Middle East policies.

90% of the people who worked for Trump are critical.

And they’re going to whack the 4 times indicted, civilly convicted rapist for that?

They ignored his orders.  As a motive for assassination it’s weak sauce.

I think what this shows a clear indication the military does not like him.  If there was an assassination it would come from the generals and the secret service.  They are the only group that can kill a president and get away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

I think what this shows a clear indication the military does not like him.  If there was an assassination it would come from the generals and the secret service.  They are the only group that can kill a president and get away with it.

Trump ain’t President.  He poses no existential threat to either the military or secret service.

Trump poses an existential threat to the Establishment Republican wing of the Deep State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Denny Zartman said:

This thread is very disturbing and probably should not be allowed. Everyone posting here will likely be investigated and added to government watch lists. Furthermore, this is quite excessively morbid. Whatever one thinks of Trump, good or bad, we must never wish any harm, much less mortal injury, upon him or anyone else in this world. It's just not right.

That said, I think the best method would be to sabotage his escalator, so that when he's going down it suddenly reverses direction and picks up speed. Then he would fall down the stairs. Theoretically, the speed of the upward movement of the escalator could be matched to the velocity in which he's falling, resulting in one long, continuous fall where he never reaches the bottom. Thumpity thumpity thump thump thump thumpity thumpity thump thumpity thunk thu-thunk thu-thunk thunk thunk thunk ect. He just keeps falling down the stairs, end over end, for hours and hours and hours and hours, until the sheer repetition of multiple impacts reduces his body to a fine pâté.

This is one of the finest Education Forum posts of 2023, Denny... 🤥

Thanks for sharing.  I especially liked the thumpity thump elevator scenario.

As for the ballyhooed MAGA tropes about Trump being an heroic victim and adversary of the "Deep State," let's not forget that Secret Service and Pentagon officials deleted their January 6th texts and Emails, and did nothing to protect the U.S. Congress for three hours on January 6th, despite knowing, in advance, that Trump's MAGA mob was dangerously armed.

If that wasn't dereliction of duty, what is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...