Clint Hill to do damage control tonight on NBC! "MANY RAMIFICATIONS" INDEED!

[Vince Palamara]

 

[Vince Palamara]

I am savage, what can I say? 

[Vince Palamara]

Responding to someone on Hill's thread: 

On 7/29/2023 at 4:20 PM, Micah Mileto said:

https://youtu.be/GbUft5yvmrg

 

Never heard anything about some of the stuff Vince is raising here.

 

[Vince Palamara]

Maybe Clint can write another book...

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

16 minutes ago, Vince Palamara said:

Maybe Clint can write another book...

@Vince Palamara You have to admit, this is hilariously funny.  Let see what Mr. Hill says tonight.  I don't know how he can defend what he has said in the past.

[Joseph Backes]

What a Sh#t storm.  

Keep in mind NBC won't even acknowledge they have an editorial policy of supporting the WC. 

Joe

[Joseph Backes]

Now I'm actually waiting to watch NBC news.  

As The Thing would say, "What a revolting development."

[Vince Palamara]

 

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

1 hour ago, Vince Palamara said:

 

Recent examinations into the JFK assassination have raised pertinent questions about the bullet found on the stretcher at Parkland Hospital.

Bullet Origin: It remains uncertain how the bullet arrived at its location:

a. It could have inadvertently fallen from either Governor Connally or President Kennedy.

b. Alternatively, it might have been intentionally placed there.

Retired Secret Service agent Paul Landis has provided a testimony that adds another dimension to the narrative. He claims to have discovered the bullet in the back seat of the presidential limousine, where JFK had been seated, and subsequently placed it on the stretcher.

Landis's actions, as he described, raise questions about standard evidence collection procedures. Ordinarily, one would anticipate that such critical evidence would be handed over to law enforcement officers directly, ensuring its chain of custody and integrity.

While Mr. Landis's account may seem unorthodox, it's essential to approach this with an open mind. People often react unpredictably in high-stress situations, and what might appear questionable in retrospect could have been deemed appropriate in the heat of the moment.

[Benjamin Cole]

1 hour ago, Keyvan Shahrdar said:

Recent examinations into the JFK assassination have raised pertinent questions about the bullet found on the stretcher at Parkland Hospital.

Bullet Origin: It remains uncertain how the bullet arrived at its location:

a. It could have inadvertently fallen from either Governor Connally or President Kennedy.

b. Alternatively, it might have been intentionally placed there.

Retired Secret Service agent Paul Landis has provided a testimony that adds another dimension to the narrative. He claims to have discovered the bullet in the back seat of the presidential limousine, where JFK had been seated, and subsequently placed it on the stretcher.

Landis's actions, as he described, raise questions about standard evidence collection procedures. Ordinarily, one would anticipate that such critical evidence would be handed over to law enforcement officers directly, ensuring its chain of custody and integrity.

While Mr. Landis's account may seem unorthodox, it's essential to approach this with an open mind. People often react unpredictably in high-stress situations, and what might appear questionable in retrospect could have been deemed appropriate in the heat of the moment.

Exactly. 

Post-JFKA, there was extraordinary pressure to toe the official line. 

Even a strong man like Chief Curry, who (along with Sheriff Bill Decker) had ordered his men towards the Grassy Knoll area in the immediate aftermath of the JFKA, would tell the WC he did not know where the shots had come from. 

Even Curry---not a federal or Deep State employee---could not simply repeat what his own senses had told him. 

Later (1967) Curry would write a book stating the WC conclusions were at odds with what witnesses had recounted, and let it go at that. 

 

 

 

 

 

[K K Lane]

Truth must be the lodestar.

Clint Hill's reaction should NOT be: I wish Landis didn't create complications.   His reaction should be.   Is this the truth?   And, if so, how does this impact the broader narrative?

[Joseph Backes]

Clint looked terrible and added nothing of value.  That NBC gave a little over 2 minutes to it was pathetic.

I was very surprised they talked to and aired a little bit with Dr. Gary Aguilar.  

[Benjamin Cole]

8 hours ago, K K Lane said:

Truth must be the lodestar.

Clint Hill's reaction should NOT be: I wish Landis didn't create complications.   His reaction should be.   Is this the truth?   And, if so, how does this impact the broader narrative?

Amen. 

[Michael Griffith]

16 hours ago, Vince Palamara said:

Clint Hill's 2014 email to Landis urging him not to speak out because his account would have "many ramifications" says volumes.

When a few of the medical witnesses changed their descriptions of JFK's large head wound, WC apologists brushed aside the fact that their later descriptions of the wound contradicted their initial ones. But, oh, now they insist that Landis must be mistaken or lying because his disclosure about finding a bullet in the back seat contradicts his initial statements.