Jump to content
The Education Forum

The Report that got Allen Dulles Fired


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Paul, I highly recommend The Siege of Jadotville .  . . 

An Irish-South African production, the film is based on Declan Power's book, The Siege at Jadotville: The Irish Army's Forgotten Battle(2005), about an Irish Army unit's role in the titular Siege of Jadotville during the United Nations Operation in the Congo in September 1961,[3] part of the Congo Crisisthat stretched from 1960 to 1965.

First screened at the 2016 Galway Film Festival,[4] the film received a limited cinema distribution in Ireland in September 2016.[5] It had simultaneous worldwide distribution on Netflix and in a number of US iPic Theaters during October 2016.[6][7] It won three Irish Film & Television Awards, including Best Director.

 

You might not be aware that UN Representative Conor Cruise O'Brien from Ireland who was tapped by Hammerskjöld for this operation, played a significant role in securing resident visas for Otto and Ilse Skorzeny to purchase Martinstown House in the Curragh, County Kildare.  Although the allegation that Skorzeny played a role in Lumumba's murder is not mentioned in the film, the backstory and the timing of Dag's "crash" toward the end of the film are infinitely intriguing. Neither is there mention of the American Committee for Aid to Katanga Freedom Fighters in the film whose signatories included not only Allen Dulles but Jack Crichton of Texas, a prime suspect named in the Lafitte records as having been responsible for facilitating action on the ground in Dealey in the lead up to the assassination of John Kennedy. (Quinlan, the hero of the story, is a homeboy of Co. Kerry, my husband's home county.)

 

UN Representative Conor Cruise O’Brien was portrayed very negatively in the Siege of Jadotville film. O’Brien later became an Irish government minister, the editor-in-chief of the Observer newspaper in London and a Unionist politician in Northern Ireland. He became so rabidly opposed to Irish nationalism and the IRA, that I suspect he had British intelligence connections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

To say as some are implying  that somehow Kennedy did not figure prominently in the defeat of the Katanga secession is simply not accurate.

And to also imply that American policy did not drastically change after his death, this is also not accurate.

As Jonathan K notes in Endless Enemies,  the White House and the CIA now tried to blame the Simba Rebellion--some of the last of Lumumba's followers--on influence from China!

Just recall, for the disaster that took place ultimately in Congo, three men had to perish:

Lumumba

Dag Hammarskjold

Kennedy.

IMO, without those murders, and that is what they were, Belgium would not have retaken control and neither would have Union Miniere.  This is why Lumumba became a hero in Africa, and why so many streets, buildings, parks and even children were named after Kennedy.

X

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, John Cotter said:

UN Representative Conor Cruise O’Brien was portrayed very negatively in the Siege of Jadotville film. O’Brien later became an Irish government minister, the editor-in-chief of the Observer newspaper in London and a Unionist politician in Northern Ireland. He became so rabidly opposed to Irish nationalism and the IRA, that I suspect he had British intelligence connections.

 

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

 

Arms for whom? The IRA?

Did it have anything to do with the 1970 “Arms Crisis” which threatened to bring down the Irish government and which involved, among others, the Belgian businessman and former SS member Albert Luykx?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Luykx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Grand Slam was made up of Swedish, Indian, Ghanian and Ethiopian troops under Major General Chand of India.

It was approved by U Thant and Kennedy.

If i recall, it only had something like 11 casualties  on the UN side.

To me it was an example of what the UN could do for a just cause when necessary.

But without Kennedy, the UN pulled out.

In less than a year after Kennedy's murder, everything went downhill.  Until Indonesia, Katanga was known as one of  the richest mineral deposits there was.  And since the Belgians had sacked the treasury, Lumumba knew he had to keep hold of it for the country to have an economic future.

 

Edited by James DiEugenio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, John Cotter said:

Arms for whom? The IRA?

Did it have anything to do with the 1970 “Arms Crisis” which threatened to bring down the Irish government and which involved, among others, the Belgian businessman and former SS member Albert Luykx?

 

 


X

Edited by Leslie Sharp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Leslie Sharp said:

Yes, we speak to the Arms Crisis (and I thought I included ref. to Lyckx; it's possible it was left on the cutting room floor in final edit.  Looking back, the Irish chapter of Coup should have been the bones of a separate book but we were anxious to lay the foundation of the geo-political, geographical importance of Ireland.)

' . . . Among those representing the Irish government at the reception for the Skorzenys was Mayo “Mafia” and backbench Teachta Dála (TD) Paddy "The Bishop" Burke, known as such for his diligent attendance at constituents' funerals. Decades later, his son Ray would be identified in the press as among the most corrupt politicians the country had ever known. Bishop Burke was joined at the Skorzeny reception by up-and-coming member of Dáil Éireann, TD Charles J. Haughey, anxious to welcome the glamorous couple just in from Madrid. In a little over a dozen years from that first public outing with Otto and Ilse, Charlie Haughey would play a central role in the “Arms crisis of 1970.” The scandal, and the preceding border campaign of 1956–1962, dubbed “Operation Harvest”—a guerilla warfare action carried out by the IRA aimed at overthrowing British rule in The North—are backdrop to the prime years spent in Ireland by guerilla warfare expert and alleged arms dealer, Otto Skorzeny and wife Ilse. . . .



. . . In 1956, just months before Skorzeny began his quest for Irish visas, the Irish Republican Army (IRA) launched “Operation Harvest,” an overtly ambitious guerrilla effort that was meant to secure the political unity of Ireland by force of arms. It was waged against the backdrop of a “thaw” in international relations and drew inspiration from successful anti-colonial guerrilla struggles in Algeria and Cyprus. We know with certainty how deeply involved were Otto Skorzeny and those identified by Pierre Lafitte in the Algerian uprisings, so any assessment of the Irish campaign that began in December 1956 should be considered in context and timing. The start of Operation Harvest also coincided with the 1956 insurgency in Hungary against Russian domination. Irish Republicans, legitimately, were quick to point out the hypocrisy of those who praised the armed revolt of the Hungarians but condemned the Irish resistance fighters. During the ’50s the British had been ruthlessly suppressing anti-colonial revolts in Kenya, Malaya, and Cyprus, and while their colonial empire was crumbling, their conceit that they were still a supreme military power remained. Suez burst that bubble, and we know that Skorzeny was heavily involved there as well. It was in the wake of that British humiliation in Egypt that Operation Harvest was launched in Ireland. By the end of 1957 there were several hundred IRA members interred in Dublin, Belfast, and other British prisons, and there were 125 internees in the Curragh Camp in County Kildare, only miles from where Otto and Ilse would set up camp in 1959… In a world of struggles for national self-determination it was clear that the Irish struggle remained unfinished business. The lull which followed the end of the campaign in 1962 proved illusory and six years later the nationalists and republicans of the Six Counties rose up, never to retreat again. 

Many thanks for that expansive reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because as Lovett said to JFK: Foster Dulles had his brother's back.

But Lovett now said Kennedy had the perfect opportunity to get rid of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, one of the reasons I brought up the UN action approved by Kennedy and the Secretary General is one of the articles I am working on right now for Substack.

See, Kennedy greatly admired Dag Hammarskjold. When he died Kennedy brought in a Swedish diplomat from the embassy.  He told him that Dag was the greatest statesman of the 20th century. He could never hope to equal him in stature.

This is why I think that when Gullion sent the cable saying it was no accident what happened to Dag, that Kennedy decided to take an active part in the operation. This included two visits to the UN, invoking Dag's name.

But the distinction I want to point out is that Kennedy used the UN to settle the dispute.

When HRC, Rice and Power wanted to get rid of Gaddafi, they used NATO to bomb Libya.

This is something I am going to specifically bring up in my two parter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, James DiEugenio said:

Because as Lovett said to JFK: Foster Dulles had his brother's back.

But Lovett now said Kennedy had the perfect opportunity to get rid of him.

Recently reading "The Brothers" by Stephen Kinzer I have to wonder if Eisenhower was not more involved.  The fatherly former General seemed to have approved pretty much everything the Dulles brothers did.  Has a critical analysis of Eisenhower's presidency ever been done?  Regarding foreign policy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Interesting point Ron.

Kuznick and Stone argue that Eisenhower should take much more blame for what happened, instead of just dumping everything on Foster Dulles.  Which is what many people have done.

A good revisionist history of Ike is Blanche Wiesen Cook's The Declassified Eisenhower.

Edited by James DiEugenio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...