• Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team
Kathleen Collins

The blond Oswald in Mexico

243 posts in this topic

2 hours ago, Thomas Graves said:

Did Azcue describe the guy who was-or-was-not there (in the Cuban Consulate on 9/27/63) in such a way as to point a finger at KGB officer Nikolai Leonov because he knew the CIA would have surveillance photos of him like this one?

But to what end, unless Azcue knew that Leonov was the guy who had impersonated Oswald, but didn't want to actually name him?

Tommy,

You want to guess the motivation of Eusebio Azcue -- without reference to the harsh violence of the Mexican Police with regard to Communists and Cuban consuls?

TO WHAT END, is the right question, WOULD AZCUE finger Nikolai Leonov?

You suggest that the END, the REASON, would be to correctly finger LHO's impersonator.

But NOBODY ASKED AZCUE FOR THE IDENTITY OF AN IMPERSONATOR.

Therefore, the rational motive (the END) for Azcue's deliberate description of somebody OTHER than LHO (whose photograph he surely saw in LHO's Fake FPCC resume) was TO TAKE THE HEAT OFF OF HIMSELF.

The Mexican Police were breathing down his neck.  Isn't that perfectly obvious to every reader here but yourself?

Why do you continue to skirt this issue?

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

On 5/9/2017 at 5:25 PM, Paul Trejo said:

Tommy,

You want to guess the motivation of Eusebio Azcue -- without reference to the harsh violence of the Mexican Police with regard to Communists and Cuban consuls?

TO WHAT END, is the right question, WOULD AZCUE finger Nikolai Leonov?

You suggest that the END, the REASON, would be to correctly finger LHO's impersonator.

But NOBODY ASKED AZCUE FOR THE IDENTITY OF AN IMPERSONATOR.

Therefore, the rational motive (the END) for Azcue's deliberate description of somebody OTHER than LHO (whose photograph he surely saw in LHO's Fake FPCC resume) was TO TAKE THE HEAT OFF OF HIMSELF.

The Mexican Police were breathing down his neck.  Isn't that perfectly obvious to every reader here but yourself?

Why do you continue is to skirt this issue?

Regards,
--Paul Trejo

Relax, Trejo.

Using upper-case letters like that on a forum like this is a sure sign of desperate fanaticism.

--  Tommy  :sun

PS  "Harsh violence," huh.  I much prefer "gentle violence," myself, but I must admit -- it does sound rather exciting.

LOL

Edited by Thomas Graves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

 

Bill Simpich has recently pointed out to me in a PM that ("Blond Oswald") Leonov was thrice a TARBRUSH target.  

Simpich believes Leonov played the same role for the KGB as Dave Phillips did for the CIA, and, rather cryptically, that "Leonov saw someone upset."

--  Tommy :sun

Interested readers should google: leonov tarbrush farrell .

Edited by Thomas Graves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now