Ron Ecker Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 It's fascinating that the name Curtis Berkley is so rich with anagams. In alphabetical order: Be Cruelty Risk Be Truly Sicker Icky Blusterer Liberty Sucker Lusty Bickerer Rickety Rubles Risky Tubercle Trickery Blues Ye Curst Bilker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Perhaps you err in assuming that I have given any consideration to the potentiality of your "wrath", or anyone else's, whatsoever. I assure you that I have not and will not, trusting that this forum is beyond such silliness as that. I'm struggling to even conceive of what that looks like, actually, and am not sure that I could identify when and where the "wrath" of a message board poster might be unleashed upon me. Will it appear in all caps? A different font? Bold? Perhaps it will include a tell-tale sign, like a frown-faced emoji? Indeed it does! I refer you to the post stylings of Steve Gaal, Judyth Baker and DVP. You can't say you haven't been warned now. Absent your guided help in that, I will simply continue to assume that such "wrath" is present in any post which innately compels me to hum the faint strains of circus music, while reading it. And while maybe not the most accurate method of discernment, the music will at least, and perhaps appropriately, conjure up good feelings for me, nonetheless, as I will be reminded of my favorite part of any circus, which is the sending in of the clowns There ya go. They scare the crap out of normal people. That's a true fact. I read it on the net. Ironically enough, this word also begins with a "c" - which I understand your predilection for words such as those, from your recent and previous posts. So, perhaps we've found some common ground, after all. And I'm most glad for it, friend. Still being coy what you did, Curtis? I'll have to keep guessing. Cryptologic Technician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Larsen Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 It's fascinating that the name Curtis Berkley is so rich with anagams. In alphabetical order: Be Cruelty Risk Be Truly Sicker Icky Blusterer Liberty Sucker Lusty Bickerer Rickety Rubles Risky Tubercle Trickery Blues Ye Curst Bilker LOL You forgot "Terrible Yucks," Ron. Ron Ecker yields only: Corn Reek Sandy Larsen yields: Anal Dryness I guess I'll be buying myself some Tucks pads next time I go out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtis Berkley Posted December 29, 2015 Author Share Posted December 29, 2015 Perhaps you err in assuming that I have given any consideration to the potentiality of your "wrath", or anyone else's, whatsoever. I assure you that I have not and will not, trusting that this forum is beyond such silliness as that. I'm struggling to even conceive of what that looks like, actually, and am not sure that I could identify when and where the "wrath" of a message board poster might be unleashed upon me. Will it appear in all caps? A different font? Bold? Perhaps it will include a tell-tale sign, like a frown-faced emoji? Indeed it does! I refer you to the post stylings of Steve Gaal, Judyth Baker and DVP. You can't say you haven't been warned now. Absent your guided help in that, I will simply continue to assume that such "wrath" is present in any post which innately compels me to hum the faint strains of circus music, while reading it. And while maybe not the most accurate method of discernment, the music will at least, and perhaps appropriately, conjure up good feelings for me, nonetheless, as I will be reminded of my favorite part of any circus, which is the sending in of the clowns There ya go. They scare the crap out of normal people. That's a true fact. I read it on the net. Ironically enough, this word also begins with a "c" - which I understand your predilection for words such as those, from your recent and previous posts. So, perhaps we've found some common ground, after all. And I'm most glad for it, friend. Still being coy what you did, Curtis? I'll have to keep guessing. Cryptologic Technician. Asked and answered on my time in the Navy. Nothing coy about it, gave a relatively thorough description. You were a CryptoTech? If so, then so much has come snapping into focus, and I now have a much better prism by which to read your posts, Greg. Thanks for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ecker Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 It's fascinating that the name Curtis Berkley is so rich with anagams. In alphabetical order: Be Cruelty Risk Be Truly Sicker Icky Blusterer Liberty Sucker Lusty Bickerer Rickety Rubles Risky Tubercle Trickery Blues Ye Curst Bilker LOL You forgot "Terrible Yucks," Ron. Darn, you're right, I forgot that one. Sandy Larsen yields: Anal Dryness I guess I'll be buying myself some Tucks pads next time I go out. Or try some of this (another Curtis Berkley anagram): Trickery Lubes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curtis Berkley Posted December 29, 2015 Author Share Posted December 29, 2015 It's fascinating that the name Curtis Berkley is so rich with anagams. In alphabetical order: Be Cruelty Risk Be Truly Sicker Icky Blusterer Liberty Sucker Lusty Bickerer Rickety Rubles Risky Tubercle Trickery Blues Ye Curst Bilker Lusty Bickerer sounds like the lead character in an adult-themed re-do of Stone's JFK. I'll take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 (edited) It's fascinating that the name Curtis Berkley is so rich with anagams. In alphabetical order: Be Cruelty Risk Be Truly Sicker Icky Blusterer Liberty Sucker Lusty Bickerer Rickety Rubles Risky Tubercle Trickery Blues Ye Curst Bilker Lusty Bickerer sounds like the lead character in an adult-themed re-do of Stone's JFK. I'll take it. regardless, Stone's JFK-the movie set back WCR supporters and the report 25 years.... they've never recovered, and never will. Edited December 29, 2015 by David G. Healy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Larsen Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Sandy Larsen yields: Anal Dryness I guess I'll be buying myself some Tucks pads next time I go out. Or try some of this (another Curtis Berkley anagram): Trickery Lubes LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Larsen Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 regardless, Stone's JFK-the movie set back WCR supporters and the report 25 years.... they've never recovered, and never will. Oliver Stone should set WCR supporters back another 25 years with a prequel named Dulles, based on Talbot's book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Stone's JFK-the movie set back WCR supporters and the report 25 years.... they've never recovered, and never will. Only a rabid CTer could possibly think Stone's movie full of fantasy and sheer speculation has "set back" WCR supporters in any way whatsoever. But, then too, Healy's current address is "Another Planet", so who knows what he's likely to believe (or swallow). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Granted that JFK is entertainment, not history. But it sure gave rise to the ARRB, whose disclosures impugn both the Warren Commission and the HSCA. The ARRB didn't do much to reveal who killed JFK. It sure uncovered stuff the U.S. Government didn't want revealed. DVP: Assuming you're correct that Oswald did it alone, why have agencies of the U.S. Government fought so hard to reveal their files relating to the assassination? I'd rejoice if the files were laid bare and they indicated clearly that Oswald was the assassin. I'd go on with my life. I'm nagged, though, even though you aren't. By the neat opinion of the W.C., the MSM, and the mainstream historians that gets perforated by researchers. The researchers aren't 100-percent correct. They don't have to be to raise reasonable doubt. On the other hand, you and your fellow travelers have to be 100-percent correct. That is your burden. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Von Pein Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 (edited) DVP: Assuming you're correct that Oswald did it alone, why have agencies of the U.S. Government fought so hard to reveal their files relating to the assassination? Probably just bureaucratic red tape that none of the agencies ever wants to bother fighting. But whenever a new and previously "classified" document does get released --- what's in it? Certainly nothing that has proven a conspiracy. Edited December 29, 2015 by David Von Pein Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Richards Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 A couple of pages back, I made a post regarding Dr. Robert Shaw's press conference after operating on John Connally and him saying a bullet was still lodged in his thigh and would be removed at a later date. Anyway, that discussion seems to have been lost amongst anagrams, song lyrics and pointless back and forth. So back to Shaw's comments. Do they negate the SBT? Yes. Is Shaw wrong? No. Given he has just come from the operating room, he would know what was going on there. Regardless of what was to later happen, Shaw's comments at that moment are powerful, telling and proof that evidence was conspiratorially manipulated to frame LHO as a lone gunman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 After reading Shaw's testimony, where Specter did not ask one quesiton about this segment, I would have to agree. Did Shaw eve address this anywhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Gallaway Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Thanks Ron and Sandy for those anagrams. There has been a bit of "trickery" in Curtis. We do appreciate your "awestruck' by this forum but not to the point of being "one scintilla" persuaded is a bit hard to swallow. I suppose if that wasn't trickery, you're a guy whose always wanted to be seduced by someone else, but would let never let himself. Pity! You certainly must be a "bickerer' to just to undertake posting in the first place. But you're not the only one. Anyway this is all in good fun. I have some anagrams I'd like to contribute. Curtis, Dave, (love your JFK film library!) This onslaught of anagram diversion might be rather disconcerting, but I urge you guys to just relax and walk a little on the wild side. I often think of the empty void a LN would face without a CT. Some critical thought is good, but in every forum I've visited, I think the LN needs us more then we need them. I've done some personal research on anagrams and I really think there's something to this anagram thing. ANAGRAMS I'm pretty sure I got them all right. Sometimes it reads almost a time line, or a progression. President George W. Bush Greed rips the U.S.! Now Beg! Enthused, bigger powers! White person begrudges! Purge those dweeb grins! Begrudge this new poser! George Walker Bush, President of the USA The bugger seeks of oil! He's a warped runt! President Bush of the USA Phase of untested hubris Hothead usurps benefits USA President George Bush Huge, depressing saboteur Ass... one stupid bugger here! Ronald Wilson Reagan Ran on all wrong ideas Hey I can put down the Democrats too. But for now, I'll just put out a teaser on Obama. Remember Obama's short honeymoon period at the beginning of his Presidency? Actually he never had one, but there was some good will seeping around when he was President Elect, but of course, it just couldn't last. President Elect Barack Obama America pretends to be a black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now