Mark Johansson

The laws of physics do not allow me to believe the lone nut theory. One doesn’t need to be a rocket scientist to see that there were more than one person involved.

Interesting encounter. However, I don't agree with the headline: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2511848/How-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-helped-reporter-telephone-chance-encounter-just-seconds-shot-JFK.html

Shane, I can only agree with Mr. Simkin. One of the best documentaries I've seen. I really enjoyed to hear, for the first time, a very agitated Loran Hall. Cheers

Files should be tortured some more for lying about being involved in the JFK assassination IMO. Neither of the two men described by Bowers as being in the RR yard during the shooting seem to fit Files description or what he claimed to have down following the shooting. Bill Miller Bill, you better direct your anger towards Ed Hoffman. http://i26.tinypic.com/34oeaf9.jpg Whatever he describes, as a witness from over a 100 yards, was seen by no one much closer to it, not even by all the people on the railroad bridge. Has Hoffman really sold you that none of those people saw suitman running towards them along the picket fence, and that none of them saw railroad man accepting and dissassembling suitman's weapon at a distance from them of ..., what is it? 10 yards? Johansson

Files should be tortured some more for lying about being involved in the JFK assassination IMO. Neither of the two men described by Bowers as being in the RR yard during the shooting seem to fit Files description or what he claimed to have down following the shooting. Bill Miller Bill, Allow me to disagree: Lee Bowers Directly in line, towards the mouth of the underpass, there were two men. One man, middle-aged, or slightly older, fairly heavy-set, in a white shirt, fairly dark trousers. Another younger man, about midtwenties, in either a plaid shirt or plaid coat or jacket. James Files At that point, through the scope, I witnessed everything, matter and skull bring blown out to the back on the limousine and everyone on television watching saw Jackie Kennedy crawl out there to get it. I watched her hold it in her hand, crawl back on to the car, I put the Fireball back into the briefcase, and closed it up, I pulled my jacket off, reversed my jacket so I would have, instead of the plaid side out, I would have the grey like a dress jacket more or less and I put a cap on my head, my hat, to walk away, carrying a briefcase. I said: With my clothes I can turn my jacket inside out, it’s plaid on the inside, it looks like railroad workers. Somebody out there wearing a flanel shirt, nobody is going to pay attention to me. I said: I can go over there, walk around a piece of (inaudible), walk up and down those boxcars, cross the railroad tracks, look at things, I ‘ll just be another worker, nobody will even look at me. and my jacket was a grey poplin , we had these car jackets back then, they were like waistelength, not a short jacket, they kind of come down a little bit, no car jacket like … made out of a material that they no longer use, it was called poplin. You might even remember that material, the poplin material? Grey color, had a shine to it. That’s what the jacket was like that I was wearing. A pair of grey pants with it. And I reversed the jacket, it had the all-set plaids in it, kind-a-like checkers on the inside. When I turned it over it looked like one of the old grey flanel shirts we used to wear out, you know, when you’re doing work in the yard or something out there. And I walked around the railroad yard and was waiting for the time to pass. I’ve already reversed my jacket. When I picked up the guncase, I reversed my jacket, no plaid side, I ‘ve got the poplin grey material on the outside, I took the fedora hat under the sleeve of it, snapped it out and put it back on my head and I walked away, carrying the briefcase and my 45 inside my coat pocket. Johansson

Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson I'm sorry you're not convinced Wim, Undercover secret agents wear wigs, headpieces or whatever to conceal their identity!!! Try matching the facial features, height, body size and maybe you'll find the real Mexico City Oswald. From Spartacus: "In 1956 Sturgis moved to Cuba. He also spent time in Mexico; Venezuela, Costa Rica; Guatemala, Panama and Honduras. It is believed that during this time Sturgis worked undercover as a secret agent for the Central Intelligence Agency." Oh by the way Wim, you look like Kelso in your Johansson avatar!! Don Don, First of all, I am a real person by the name of Mark Johansson. Wim Dankbaar used my profile when his password was lost and he couldn’t get any help from the moderators. Secondly, the guy photographed by the surveillance cameras in Mexico is not Frank Sturgis. If it is, then there must have been some plastic surgery involved. See for yourself. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/LHO25.htm Who is Kelso by the way? Johansson Hey Johannsen/Wim, Who is Kelso by the way? My point exactly... you do not have a clue about America. If you lived in America you would understand, same goes with your understanding of Frank Sturgis. Don Don, Who are you to judge my knowledge of America and Frank Sturgis? Anyone can see that the Mexican version of Oswald is not Frank Sturgis. Johansson

Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson I'm sorry you're not convinced Wim, Undercover secret agents wear wigs, headpieces or whatever to conceal their identity!!! Try matching the facial features, height, body size and maybe you'll find the real Mexico City Oswald. From Spartacus: "In 1956 Sturgis moved to Cuba. He also spent time in Mexico; Venezuela, Costa Rica; Guatemala, Panama and Honduras. It is believed that during this time Sturgis worked undercover as a secret agent for the Central Intelligence Agency." Oh by the way Wim, you look like Kelso in your Johansson avatar!! Don Don, First of all, I am a real person by the name of Mark Johansson. Wim Dankbaar used my profile when his password was lost and he couldn’t get any help from the moderators. Secondly, the guy photographed by the surveillance cameras in Mexico is not Frank Sturgis. If it is, then there must have been some plastic surgery involved. See for yourself. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/LHO25.htm Who is Kelso by the way? Johansson

Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson

There's a few pages online of his book "Food for the Jackals". http://books.google.com/books?id=OpX-cJ6ES...L95O-g#PPA40,M1 Well, I guess the jackals have enough bones with page 39 Wim

No Mark, you've got it all wrong. I have not posted for a long time here, and when I resumed , I found that I could not login. My username as well as my password did not work anymore. I tried the "retrieve a new password" function, but that did not function either, because the software kept saying : nos such username or email address i known" or some message of that kind. I have emailed John Simkin with a request to give me some assistance on resolving the problem, but never received a response. Then I have emailed James Richards who responded that he would take it up with John. Since there has been no response, I have then asked Mark Johansson if I could make a post under his name with his password. This was in the assumption that when the moderators would grasp me posting under Mark's name (which postings I always sign with Wim) they would jump in and give me directions on how to post under my own name again. But so far, and to my surprise, this has not happened yet. That's the correct story. Wim

No, I have not seen that before, but even if there is some truth to the statement, I fail to see the significance. Wim

The end conclusion of this video is "Spread the word!" But which word do you want to be spread on the JFK assassination? Wim

.Then why did you ask? Well, tough luck then! That's a strange selection, Bugliosi was 50 bucks, right? I get it now, the funds are dried up for the real witnesses. Tell me Bill, did you ever see the Chauncey Holt DVD I made available? Can you recommend it? Or was he full of XXXX too? http://www.amazon.com/Spooks-Hoods-Hidden-.../dp/B000W8HEC2/ The LHO museum was Judyth's, not mine, and it has been dissolved 3 years ago. But I don't expect you to be current on Judyth. It existed for 6 months and I have yet to see that your Secret History Museum and Assassination Research Center in DC will last longer, if any. You're a real dreamer, Bill, still believing in justice and getting witnesses on the stand, rather than publicizing the truth. I 've got to give you credits for that. Wim

That would be nice, Jack. If only the moderators would come through with some assitance to regain my password. Wim

Bill , I refuse to jump to the demands of someone who wants to know a publicly accessible detail, while he has demonstrated his prejudice and closedmindedness towards the subject, at the same time solliciting monies from me for a grand jury that will never happen, but refusing to buy a DVD for 25 bucks. If you are that cheap, then let someone else here, who has that DVD, write up a transcript for you about the specifics of Judyth's meeting with Lee at the Post office, to finally help you out of your pathetic conjectures based on other one's hearsay. This is exactly why I say that the JFK research community is its own worst enemy and the biggest roadblock to the truth. The real culprits must be laughing their XXX off. For what it's worth, some of your reserach is really good. Wim

Because I first needed to "show" Badgeman according to the interpretations and "enhancements" of others. You can't really tell if the outline is correct? There is no correct outline to begin with, because all you see is blobs, lights and shadows. Do you mean the outline of "Gordon Arnold" or "Badgeman"? I'm sure you will see the "figure" here, or what some people perceive to be Badgeman: Now, you tell me if I drew the correct outline: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/badgemanareafigures.bmp and then zoom out to the full size of the Moorman picture: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/images/moorman-drawing1.JPG Badgeman does not necesserily negate the Files story. However, it would mean that James Files did not see or notice Badgeman, just like all other witnesses, except "wttness" Gordon Arnold. Judging from the irrefutable fact that alledged "Badgeman" and "Gordon Arnold" are too small to be humans anyway, that makes Files' story rather more credible than incredible But if you still like to cling on to Gordon Arnold, defying the laws of physics and human dimensions, then try to point out Badgeman kicking Gordon Arnold and robbing his film in any of these pictures: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/knoll.htm But heck, I also realise that not everyone accepted that the world was round when the evidence was presented to them. Wim

The picture (in position #3 below the Arnold interview in your link) does not show them as the same height. Does the existence of Badge Man negate the Files' story? That's because that is one of Jack's "enhancements", and I rather draw from the original. Badgeman negates all credibe evidence, like Lee Bowers, the HSCA acoustics tests, witness accounts, and the puff of smoke from under the large tree, seen by at least three witnesses, like Sam Holland and co-workers. But most of all, Badgeman negates the laws of physics. But if you don't believe your eyes or think I tricked them, be my guest , take a big copy of the Moorman picture and go through the exercise yourself. Wim

No , that is not true, but instead of hearing it from me, you can hear exactly how it went from Judyth: http://jfkmurdersolved.com/buy.htm Wim

http://jfkmurdersolved.com/badgeman.htm

Kindly stop defecating on this thread with your misrepresenations and lies. I did not loose a 'small fortune' to a con artist...I explained that elsewhere and that is repeating a misrepresentation I have already corrected only to besmirch me. I'm reporting this post. It seems as if you still work for CREEP creating problems for those who really are working on this case. Peter, it's better to accept the jackals swirling around. Just ignore them. Wim

Dear Cyril, I am not sure we understand each other. I am saying - defying the ruling consensus in the JFK research community - that the throat wound was NOT an entry wound , but an EXIT wound caused by a fragment from the explosive bullet that hit JFK in the head from the grassy knoll. I have always believed it was caused by a complete bullet from the front, until Thom Robinson freed me from that dream. Here are some thoughts I posted a few months ago: Question: you are doctor with experience on bullet wounds, you see a tiny neat little round hole in a throat. What would you think first? 1) This is an entry wound of a small caliber bullet 2) This is an exit wound from a fragment of an explosive bullet that hit in the head. Mind you, the doctors didn't know about about an explosive bullet, let alone a mercury bullet. No, I don't blame the doctors at all. If it looks like duck, if it walks like a duck, if it sounds like duck, you're going to say it's a duck. JFK was NOT shot in the throat. I too have believed for a long time that he was shot in the throat. But it didn't happen. The only time that JFK COULD have been shot in the throat, was very early in the game, at the beginning of the Zapruder film. Why? Because after that, he slumps forward and his throat is not exposed anymore. It doesn't make sense for ANY shooter, not even a trigger happy one, to shoot from the front that early, if the plan was to frame a patsy from BEHIND. Moreover, it would be an EXTREMELY risky shot right thru the windshield (glass breaks the line of vision, and could also deflect the bullet path). The bullet hole, crack or whatever it was in the windshield, was the result from a missed bullet from behind over JFK's head. Just as the nick in the chrome lining was. Additionally, his head and throat would be exposed for only a very short time, with no time to follow and aim. And the other passengers were in the way, JFK was the most rear passenger in the limo, hence an additional risk to hit someone else in the car. Finally, there was no wound of exit, neither a bullet found, found for such a shot. The throat wound was caused by an exiting fragment , maybe even a drop of mercury from JF's mercury exploosive bullet. The tiny perforations in JFK's face, as observed by embalmer Thom Robinson, were also the result of mercury drops. Lastly, what you guys don't know is that I have an interview with Thom Robinson, wherein he states that the gaping hole in JFK's skull was probed with a tiny probe and that one of those probes from INSIDE the skull came out at the throat wound ! That's why he told me that he has always been very quiet about this, but that he has chuckled for all those years at the conspiracy buffs who claim JFK was shot in the throat from the front. He knew better since 1963. And I know better since I spoke to him. I should have known better earlier by listening to Jimmy, instead of to the JFK research community, and what they have brainwashed themselves with. I too was a victim of what I wanted to believe, and looked so self-evident. James Files was right all along. He was the ONLY shooter from the front, and even he was not supposed to shoot. But he did, because JFK had not been hit in the head. Failure was never an option in a operation that Jimmy took part in, not even at age 21. That's what made him such a valuable asset for the Chicago mob and the CIA. ******** ONeill in his official report said agent Kellerman, now deceased, told him that Kennedy cried out, "My God, Ive been hit, get me to a hospital!"The second bullet hit Texas Gov. John Connally, sitting in a jump seat behind Kellerman. The third was the fatal wound to Kennedy. ONeill said recently in an interview that Kellerman insisted, when pressed how he knew it was Kennedy's voice, "I was with the man for three years, and know his voice like I know my own. And he was the only man in the back seat of the car that day who spoke with a Boston accent." From: http://www.capecodtoday.com/blogs/index.ph...Ed/2007/03/21/a jarring report on jfk s autopsy Hence another clue JFK was NOT shot in the throat and Jimmy was correct in assuming the throat wound was an exiting fragment from his exploding bullet. . Wim

Is Brian referring to this: ONeill in his official report said agent Kellerman, now deceased, told him that Kennedy cried out, "My God, Ive been hit, get me to a hospital!"The second bullet hit Texas Gov. John Connally, sitting in a jump seat behind Kellerman. The third was the fatal wound to Kennedy. ONeill said recently in an interview that Kellerman insisted, when pressed how he knew it was Kennedy's voice, "I was with the man for three years, and know his voice like I know my own. And he was the only man in the back seat of the car that day who spoke with a Boston accent." Wim

Larry, what's your impression of this guy? A straight shooter? A grain of salt? ......... Wim

Sure! Are you Laurel or Hardy? Wim Wim, I don't have any illusions that justice can ever be done, but after years of doing this, it becomes apparent that Fletcher Prouty was right, and there's no sense doing all the research if you don't have a place to take it - a legal venue for the presentation of the evidence. The Grand Jury is that venue in the US legal system. In addition, regardless of what you believe about the assassination, you should want all the recrords released and recognize that the next big step necessary to move this case forward is to obtain additional sworn witness testimony under oath. That can happen at a Congressional hearing, a grand jury, or a civil case, such as a libel suit. Then witnesses can be subpoened and required to testify under oath about what they know. THAT is what will advance the TRUTH in the assassination of President Kennedy. As for Laurel and Hardy interviews with assassination witnesses, I will address that later, but it is an important issue that's seldom addressed. BK Bill, the place to take it is the American public. Now, I realise that I don't control the channels to bring it to them, but hey, maybe some day the wall breaks and the flood come down Then you will also have the outcry for your grand jury, if it's not too late then. Wim

Justice will never be done in this case. Too late for that anyway. Therefore I concentrate on truth, that's where we differ in approach . the hell with justice. Stop kidding yourself! Sure! Are you Laurel or Hardy? Wim