Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Ken Rheberg

Members
  • Content count

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ken Rheberg

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

5,057 profile views
  1. An Update on the Lancer Rebuild

    I found an email in my inbox yesterday from JFK Lancer dated 3/11/17 that I had somehow overlooked and never opened. It goes into great detail about Sherry's illness. So sorry to hear about this. Ken
  2. An Update on the Lancer Rebuild

    Thanks for the update.
  3. An Update on the Lancer Rebuild

    No response to my request nearly two months ago for an update on the Lancer Archive recovery project. So let's try again. It's now been three and a half months since the last update on this by James Gordon. The status then was that James had "re-sanctioned" the necessary work and that recovery of the Archive was a real possibility. So where does the project stand? James? Moderators? Anybody? Ken
  4. The first conspiracy theorist

    A bold and insightful comment. Not sure if it's been overlooked or deliberately avoided. But here it is again.
  5. An Update on the Lancer Rebuild

    Almost two months now since the last update. What's the latest on the Lancer rebuild?
  6. Muchmore film split into (8) GIFS

    Red Shirt Man was 60 year old western store owner Francis Lee Mudd, in Dallas on business that day from Shreveport, LA.
  7. Lancer Archive Restoration

    James, I don't see any response to Chris Scally's question in post #7. Essentially, the issue raised was whether or not current Lancer members had to register all over again. Also, is the Lancer Forum archive restoration still on schedule to be completed in August which is now just a few days away? Ken
  8. Dan Rather's outrageous comments on coasttocoastam

    Yup, he was in a press van on the outer edge of the plaza, if not a block away. It's interesting how big-name journalists like Brian Williams get caught lying so often. Maybe it's cause they get caught up in big stories and feel attached to them and feel the need to embellish their place in history. Thanks, Ron, for bringing up Dan Rather's whereabouts on the day of the assassination. For those who seriously want to get to the bottom of what really took place in Dealey Plaza, it's absolutely critical to go back, once again, to that very day. To Dan Rather. To CBS. And to KRLD. That much needed, necessary hard evidence Gary Mack often called out for has actually been waiting right there, for all of you, for over fifty-two years. That includes Jim DiEugenio who just doesn't understand what this is all about. And, Brian, your Dan Rather story is incorrect, sorry to say. Ken
  9. Why CBS Covered up the JFK Case (pt1)

    Jim, The title of this thread, which you started, is "Why CBS Covered up the JFK Case." It seemed like you were finally going to tackle the most important story of the Kennedy assassination. But your thread was, unfortunately, hijacked. No surprise when it comes to a CBS thread. Then you step in and attempt to get things back on track to CBS. Good for you. Alas, it's all for nothing. You're interested only in 1975. And 1967. And 1964. What a waste of time. No wonder it's 52 years and counting. If you really wanted to get to the bottom of this Kennedy mess, why wouldn't you return to 1963? The day of the assassination, to be exact. Just before 3:00pm CST. CBS. KRLD. Dan Rather. . . The story of your lifetime. Of our lifetime. But you won't do it. Why not, Jim? Ken Ken: I don't understand this. . . I don't know what the heck you are talking about when you say you want me to devote time to what happened in 1963. . . Jim, What's so hard to understand? I gave you a specific point in time on the day of the assassination that dealt with CBS, KRLD and Dan Rather. I told you it was the story of your lifetime. Of our lifetime. That should have piqued your interest. But it apparently went right over your head. Or, maybe, you'd just rather not go there. That's what I don't understand. By the way. Nice reference to CBS's Joe Wershba, a name many are not familiar with, but one that pops up in that story of a lifetime that will one day finally break this case wide open. Ken
  10. Why CBS Covered up the JFK Case (pt1)

    Jim, The title of this thread, which you started, is "Why CBS Covered up the JFK Case." It seemed like you were finally going to tackle the most important story of the Kennedy assassination. But your thread was, unfortunately, hijacked. No surprise when it comes to a CBS thread. Then you step in and attempt to get things back on track to CBS. Good for you. Alas, it's all for nothing. You're interested only in 1975. And 1967. And 1964. What a waste of time. No wonder it's 52 years and counting. If you really wanted to get to the bottom of this Kennedy mess, why wouldn't you return to 1963? The day of the assassination, to be exact. Just before 3:00pm CST. CBS. KRLD. Dan Rather. . . The story of your lifetime. Of our lifetime. But you won't do it. Why not, Jim? Ken
  11. WARNING to Forum Members: Please Read This!

    That's not exactly what is said on the Education Forum's homepage, Jon. The first line under “Terms of Use” is this: Unless otherwise stated, the copyright and other intellectual property rights in all material on this site is owned or controlled by the Education Forum. I don't see anything about public domain. Did we all have to consent to something different when we signed up? I don't recall. It would also be helpful if Larry Hancock or Debra Conway could weigh in on this issue as it relates to archived JFK Lancer Forum posts. And, for that matter, Robert Harris regarding the rules for his old JFK History Forum.
  12. DOES IT MATTER TODAY THAT JFK WAS KILLED?

    A tweak of what you've demanded here advances it to a very uncommon, somewhat meddlesome request: I want the full and complete truth as to why our government, the media, academia, and the JFK research community have fought so hard over the years to keep the American people from knowing the truth of the assassination.
  13. Kennedy Videos

    Well, Ken, I suppose it's *possible* that when I first posted my 85-part series, and switched from one 10-minute segment to the next, I could have excised ("edited") a few seconds of DEAD SILENCE when the camera was focused on a static image of the American flag. Perhaps I felt that such an extensive period of DEAD SILENCE and flag viewing wasn't really necessary to retain as I went from one part to the next. I can't really recall whether I cut out a few seconds of the dead silence or not. But perhaps I did, so that the next part in my 85-part version wouldn't be beginning with 10 seconds of dead silence. But when I earlier said that "There's no missing footage", I was really thinking of footage where Walter Cronkite (or some other CBS reporter) was actually speaking and providing news. I wasn't really thinking about missing periods of DEAD SILENCE. Is the possibility of a few seconds of total silence and dead air *really* an important issue to you, Ken? If so, I must ask --- Why?* * And I ask that question even though I, myself, definitely prefer all of my audio/video programs in my collection to be as "complete" and "unedited" as I can get them. But in this CBS instance, any "missing" footage amounts to pure nothingness (as far as actual "news content" is concerned). So why the need to belabor such a triviality? David, You now concede that you may have edited Cronkite's station break "a few seconds" after Rather's critical "first films taken in the motorcade just after the assassination shots were heard" report (which, by the way, Cronkite interrupted while Rather continued reporting). You refer to this possible edit of "a few seconds" three times in your post. Then you wonder if this is really important. You finally ask: "So why the need to belabor such a triviality?" By that, you mean the triviality of "a few seconds." Only problem here: I never said the edited footage was "a few seconds." You did. I said it was significant and considerable. And I said the station break itself was much, much longer than 10 seconds. This isn't a trivial matter. Moreover. . . You obviously don't have a copy of the official CBS tape, nor have you even seen it. So where did you get your copy? That would be a step in the right direction to find out who edited the station break way, way down to 10 seconds and, most importantly, why. Ken
  14. Kennedy Videos

    Thanks, David. I remember your earlier 85-part version of the CBS assassination coverage quite well. In particular, parts 14 and 15. I noticed Cronkite's considerably and significantly-edited "10 second" station break back then as well. That's why on September 24, 2010 I asked you about it in a thread on this forum. As far as I can tell, I never received a response. If you didn't edit it -- and I'll take you for your word that you didn't -- then I'd like to find out who did. Are you aware that the station break announced by Cronkite after Dan Rather's first film report on the official CBS tape lasted much, much longer than 10 seconds? Who did you get your copies from? Ken
×