Dawn Meredith

I always marvel at the fact that anyone who goes to school in this country, at any level, is taught that there exists a free press. How easily people are fooled. Sheeple indeed.The bigger the lie the more it is believed. Dawn

Two curious things about that,1) why were all the investigations dropped? and Why didn't the press report a word about it? You have got to be joking. Or else you know nothing about lamestream media. Or power. Dawn

I will save Len the trouble: Ms. Dawn Meredith Bar Card Number:13947620 Work Address:PO Box 150129 Austin, TX 78715-0129 Work Phone Number:512-280-7274 Primary Practice Location:AUSTIN , Texas Current Member Status Eligible To Practice In Texas MEMBERSHIPS In cooperation with Justia Overview LICENSE INFORMATION Bar Card Number:13947620 Texas License Date:02/01/1991 PRACTICE INFORMATION Firm:Bovik & Meredith, P.C. Firm Size:2 to 5 Occupation:Private Law Practice Practice Areas:Criminal, Family, Juvenile Services Provided: Hearing impaired translation:Not Specified ADA-accessible client service:Not Specified Language translation:Not Specified [*]Foreign Language Assistance: None Reported By Attorney LAW SCHOOLS Law School Graduation Date Degree Earned New England School Of Law 05/1983 Doctor of Jurisprudence/Juris Doctor (J.D.) PUBLIC DISCIPLINARY HISTORY State of Texas* Sanction Date of Entry Sanction Date Start - End Probation Date Start - End No Public Disciplinary History - Texas *NOTE: Only Texas disciplinary sanctions within the past 10 years are displayed. For sanction information beyond 10 years, information about a specific disciplinary sanction listed above or to request a copy of a disciplinary judgment, please contact the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel at (877) 953-5535. There is a $15.00 fee for each disciplinary judgment copied. Other States Sanction State Sanction Date Start - End None Reported By Attorney Statutory Profile Last Certified On:01/11/2012 The Texas Attorney Profile provides basic information about Attorneys licensed to practice in Texas. Attorney profile information is provided as a public service by the State Bar of Texas as outlined in Section 81.115 of the Texas Government Code. The information contained herein is provided "as is" with no warranty of any kind, express or implied. Neither the State Bar of Texas, nor its Board of Directors, nor any employee thereof may be held responsible for the accuracy of the data. Much of the information has been provided by the attorney and is required to be reviewed and updated by the attorney annually. The information noted with an asterisk (*) is provided by the State Bar of Texas. Texas grievance/disciplinary information will not appear on the profile until a final determination is reached. Access to this site is authorized for public use only. Any unauthorized use of this system is subject to both civil and criminal penalties. This does not constitute a certified lawyer referral service. COURTS OF ADMITTANCE Federal None Reported By Attorney [*] Other Courts None Reported By Attorney OTHER STATES LICENSED Massac

It is a common practice to go on inactive status when one: 1. Retires 2. Changes professions 3. Relocates to a different state. In 1990 after five years of practice in MA. I moved to Austin. I knew that I would not be returning to MA to live or practice law therefore saw no reason to keep my law licence current in that state. (Fees can get very high). For several years it said inactive then even that stopped. I have been a member of the TX bar in good standing since 2/1/91. Never had a problem. Dawn.

Your book arrived....looking forward to reading it after I finish the two I am reading now. Dawn

Joan has asked me to post this for her: "I would be happy to answer any questions to which I know the answers. Tom, please read the book to see whether or not I mention George & Priscilla McMillan, and other matters" Joan

Tom: She is working on two other books too, so I am not sure she will have much time to be on the forum... but you can ask...

Agreed. Thanks RCD. Always the voice of reason. Dawn

The late Doug Weldon was a fine researcher and by all accounts a good and honorable man. He measured his words and almost never spoke poorly of anyone. In the thread referenced by Greg, this is what he had to say: I'm more than content to be aligned with the thoughts of members like Doug Weldon and Don Jeffries when it comes to Greg Parker. Greg can have Scully and Colby. He's welcome to them. I've ignored Colby for years. I learned to do the same thing with Scully too. Wow. I can barely read this stuff...Mike: yes just ignore them. Otherwise they will just try to wear you down with insult after insult. The time wasted by Greg is astounding to me. AM I recalling this correctly: He is on record here as never reading Harvery and Lee. Nuff said. Dawn

Thanks for that reminder John. Working for him all during 72 changed my life. Wonderful man!! Dawn

Wow, just saw this now...

The real Billo. I bet he cannot stand that this is out there...I just posted it to my facebook page...share please...

Good idea but will they stay up? And I agree with Jim. The new media does not touch this stuff. And people actually believe there is a free press in the US. Hardly. Dawn

That makes me sick. Even Amazon is totally controlled. I bet Billo has people writing the reviews. No-one gets that many that fast.

Such bs. You do not have to be indicted to be on the FBI's most wanted list. Aren't lawyers supposed to have decent read comprehension skills? Where did I ever say you "have to be indicted to be on the FBI's most wanted list"? OBL was already on the list on 9/11. His wanted poster never listed 9/11 because he was never indicted for it. But perhaps Ms. Meredith can list people who made "on the FBI's most wanted list." without being indicted. http://www.fbi.gov/wanted EDIT - Added FBI link for Dawn Bumped for Dawn Bumped for Dawn Can you "list people who made it "on the FBI's most wanted list." without being indicted"? Colby I do not and will not EVER respond to you, so you can bump all you like and add in new threads. This is my one and only reply.

Oh my sweet Lord. You are a waste of space and a disgrace to this forum. I agree. So why are people arguing with him???? Dawn

I had hoped he'd live to be indicted. Well maybe not that, but at least have the truth come out about what he was.

Mike Joan has asked me to email you and thank you for posting this but I do not have an email for you, actually she wanted to thank you via email herself. I cannot contact you via the fourm either I get a "can't receive messages" message. Would you send me your email address, if that is not too bold of me.I believe the rule here is not to post someone else's and that it is ok to post your own. So I am thanking you publicly. Joan is busy with three books and does not go on forums. Apparently someone told her about this. I woke up to an email from her this am asking me for yours. Thanks Mike. Dawn

John I don't think there has ever been a book on this subject. I knew Jerry had written articles on the subject, one is in Government By Gunplay (Harvey Yazijian and Sid Blumenthal) "The Second Dallas Casualty: The Media and the Assassination of the truth". (I did not click on the link Robert provided so not sure if that is the article). I will email Jerry and see if he has other stuff on this subject that is online. He's an old friend who I see whenever I visit my daughter, known him since the 70's. This would actually be a good subject FOR a book. It is the fault of the controlled media that so many remain ignorant on this subject. The conspirators knew they would get away with it because our media is so far from "free" Dawn

I am looking very forward to your review Jim. I agree that David's did not go far enough, but thank you Mike for posting it. I copied and made it my status on facebook today. Are you on fb? Dawn

Exactly Bernice.

Wow. Chris Matthews can claim ignorance. Billo is simply a xxxx. And many will buy his trash while the great books on this subject are read by few. I think Marty Schotz got it right: mass denial. Dawn

Surely you cannot be serous. The TUM was Witt. That is truly shocking. Dawn

There was no reason to 'update' it because they is no doubt about their identities LOL I love that one, yes the USG orchestrated this giant conspiracy to murder thousands of people and fake huge amounts of evidence but were unwilling or able to include 9/11 on his wanted poster! It was not listed because he had not been indicted. He wasn't indicted presumably because it was unlikely he would every be brought to trial. Such bs. You do not have to be indicted to be on the FBI's most wanted list. Loved your post Don and looking very forward to your book.. People who deny conspiracy are either very stupid or lying.. However the "no people died" on 9-11 or there were no planes "explanation" is disturbing. I ignore people who run that scam. Dawn