![](http://content.invisioncic.com/r16296/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Thomas Graves
Two Posts Per day-
Posts
8,224 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Thomas Graves
-
Dennis Bartholomew said, "As an aside, I’m always astounded by the new information that John Armstrong keeps finding." James Hargrove replied, "Me too, and I’m his biggest fan. Amazing how many people (and groups) are gunning for him. I mean, if his conclusions about two Oswalds are wrong, which I doubt, so what?" RIGHT. So what if Armstrong, Hargrove, Josephs, et al., confused newbies, obfuscated the real facts of the case, and contributed to flaky "Deep State" thinking in the research community? Ain't no big deal. -- Tommy
-
Let's Think About "The Unthinkable," Shall We?
Thomas Graves replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
That's the good ol' Ronnie Ecker I remember from ten years ago! -- Tommy- 61 replies
-
- nikolai leonov
- blond oswald
- (and 4 more)
-
Interesting Congo crisis movie
Thomas Graves replied to David Andrews's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
"This video is unavailable." -
George. Dear. I don't mean to sound insulting, but you just don't seem to "get" it. There's a big difference between a really, really long term "doppelganger" project, and a short-term impersonation deal. Forum member and former Army counter-intelligence officer, Jon G. Tidd (who seems to have recused himself from posting on the forum due to a threatened lawsuit against him by another former contributor here who just happened to be a lawyer), has come up with an interesting compromise by opining that there was an "Oswald Double" project, but that it didn't start until "Harvey" (Marina's future husband) joined the Marines in October, 1956, not way back in 1947, or something, and that this four-year project artificially created the paperwork, etc., for the respective cover-story "childhoods" of Harvey and Lee. I am much more willing to accept this than the (imho) Paranoic, "Deep State"- Mindset -Engendering (and ultimately Obfuscating) very, very long term Harvey and Lee and the Two Marguerites cult-theory. Capiche? -- Tommy
-
Doctor Larsen, I wonder if the following would have any bearing on the issue at hand (pardon the pun). " 13. Technically, there is no legal proof that Oswald had gonorrhea because the doctors took a smear rather than a culture. Dr. Donabedian testified (8H313-14) that normally the doctors would use the smear method and, if the results appeared to be gonorrhea, would just assume it was and treat it as such, regardless of whether it might actually have been a different bacteria involved." http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/vd.htm#N_13_ -- Tommy
-
He's some academic specialist, on the 19th Century French dramatist Jean Giraudoux. He's also a narrator of fantasy books. LOL -- Tommy Ahh, France. The home of Thierry "Fake News" Speth, who misidentified Gloria Calvery on Elm Street way back in the day, which mis-identification is still haunting serious JFK assassination students and true researchers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_20_hoax
-
Sylvia Odio, Lee Harvey Oswald and Harry Dean
Thomas Graves replied to Paul Trejo's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
I'm probably wrong on this, but wasn't that trailer destined for Florida? Or am I thinking of a different one? -- Tommy- 246 replies
-
- sylvia odo
- harry dean
- (and 4 more)
-
Sweet George, Sorry to disappoint you, but I don't disagree with you. I was just pointing out the legalistic reality of the situation. Once Oswald was charged with murdering JFK, he became what is known as a "Defendant." From about 15 minutes after the assassination until Jack Ruby snuffed him out on 11.24.63, the DPD collected evidence to be used in the suspect's, and then defendant Oswald's, upcoming case, but then he up and died, and, unfortunately, at that point the DPD was no longer required to collect said evidence, some of which might even have been used, through the "discovery" process, to help defend Oswald! When Oswald was shot by Ruby, he was neither a suspect nor a "perp," He was a DEFENDANT. Love and kisses, -- Tommy
-
Let's Think About "The Unthinkable," Shall We?
Thomas Graves replied to Thomas Graves's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
edited and bumped- 61 replies
-
- nikolai leonov
- blond oswald
- (and 4 more)
-
Dear "Deep State" James, Well, gosh, one would think that that principal didn't routinely let the FBI take away the records of his students, and therefore he would have remembered and commented upon, way before Armstrong so effectively "jogged his memory," the subject of their coming to take Oswald's away, wouldn't one? -- Tommy
-
"Dear James" What's your theory as to where the photo originated? Cuban Intelligence? Mexican Intelligence? The Walt Disney Studio? Or the Mexico City CIA's LILYRIC camera, focused on the area near the front entrance of the Soviet Embassy, at 12:05 pm, October 2, 1963? https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4490&relPageId=3 -- Tommy PS Why are you calling the man in the photo (and the burly, balding guy aka Mexico City Mystery Man in the photo next to him, who, btw, was photographed by the same LILYRIC camera just eleven minutes later at 12:16 -- see the "contact sheet, above) Lee Harvey Oswald without quotation marks?